Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF training cuts leave Typhoons idle

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF training cuts leave Typhoons idle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Apr 2011, 10:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,847
Received 319 Likes on 115 Posts
RAF training cuts leave Typhoons idle

From the Daily Telegraph:

The Royal Air Force's most advanced warplanes have been unable to drop bombs on Libyan targets because defence spending cuts mean that pilots are not fully trained, The Telegraph can disclose.
See: RAF training cuts leave Typhoons idle - Telegraph

An MoD spokesman said: "We have sufficient Typhoon aircrew with appropriate training for all the systems and weapons to undertake the current tasks."
Oh, of course you have. How silly of the paper to have suggested otherwise...
BEagle is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 10:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the far south
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 14 Posts
They must have heard you.

LIBYA: RAF Typhoons drop first bombs in combat

Still, I hear Typhoons have all but stopped using the ranges in the last few years. So I guess there is at least an element of truth in the telegraph report.

TR
typerated is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 11:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Age: 50
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet the 'demands and pace of operations' are such that the RAF needs to replace all of the Typhoon pilots in theatre at then end of this month because it is too demanding to do more than 2 months in theatre. Really?!

Not the Aircrew's faults I know, just politics. They're doing the best job they can with the shackles they've been constrained within.
I'm Off! is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 11:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Jungle
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are the Tornado GR4s designating the bombs in for the Typhoons?
Foghorn Leghorn is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 12:32
  #5 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Typerated, the Typhoon does not carry (can't) practice bombs although it can strafe but an £80m aircraft firing a gun at a £100k truck makes little sense.

There is a training version of paveway but it is still a large piece of metal that has the potential to fly away from its intended target which makes the English and Welsh ranges too small.

To use the Scottish range, or overseas would be expensive as there is no requirement for the tiffy to drop bombs (I think they decided )
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 12:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Foghorn Leghorn,

The Telegraph would have you believe that the Litening pods are still in their packing cases at RAF Coningsby. The Typhoon is regularly noted carrying the pods and can designate for itself and others.

The only problem with the designating pod is that it takes up the centre-line station. Rafale for example carries the a pod on a non-stores location. I don't think that there is any other solution for the Typhoon in regards to pod carriage as it would mean taking up one of the AMRAAM recessed locations? There would probably be clearance issues for the nearby pylons if it was mounted there?

Rafale pod location.

Mer et Marine : Toute l'actualité maritime

http://www.xisquadron.co.uk/News/AFM...ngsofSwing.pdf

No doubt there will be some images coming out of Italy?

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 14:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 14:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Jungle
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could that be a Tornado GR4 designating for a bomb released from a Typhoon?
Foghorn Leghorn is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 14:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,158
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Fog Leg - of course it could be, but why would they lie so openly? The truth would eventually out and it's simply not worth it. I'm sure that is what it says it is. And the weapon effect is definitely NOT a DMS Brimstone!

I enjoyed reading the last paragraph of the link by typerated:

Dalton hails the performance of the Tornado force during the UK's Operation Ellamy contribution to NATO's Operation Unified Protector, noting: "It has become the norm for each GR4 to take on four or six targets, each of which has been positively identified." Its key weapons are the Brimstone and Raytheon Systems' Paveway IV 226kg precision-guided bomb.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 14:53
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Jungle
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They wouldn't be lying, as technically the Typhoon would have struck the MBT with a weapon released from the aircraft. It just wouldn't have been laser designated by the same aircraft though.
Foghorn Leghorn is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 14:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
I enjoyed reading the last paragraph of the link by typerated:
Quote:
Dalton hails the performance of the Tornado force during the UK's Operation Ellamy contribution to NATO's Operation Unified Protector, noting: "It has become the norm for each GR4 to take on four or six targets, each of which has been positively identified." Its key weapons are the Brimstone and Raytheon Systems' Paveway IV 226kg precision-guided bomb.
That's a bloomin expensive way of getting rid of MBTs and APCs. Surely something along the lines of a GAU-8 would be cheaper per mission?
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 16:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Europe
Age: 55
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forgive me for asking something here that I've been wondering for some time. Why isn't the Typhoon qualified to fire the Brimstone (yet)? It'd seem like a logical thing to do I'd think.
Rengineer is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 16:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilot training in the old days.

Slight thread drift, but I'm going for a tenuous link with the pilot training bit.
Image of 2 pages from a RFC Training Record book dated 1917.

Spurlash2 is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 16:29
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: High in the Afghan Mountains
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rengineer

'Forgive me for asking something here that I've been wondering for some time. Why isn't the Typhoon qualified to fire the Brimstone (yet)? It'd seem like a logical thing to do I'd think.'

Put simply - cost. If you've got GR4s to fire the DMS Brimstone (and Stormshadow, 27mm, Pwy2/3/4, etc) then why spend good money this year get your (primary role AD) Typhoons able to duplicate? GR4s will go eventually and just before then you need multi-role Typhoon.

Given 20/20 hindsight you could argue that it would give you cover for Libya, but that's a bit harsh!
Rector16 is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 16:33
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not at night!
A2QFI is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 17:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice post to lighten the tone Spurlash

Rengineer; the answer to your question is mired in years of procurement politics
Geehovah is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 18:47
  #17 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Geehovah
Nice post to lighten the tone Spurlash

Rengineer; the answer to your question is mired in years of procurement politics
years of international procurement politics

and at least it has a gun
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 19:45
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lancashire
Age: 48
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's a bloomin expensive way of getting rid of MBTs and APCs. Surely something along the lines of a GAU-8 would be cheaper per mission?
Not nearly as potentially expensive as entering the MANPAD threat range with your GAU-8. (Not that it's a UK option)

I'd like to know whether Brimstone has been guided using mmW in Libya, be interesting to see whether it works as advertised in that regard and whether Toyota pickups are in their data bank.
Thelma Viaduct is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 19:53
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Europe
Age: 55
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Rector! Put that way, it makes sense.
Rengineer is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2011, 07:47
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kilmarnock,United Kingdom
Age: 68
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Libya: RAF Typhoon fighters carry out first ever attack - Telegraph

Was this really the case?
draken55 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.