Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF training cuts leave Typhoons idle

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF training cuts leave Typhoons idle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Apr 2011, 12:11
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Jungle
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I thought, the GR4s would be laser designating the Typhoon bombs in.
Foghorn Leghorn is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2011, 14:43
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Foghorn Leghorn wrote

As I thought, the GR4s would be l@ser designating the Typhoon bombs in.
Why did you think that though? The Typhoon can self designate. If the GR4s assisted then it is simply team work rather than a deficiency on type. See following page discussing the issue.

http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...onkers-28.html

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2011, 15:13
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Jungle
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TEEJ, it would appear that you have misunderstood me. I questioned whether the Tornado GR4s were laser designating Typhoon bombs. It would appear to be the case that Tornado GR4s are target marking. I was not saying it was a deficiency of the Typhoon, merely that the Tornado GR4s were laser designating for them.
Foghorn Leghorn is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2011, 15:20
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Racedo blows goats
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Possibly for very good reasons as well
engineer(retard) is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2011, 15:26
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Jungle
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are the reasons engineer(retard)? It would be interesting to know.
Foghorn Leghorn is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2011, 15:42
  #26 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Foghorn, you lost me 3 posts back.

as I thought, the GR4s would be laser designating
is a statement of the truth?

TEEEJ said:

Why did you think that though?
which is what I thought.

you replied:

I questioned whether the Tornado GR4s were laser designating Typhoon bombs. It would appear to be the case that Tornado GR4s are target marking
Where is it stated that the GR4s are marking for the Typhoon? I missed that somewhere.

Then Retard appears to back this up with:

probably for very good reasons
I can suggest that a split marker/bomber solution can work well if the marker has to go low to designate as the bomber can remain high, have a reduced fuel burn, and achieve a greater TV.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2011, 15:47
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Racedo blows goats
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you can, I suggest that you talk to aircrew that have done co-operative designation and ask why in certain circumstances it is the method of choice. It is not a topic I would post on in open forums.
engineer(retard) is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2011, 15:58
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Jungle
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PN, sorry if I confused you, I might have been reading between the lines a little from the other thread that's running with this too, the bonkers harrier thread, and thought that the Tornado GR4s were laser designating for the Typhoon bombs.

Thanks for your suggestion of split designating bombing. If the designator is low level, would this not put him in the high threat area and, additionally, would it be a problem with a bomb coming through his height/exploding on the target with the laser designating aircraft getting close to the target? Just some quick thoughts. Is co-operative designation bombing what PN wrote about? I assume it also increases the comms and timing workload between the aircraft and potentially cause more errors? It seems it would be wiser for the Typhoons to self designate their own bombs
Foghorn Leghorn is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2011, 16:36
  #29 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
FH, fratricide is an issue but one easily avoided. The low man can remain above manpad height and the ML SAM is probably neutralised by now. While EO is capable of high resolution at altitude low cloud can negate that thus offering a better eyeball effect.

The Typhoon prefers much higher altitudes than the Tonka.

Certainly it would result in more comms and higher workload except that it would relieve the Typhoon pilot from doing the search and acquire bit - a 3-man or 1.5-man cockpit

and a disclaimer, I am purely speculating and have no direct experience except from the weapons course 30 years ago which went into laser techniques in great detail.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2011, 15:04
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Foghorn Leghorn,

Apologies if I misunderstood your post. Thanks for the reply.

In regards to Typhoon and Litening pod. The MoD has released some images of Typhoon in Italy carrying Paveway II.

Interesting that no Litening Pod is fitted on Typhoon, serial ZJ924? The centre-line stores position is empty. Usually a fuel tank or Litening pod is carried.

Link to Typhoon images that are too large for the forum.

http://www.raf.mod.uk/rafcms/mediafi...llery8_big.jpg

http://www.raf.mod.uk/rafcms/mediafi...llery9_big.jpg

From

RAF - Typhoon and Tornado

Enhanced Paveway II is dual mode with GPS and Laser guided.

http://www.raytheon.com/newsroom/fea...s01_055757.pdf

Looks like they were doing buddy-buddy targeting on a joint Typhoon/Tornado mission? So far there is no footage of the other Typhoon involved in the mission.

RAF - News by Date

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2011, 16:04
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flight international is reporting that tornado is designating for typhoon due to the lack of ground attack qualified typhoon pilots. I guess the extra training to allow the the designation and identification of targets within the ROE is whats limiting factor.
Rulebreaker is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2011, 22:48
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Fletcher Memorial Home
Age: 59
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Somewhat tongue in cheek, it all appears to me to be an inefficient method of delivering LGBs by using two expensive aircraft.

How about fitting a big long rack in the back of a Herc, and filling it with LGBs (think about images of WW2 destroyers and depth charges). The Herc then pootles around the area of choice at altitude, waiting for a designator aircraft to find a target. The designator aircraft marls the target, the Herc flies over at great altitude and they roll a bomb out of the back and into the basket!

Allegedly the precedent was set during the Falklands when dumb bombs were dropped by a similar method. Think of the benefits, loiter time on a Herc is considerably greater than the designator aircraft, so you can put one up and sortie the designators. Also the number of LGBs the Herc could carry would be greater than any other single aircraft.

Only one drawback, we don't have any spare Hercs!

Hang on, what's that black car pulling up outside my house.......
Ogre is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2011, 00:05
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: St. John's Wood
Posts: 322
Received 24 Likes on 4 Posts
... it all appears to me to be an inefficient method of delivering LGBs by using two expensive aircraft.
So, to clarify, your suggested method substitutes one of those "expensive aircraft" for a cheap, dirty, smelly Herc? Have I got that right?
Abbey Road is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2011, 11:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Fletcher Memorial Home
Age: 59
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Abbey Road

Exactly, instead of using a two souped up touring cars racing around to deliver a limited payload, we use several touring cars to spot the delivery points and an articulated lorry to make the deliveries.
Ogre is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2011, 12:22
  #35 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Ogre, and even before the Falklands we had the Argosy bomber. IIRC it could carry 4x1000lb under each wing.

Getting airborne was something else again.
Pontius Navigator is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.