BBMF & Arrows
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BBMF & Arrows
All
Sorry for invading your space, civi here...
I have allways been a huge proponent of BBMF and the arrows.
However, it looks as though a large axe is just around the corner.
I would love to see both parties survive and florish.
However you guys are "in the know" and I wondered what you think.
Thanks for your thoughts............
Sorry for invading your space, civi here...
I have allways been a huge proponent of BBMF and the arrows.
However, it looks as though a large axe is just around the corner.
I would love to see both parties survive and florish.
However you guys are "in the know" and I wondered what you think.
Thanks for your thoughts............
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Another S**thole
Age: 51
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Both will survive for vary reasons:-
RAFAT is still a great PR/Recruitment tool with links to industry including some corporate sponsorship.
BBMF is a 'museum without walls' and remains a tribute to the tens of thousands of young airman and support staff who perished during the Second World War. Last estimates put the total annual cost of BBMF at only £3M, most of which is regained through insurance costs paid by venue organisers.
If we really think that chopping both is going to magically fix the hole in the defence budget we are sorely mistaken - both outfits fulfill important roles.
Although if I had a choice then the Reds would go - BBMF cost peanuts and are a permanent reminder of sacrifices made.
"Lest we Forget"
RAFAT is still a great PR/Recruitment tool with links to industry including some corporate sponsorship.
BBMF is a 'museum without walls' and remains a tribute to the tens of thousands of young airman and support staff who perished during the Second World War. Last estimates put the total annual cost of BBMF at only £3M, most of which is regained through insurance costs paid by venue organisers.
If we really think that chopping both is going to magically fix the hole in the defence budget we are sorely mistaken - both outfits fulfill important roles.
Although if I had a choice then the Reds would go - BBMF cost peanuts and are a permanent reminder of sacrifices made.
"Lest we Forget"
Reds support the drive for defence exports sales
Would it be more expensive to have (say) a four-ship Typhoon display team, than the current Hawk setup?
BBMF will never be chopped.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
A natural breakpoint for the Reds would be at the end of the Hawk life although I believe they have sufficient airframes for some time yet.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wibble, nr Wibble
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The survival of both is dependant on understanding the value of things and not just their cost
I have more faith in our new government in having a social conscience to this
I have more faith in our new government in having a social conscience to this
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was speaking to an old n' bold CT on the 'Dead Sparrows' at Akrotiri a few weeks back and he was pretty certain that once the Hawk runs out of hours then it's curtains for the display team.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: norfolk
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 'old and bold' may be talking sense, as once the Hawk goes, what would replace it, unless some one starts on it's replacement soon, but saying that, with the reductions being mooted, maybe there will not be enough frames to display and train so perhaps they will have to combine flights, train the U/T pilots on the way to and from the display sites with the main man taking over for the event !!!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The allocation of a support C130 as a high priority always used to astound me more than the cost of the Reds themselves, especially as many airshows would pay a lot for the latter. I seem to remember a C17 was allocated in support of at least one fairly lengthy overseas jolly and the use of such a scarce AT asset is far more scandalous than the actual cost. I've also seen a brass band flown on a C130 to Cyprus on the same day SF failed to get a C130 for a qualifying para jump, so the cash side is the least of our worries...
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
once the Hawk goes, what would replace it, unless some one starts on it's replacement soon, but saying that, with the reductions being mooted, maybe there will not be enough frames to display and train so perhaps they will have to combine flights, train the U/T pilots on the way to and from the display sites with the main man taking over for the event !!!
Your training solution should not be needed as they train in the closed season.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for the Reds I am sure there will be a few options on the table from keeping as is to reducing the number of aircraft in the display team, perhaps even changing the aircraft to a cheaper version (running costs), dare I say a turbo prop trainer.
As someone pointed out early it will be down to cost vs. value.
As someone pointed out early it will be down to cost vs. value.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would have thought the obvous answer would be to eventually re-equip the Red's with the 128 Hawk, still a good export earner...
