Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

"RAF Apache" attacked with £8 Torch

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

"RAF Apache" attacked with £8 Torch

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Oct 2009, 16:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Registered User **
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wales
Age: 44
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"RAF Apache" attacked with £8 Torch

This is our normal troll.
Dave-exfairy is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2009, 17:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: -
Age: 54
Posts: 240
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
I suppose the difference is that technically the Apache crew aren't allowed to shoot back at a bloke in the UK, but should the Taliban wish to illuminate their position I am sure that they would return the favour with a hail of ammo.
skydiver69 is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2009, 18:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps "technically" they would be better improving their public communications first
glad rag is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2009, 18:14
  #4 (permalink)  
Fat Chris
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Glad Rag, you've moved the discussion on well there.

Just because the war isn't on your doorstep, doesn't mean that the forces involved don't have to train, sometimes at the expense of a bit of 'peace and quiet'. It's not the Blitz and there aren't hordes of Taliban queueing up to invade but please get yourself a little perspective.

I'd like a bit of clarification on the 'back garden' claim. Smells a bit like an exaggeration.

Nimbys..............
 
Old 18th Oct 2009, 18:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course what wasn't mentioned in the news article I saw on TV was the actual effect such an item has on NVGs. Neither was any time spent examining how long this guy spent shining his torch at the helo (and who's to say it was actually that torch he used rather than one of those 'night sun' jobs?).

I also noticed him mutter under his breath that he thought it might be 'another of those bloomin helicopters' (or words to that effect).

I just think there's a bit more to this than meets the eye (no pun intended).

STH
SirToppamHat is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2009, 18:52
  #6 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave-exfairy
The RAF have started flying Apache helicopters, is this some secret squadron? Or is this another shocking lapse in journalists?
Oh do keep up. If it is wearing DPM or CS95 or whatever it is ARMY. If it flies and has roundels it is RAF. If it is a troop transport aircraft is will be a US C130.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2009, 19:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like this chap is a bit confused. He says he thought he heard an earthquake, and then later used his torch to identify it. Now I may not be an expert in the subject, but I were looking for an earthquake then I would look towards the ground (hoping the word "earth" in the name was a clue).

Plus if the helicopter was only ten feet above the ground, at least he would not have strained his neck, as it would have only been about five feet above his eye level!!!, which is also odd as I noticed he did not complain about any damage to his property from the downwash.
barnstormer1968 is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2009, 20:38
  #8 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by barnstormer1968
Sounds like this chap is a bit confused. He says he thought he heard an earthquake, and then later used his torch to identify it. Now I may not be an expert in the subject, but I were looking for an earthquake then I would look towards the ground (hoping the word "earth" in the name was a clue).

Plus if the helicopter was only ten feet above the ground, at least he would not have strained his neck, as it would have only been about five feet above his eye level!!!, which is also odd as I noticed he did not complain about any damage to his property from the downwash.
Oh do keep up. The helicopter was BELOW him, he was in his bedroom.

Now perhaps the helo was making like Blue Thunder and using its super high powered optics to see what he was doin in his bedroom. What ther had neglected to do was switch in their whisper mode.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2009, 20:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What ther had neglected to do was switch in their whisper mode.
Presumably they forgot to think in russian!
Duma is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2009, 21:16
  #10 (permalink)  
Fat Chris
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
And what does it have to do with anything that this individual has unfortunately been allowed to spawn not one but TWO more generations of nimbys?

The grandfather used the torch to identify the aircraft.
And, it seems, he has a special, aircraft-identifying torch.
 
Old 18th Oct 2009, 21:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WSM
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it's possible to ask a serious question amongst all the wisecracks then can I ask if a torch really poses a flight safety risk given the minimum height restrictions in force?
endplay is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2009, 22:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In a control room with no radar...
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Merriott, who owns a theatrical lighting firm, insists he did not put the aircraft at risk as he has had professional experience of lighting up flying helicopters at a Buckingham Palace event hosted by the Queen.

