Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Defence review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Feb 2010, 07:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Defence review

I was stunned to hear on the news this AM that the words 'aircraft carriers' (2) had actually survived this far. Dare we hope?
BOAC is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2010, 08:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,821
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Plenty of jobs-for-Jocks involved in those 2 white elephants, so are you surprised?

Although it is heartening to read that they might get air groups worthy of the name - assuming the F-35B programme survives. But if it doesn't.....
BEagle is online now  
Old 1st Feb 2010, 08:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First paragraph of The Times article:

Gordon Brown will put two new aircraft carriers at the heart of his vision for the military this week as he commits Labour to billions of pounds of extra defence spending.
Headline-grabbing, vote-buying (with your money) politics? Or is he now at the stage he can promise whatever he likes, knowing that he will never have to fulfil those promises? And Gordon Brown's "vision for the military"? Even the phrase fills me with dread.

Second paragraph of article:

At the same time, defence chiefs are exploring how closer military links with France and the potential benefits of an entente cordiale could tackle future dangers with limited resources.
QED.
Ray Dahvectac is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2010, 08:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 36 Likes on 14 Posts
At the same time, defence chiefs are exploring how closer military links with France and the potential benefits of an entente cordiale could tackle future dangers with limited resources.
Maybe they will be able to supply all the white flags necessary, as we will be unable to defend ourselves in the event any attack lasts more than 5 days.
ZH875 is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2010, 08:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Aylesbury
Age: 58
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im inclined to agree, this is just purely political. He knows he's not going to be held to it.

As for closer ties with the French... yessssssssss...... isnt that what NATO is for? Or is it another way of pushing along the idea of the European Defence Force under disguise?
Jabba_TG12 is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2010, 09:00
  #6 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just as long as Les Francais understand that we may not be able to help if there is fog in the channel and they may be cut off.

EDIT: Apologies to all - just seen there was a thread running already - glasses all steamed up

Last edited by BOAC; 1st Feb 2010 at 10:43.
BOAC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.