Warships do a lot of export work on overseas visits, not quite sure what the Army do, must be something positive beyond encouraging Kalashnikov sales... ( Joke, great respect ).
Even better if the Reds could have Hawk 200 single seaters, which would also be useful to the RAF, but I've met serving light blue pilots who don't even know such an aircraft exists - and other fairly high ranking who were begging for it -, and it ain't gonna happen, besides, no rides for groundcrew ( important ) or banana republic types ( could be handled by BAES ).
As for any mention of binning the BBMF ( whose cost is more than covered by comfy chairs and plasma telly's for civil serpents ) - I would be one of very many getting hold of a gun or at least a bat with a nail through it and striding towards Downing Street !
Warships do a lot of export work on overseas visits, not quite sure what the Army do, must be something positive beyond encouraging Kalashnikov sales... ( Joke, great respect ).
Even better if the Reds could have Hawk 200 single seaters, which would also be useful to the RAF, but I've met serving light blue pilots who don't even know such an aircraft exists - and other fairly high ranking who were begging for it -, and it ain't gonna happen, besides, no rides for groundcrew ( important ) or banana republic types ( could be handled by BAES ).
As for any mention of binning the BBMF ( whose cost is more than covered by comfy chairs and plasma telly's for civil serpents ) - I would be one of very many getting hold of a gun or at least a bat with a nail through it and striding towards Downing Street !
Last edited by Double Zero; 21st Jun 2010 at 13:23.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Get rid of the AEF way before either of these two/QUOTE]
I heard recently that as a result of the Swansea accident, the maximum age to fly will become 55. Anyone else heard that rumour?
I heard recently that as a result of the Swansea accident, the maximum age to fly will become 55. Anyone else heard that rumour?
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reds are not getting the 128. Much more difficult to service meaning they would need a larger fleet in order to guarantee displays. Having spent several years at Scampton sipping beer with the guys, I'm confident that the Reds will be disbanded once the current fleet is lifed. 2018 is the number in the air. Ties in nicely with the 100th anniversary of the RAF.
Huge shame really as the annual running cost is vey low at £5-6M
Huge shame really as the annual running cost is vey low at £5-6M
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Huge shame really as the annual running cost is vey low at £5-6M
Notwithstanding that, the £5-6m PA figure is rubbish. The capitation rates just don't add up to make £5-6m.
It costs Circa £9m just to operate the aircraft.
Last edited by vecvechookattack; 21st Jun 2010 at 14:55.
I was speaking to an old n' bold CT on the 'Dead Sparrows' at Akrotiri a few weeks back and he was pretty certain that once the Hawk runs out of hours then it's curtains for the display team.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Much as I would hate to see the demise of the 'Reds' in their present form, two options spring to mind:
1. More sponsorship from British industry.
2. Take a leaf out of the RAAF book and have the 'Reds' as a secondary role for Vachchlley Instructors.
Option 1 would preserve the important overseas displays.
Option 2 has been done before, vide 'Yellowjacks.'
1. More sponsorship from British industry.
2. Take a leaf out of the RAAF book and have the 'Reds' as a secondary role for Vachchlley Instructors.
Option 1 would preserve the important overseas displays.
Option 2 has been done before, vide 'Yellowjacks.'
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Glesga, Scotland
Age: 51
Posts: 230
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please forgive my ignorance,but would the Euro fighter not be a good replacement for the hawks at the end of there life?
While I appriciate they are dearer to to buy and run. But the "reds" have always been marketed as a good sales pitch for the UK and BAe, is it not a good combination to use maybe earlier Tranche's so the Tranche 3 versions could be purchesed??
And when out of display season they revert to Uk defense or Op's ???
Once again appoliges if a stupid idea .
While I appriciate they are dearer to to buy and run. But the "reds" have always been marketed as a good sales pitch for the UK and BAe, is it not a good combination to use maybe earlier Tranche's so the Tranche 3 versions could be purchesed??
And when out of display season they revert to Uk defense or Op's ???
Once again appoliges if a stupid idea .