Jesus christ

I once threw a dart and got bullseye, so obviously everytime in the future I throw a dart I'll do the same
Scott Diamond is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2009, 22:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Between Chippenham and Wooton Bassett
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You should see my 'torch'.... No, really, it's got a handle, but I generally leave it at home, as it takes up too much space in the car boot.

Maybe the crews tend to fly a little low in some areas, but obviously, you shouldn't shine lights/lasers at any aircraft anywhere.. record the incident, with the exact time, and match it with the flightplan/track later.
Photoplanet is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2009, 22:24
  #14 (permalink)  
Flintstone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No, no, no. You're going about this the wrong way.

Firstly, you're taking the story at face value. Whatever this web-toed idiot told them there's no guarantee they accurately reproduced it in their tissue of lie..................... sorry, article.

Secondly, he's clearly talking b0llocks. As barnstormer pointed out this would be the first earthquake in history to take place above the, erm.....earth. SirToppam has picked on probably the only certainty in the whole tale which is that there's more to this than meets the eye. A long running grievance would be my guess.

Wouldn't want to be in his shoes when the "RAF" take their revenge.
 
Old 18th Oct 2009, 22:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: devon
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I liked the line about him 'having professionally lit helicopters in the past' too.

I'm guessing he didn't do it with a torch worth six quid that he got for eight quid when he bought 12 litres of sainsburys finest petrol and, and I may be going out on a limb here, the helicopter he 'professionally lit' probably wasn't bristling with all sorts of optical sensor goodies and flown by a guy wearing night vision goggles who likes his retinas where they are thankyouverymuch.

Tosser.
arandcee is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2009, 04:23
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mind it was a lot more fun in the eighties before the bases where closed. A10s on finals where quite acceptable to our border collie...not even a whimper from him as the porkers passed over. Now, F4s or those "pointed stubby wing things" he would go mental. Did,nt need a torch, old Max could spot em a mile off. Apache,s......nah....Too damn quiet round here these days. He would not even drop his "chewit" for one of them..........
Lancastrian is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2009, 04:29
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oberbayern
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
aaah ... but that was the 80's.

Back in the 60's, the headmistress of a local school (who lived on short finals) filed a complaint alleging that "the pilots are changing gear (shifting into fine pitch) to keep me awake and using their lights to look into my bedroom window."

What a dreamer. If she'd been 30 years younger, perhaps ... but we had other things to do.
Manuel de Vol is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2009, 07:20
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Inverness-shire
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gents

from a strictly civvie point of view, it there was a f******* great din going on in the dark, in or near my back garden, I would also be inclined to grab a torch & try to find out what was going on.

Wouldn't you?

And to end up in a cell for 9 hours because you don't know that someone out there is wearing night vision enhancing equipment that doesn't like a torch (not a laser) shone at it sounds a bit OTT to me.


P.S. I've got an electric welding mask that auto-darkens when I strike the spark. It cost £80. Doesn't million squid military NVG stuff have something similar built-in? If it doesn't, I'll put my mask in the mail.

Will now run for cover

Last edited by astir 8; 19th Oct 2009 at 08:20.
astir 8 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2009, 07:27
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In all fairness, just seen the interview on Anglia and it does appear like a bit of over-reaction by the authorities. The chap was genuinly trying to ascertain what the hell was going on I think. Now if it had been my garden,...a simply Northen wave with a F*** OFF would have brought swift resolution But,....thats the old bill....deserve Oscars ...really do.
Lancastrian is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2009, 08:24
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,828
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
There's a lot of difference, as you say, between trying to find out what had caused the noise by flashing a torch around and deliberately targetting an aircraft with a high powered la.ser.

This does indeed sound like rather an overreaction.

Back in the '70s, the mayor of some German town heard that the 'bona mates' of the Harrier force were leaving Wildenrath and that Phantoms were to be stationed there instead. So, full of self-importance, he wrote to his colleague in Holland suggesting that they should both lodge an official complaint.

The reply from Cloggyland was along the lines of "Yes, we know that Phantoms and indeed Harriers are both very noisy. But we prefer that noise to the sound of the Stuka......"
BEagle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.