Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Mar 2013, 21:41
  #1401 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Canberra
Posts: 244
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
but it is an interceptor too!

...the F35 [is] a strike fighter not an interceptor and I doubt anybody is dumb enough to try and use one as such.


The RAAF was proposing a solely F35 fleet.

Now it will be mixed with the (currently) 24 SH. The SH was the replacement (sort of) for the F111, not the F/A18

cheers
layman
layman is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2013, 23:24
  #1402 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by keesje
Of course the Australians didn't start their own program...
But...but...you said...
Originally Posted by keesje
...and it becomes clear countries like Australia, Japan, Taiwan are getting nervous and have started their own, independent programs...
What "independant program" is Taiwan doing by the way?

Originally Posted by keesje
Even the frigg'n Iranians are developping a light stealth fighter.
I'm sorry...you call that fibreglass mockup joke of a thing they did, a development?
Originally Posted by keesje
The Japanese are starting to loose their patience begging for F22s.
Ummm...but F-22 production ended in 2012, and the Japanese ordered the F-35 in 2011...so when will they lose patience begging for the F-22?

Quit while you're ahe...behind Keesje!

Last edited by FoxtrotAlpha18; 25th Mar 2013 at 23:25.
FoxtrotAlpha18 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 00:42
  #1403 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 46 Posts
12 (of 75?) F-35Bs for Singapore Soonish?

Singapore Poised To Announce Purchase Of 12 F-35Bs By Colin Clark 25 March 2013

Singapore Poised To Announce Purchase Of 12 F-35Bs

"WASHINGTON: Singapore is expected to announce sometime in the next 10 days that it plans to buy its first squadron --12 planes -- of some 75 of Lockheed Martin's F-35Bs,
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 00:51
  #1404 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Age: 64
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

I am still going with Project Cancelled.

Single engine.

Can't land where it doesn't burn up the ground.

Cannot be fitted with an arrester hook.

Stealth = overated.

And, very very very expensive.

Cancel it and build/buy something more practical.
Stuffy is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 01:46
  #1405 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A lot closer to the sea
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stuffy,

So was Harrier.

Not true.

It's a STOVL jet, no need for a hook. If you need a hook buy F-35C.

Ask a pilot, would you rather have it or not have it doing the sort of missions envisaged? If it gives them a better chance of surviving I'd suggest they'll want it.

Maybe you have a point on this one.

What other jets do you know that can go off a ski jump that are politically acceptable to UK?
WhiteOvies is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 02:06
  #1406 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Age: 64
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

It's a pile of expensive junk. A Corporate toy.

The Sukhoi uses a ski jump.

WTF ????

What does politically acceptable mean ?

Strewth, give me strength.
Stuffy is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 03:05
  #1407 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my opinion this is excellent news. I personally can not see F35 being cancelled. This buy only goes on to strengthen the case of the aircraft, globally and in the Pacific.

The UK is correct to continue with the purchase of the Lightning II, it will be a formidable platform for many years to come operating from the maritime and land environment.



FNS
flynavysomerset is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 06:32
  #1408 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF Marham to be the base for the next generation of fast jet strike aircraft - News - Eastern Daily Press

Mr Hammon said Marham had always been the first choice to be home for the Lightning II.

He said the joint strike fighter will be based at Marham as part of a combined RAF and Royal Naval force which would operate the aircraft both from land bases and future aircraft carriers.

“That’s extremely good news for this station, extremely good news for this community and extremely good news for the RAF and Royal Navy.

I know you will share with me the excitement of having the world’s most advanced fighter aircraft based here and operating from here.”
JSFfan is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 10:20
  #1409 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sorry...you call that fibreglass mockup joke of a thing they did, a development?
The Iranians themselves said it was just a mock-up during the broadcast (not uncommon for new programs). "Don't let the facts ruin a good story"

What "independant program" is Taiwan doing by the way?
Taiwan to Seek Development of an Indigenous Stealth Fighter | Defense Update - Military Technology & Defense News

Quit while you're ahe...behind FoxtrotAlpha18
keesje is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 12:22
  #1410 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,224
Received 409 Likes on 255 Posts
That's funny, Peter, the close air support I worked and helped coordinate for our own and coalition forces in Afghanistan included Warthogs. The ground commanders I worked directly with always wanted more Warthog.

