Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

British attack helicopters operating in Libya (merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

British attack helicopters operating in Libya (merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jun 2011, 12:42
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,287
Received 39 Likes on 30 Posts
PS: Don't mention Israel gunning down 20-30 unarmed civilians.
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2011, 18:47
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, it looks like the Apache will need quite a bit of work doing to it before it embarks again. I wonder if it's all affordable?

UK eyes Apache modifications after Libyan experience - 26 Oct 2011

It also exposed several shortcomings of the Apache for embarked operations, such as its current main rotor brake design, which was not strong enough under high wind conditions.

Crews also expressed concerns about the likely outcome of any ditching event, should they be unable to make it back to the ship.

"We need some sort of a flotation device, as the aircraft would sink like a stone," Tennant said. A new canopy jettison system would also be required, he said, as the current design could have fatal consequences if used once the aircraft is in the water.

The addition of an I-band transponder would aid crews' ability to navigate back to a ship, while an improvement is also needed in battery life to increase flight time from just 6min in the event of a total electrical system failure.
LFFC is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2011, 20:29
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 73 Likes on 33 Posts
Stand by for a comment from, "you know who", he won't be able to resist




25 missions (40 planned) in 3 months if the article is to believed, that doesn't seem like a high utilization rate?

Standing by to be corrected/flamed!
Biggus is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2011, 11:29
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
LFFC, all of the issues mentioned in that Flight story were known about in MOD years before the Libyan deployment.
BossEyed is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2011, 19:02
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My main concern is corrosion. The Apache is simply not designed to be at sea and has many places where salt will gather and cause damage. The only thing the Army should be looking at is the U.S Block 3 modifications.
RileyDove is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.