What were you saying, again?

Last edited by Lonewolf_50; 26th Mar 2013 at 12:24.
Lonewolf_50 is online now  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 19:47
  #1411 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looks like Commander Ward doesn't like the F-35 in his latest missive from Sharkeys World

Commander Ward on the F-35

Coff.
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 19:59
  #1412 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Saltash
Posts: 151
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know this has been mentioned before. B.a.e to produce a naval Typhoon, create and safeguard jobs and get in my opinion a better aircraft.
4eyed anorak is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 20:31
  #1413 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Secret base, SW
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting executive summary - his beloved Harrier wouldn't do too well against his criteria...
ian176 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 21:08
  #1414 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Indeed not, Ian. The SHAR fails on almost every point. But you have to be fascinated by a guy who's blogs have an executive summary. I did try to put JSFfan up against him a while back, but there was no interest. Maybe he wasn't so sure of his ground after all.

I'm sure the Minister will read Sharkey's 'paper' with interest.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 22:25
  #1415 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Given that only one appears to have been lost during and since OIF, I'd treat that with a fair amount of suspicion.

Op Desert Storm had four Hog losses, mostly to MANPADS and SHORAD.
Ok, maybe I'm mistaken, but I'd though I'd read it here that the A-10 was withdrawn due to vulnerability to manpads.
peter we is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 22:35
  #1416 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know this has been mentioned before. B.a.e to produce a naval Typhoon, create and safeguard jobs and get in my opinion a better aircraft.
I think the RAfale might be more practicle. The French could be asked to compensate the jobs otherwise e.g. Merlins
keesje is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 16:23
  #1417 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stuffy wrote,

Cannot be fitted with an arrester hook.
Stuffy,
Your reply to WhiteOvies shows that you don't understand the F-35 variants. The only variant fitted for arrested carrier recovery is the F-35C. You do understand why the F-35B doesn't require an arrester hook? Did you also want a hook on the Harrier?

https://www.f35.com/the-f-35/f-35-ov...35b-stovl.aspx

https://www.f35.com/the-f-35/f-35-ov.../f-35c-cv.aspx

F-35C

The aircraft is designed to operate from large aircraft carriers using catapult launch and arrested recovery.
https://www.f35.com/the-f-35/f-35-ov...role-variants/
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 19:21
  #1418 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Former USN chief suggests DOD should cancel F-35A in favour of C-model

Another senior official also says CAPE is looking at eliminating the A-model. "During the latest sequestration drill, CAPE took another run on cutting out one of the variants of the JSF," he says.
"The argument is the air force should do it and buy the C version. I went through that drill before, but it lost legs."



Additionally, three former officials also say their information suggests CAPE is once again examining the cancellation of the F-35A model jet.
CAPE had previously studied terminating the F-35A at the behest of then-undersecretary of defense for acquisitions, technology and logistics John Young, during his tenure which ended in 2009.
Former USN chief suggests DOD should cancel F-35A in favour of C-model

No need to ask any allies, or even consider their interests.

IMO Europe needs it own next generation fighter bomber.
keesje is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 19:35
  #1419 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,738
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
And at the same time.....

But Air Force pilots dismiss the idea of flying a heavier fighter jet, and instead propose that the Marine Corps abandon its version, the F-35B, arguing that its costly helicopter-style landing feature is useful only at air shows.


Prices soar, enthusiasm dives for F-35 Lightning; pilots worry about visibility problem - Washington Times

GeeRam is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 21:29
  #1420 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Pentagon super fighter will get pilots shot down, warns report - Washington Times

The report shows that the F-35A “is flawed beyond redemption,” commented POGO staffer and veteran defense spending analyst Winslow Wheeler.
und

Prices soar, enthusiasm dives for F-35 Lightning; pilots worry about visibility problem - Washington Times

Pentagon officials have said in audit reports that the F-35’s 30-year, $1 trillion operating bill is not affordable.
Like the song says it's a long way to the top.............


Last edited by glad rag; 27th Mar 2013 at 21:30.
glad rag is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.