BEagle
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BEagle
You said:
RETENTION INCENTIVES FOR NON-OFFICER AIRCREW ARE INDEED BEING FORMULATED!
Sorry to shout, but please rest assured that you are NOT being shafted. They simply can't do everything at once and this first announcement is to target areas where manning levels are the most critical!
I said
substantiate 'most critical'. Facts please. . .Come on Beags, or any one else for that matter; ‘cos I feel a real tit not being able to work it out.
RETENTION INCENTIVES FOR NON-OFFICER AIRCREW ARE INDEED BEING FORMULATED!
Sorry to shout, but please rest assured that you are NOT being shafted. They simply can't do everything at once and this first announcement is to target areas where manning levels are the most critical!
I said
substantiate 'most critical'. Facts please. . .Come on Beags, or any one else for that matter; ‘cos I feel a real tit not being able to work it out.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They have promised us for the best part of a year now that we would ALL know by the end of 2001, ooh er then early 2002.
Not once did the lying, cheating, spineless, goal post moving "Airships" tell us that the rear crew NCO's would not be getting a financial incentive at the same time as the "O's". They must have known for months and elected to say nothing.
Screw'em
AAC NCO types are included, why not us as PROMISED.
Not once did the lying, cheating, spineless, goal post moving "Airships" tell us that the rear crew NCO's would not be getting a financial incentive at the same time as the "O's". They must have known for months and elected to say nothing.
Screw'em
AAC NCO types are included, why not us as PROMISED.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: TheDarkSide
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cheaps,
According to the findings by the ARRWG... ."Furthermore the recommendations are targeted to resolve retention difficulties and there is no currently no retention problem with Airman Aircrew; where recruitment is an issue, this will be addressed seperately"
However, they then state "...ALMs will fall into manning balance within 3-4 yrs, but SHORTFALLS remain in other Airman Aircrew cadres, this is being addressed by a vigorous recruiting campaign" . .Apparently the incentive is to bombard you with glossy posters, a web site for AEOps (MS Nimrod Flt Sim 2002!)and the title of WIZZOS!! pep talk on the critical role you all play and a chance to play with ASTOR.
Sounds like a cracking package to me!
Hope this helps! it sure as hell doesnt add up to me. Looks like they are saying you get no dosh because no one is PVRing and no one wants to be NCO Aircrew...giz us a job mate!!
According to the findings by the ARRWG... ."Furthermore the recommendations are targeted to resolve retention difficulties and there is no currently no retention problem with Airman Aircrew; where recruitment is an issue, this will be addressed seperately"
However, they then state "...ALMs will fall into manning balance within 3-4 yrs, but SHORTFALLS remain in other Airman Aircrew cadres, this is being addressed by a vigorous recruiting campaign" . .Apparently the incentive is to bombard you with glossy posters, a web site for AEOps (MS Nimrod Flt Sim 2002!)and the title of WIZZOS!! pep talk on the critical role you all play and a chance to play with ASTOR.
Sounds like a cracking package to me!
Hope this helps! it sure as hell doesnt add up to me. Looks like they are saying you get no dosh because no one is PVRing and no one wants to be NCO Aircrew...giz us a job mate!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what is there that will be rattled of as the next level between arrrgghhhh, or whatever, and the. .Armed Forces’. .Pay Review Body. .Thirty-First Report 2002. .Chairman: The Rt. Hon. Baroness Dean. .of Thornton-le-Fylde?
Is it not all done. Please tell. I really want to believe………
Is it not all done. Please tell. I really want to believe………
Sorry, I haven't yet had a chance to digest the whole presentation; however I remain convinced that, although these first retention incentives will be primarily targetted at those groups where manpower shortage is the most serious, non-Officer aircrew retention will NOT be ignored. The ARRWG has worked pretty hard to achieve this first result, many things have been achieved (presently restricted to Officer aircrew, I admit) which have long been sought.
Speak to your Personnel folk tomorrow and just ask them to establish what the estimated timetable for a parallel retention incentive announcement for non-Officer aircrew will be. They are there to help you, after all.......
[ 29 January 2002: Message edited by: BEagle ]</p>
Speak to your Personnel folk tomorrow and just ask them to establish what the estimated timetable for a parallel retention incentive announcement for non-Officer aircrew will be. They are there to help you, after all.......
[ 29 January 2002: Message edited by: BEagle ]</p>
Please consult the experts for the facts; we were told that it's the critical shortage of pilots and navigators which this first retention package is aimed at. I don't know any more than that. Sorry. But I most certainly do believe CAS' sincerity in aiming to recruit and retain those who we need to be able to project Air Power.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 2nd biggest country in world
Age: 55
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What happened to all those navigators we had so many of in the 90's and took over doing the Loadies job on SH?
I've left because I could see that us (I speak as an ex) SNCO aircrew were going to be shaffted again and again........... "Oh it will get better boys.....they are doind a review for you as well as us ........" Oh how many times did I hear that.
SH, SAR, Fixed Wing transport, Maritime..... how are these going to function if you continue to Pi&& off the Airmen Aircrew.
I've left because I could see that us (I speak as an ex) SNCO aircrew were going to be shaffted again and again........... "Oh it will get better boys.....they are doind a review for you as well as us ........" Oh how many times did I hear that.
SH, SAR, Fixed Wing transport, Maritime..... how are these going to function if you continue to Pi&& off the Airmen Aircrew.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BEagle
"we were told........." by who?
I've 'been told' that the only aircraft left on the ground after a 'launch the fleet' today, right now, would be wanting a SNCO for full mission spec (Not an IF trip for hours building).
Who's right? Who's spin? Who's putting up with it past their option?
You can put who you want in the back of your' aeroplane, but if you spoke to the front end in SH/SAR they might say they're looking for more than the monkey they're going to end up with.
[ 29 January 2002: Message edited by: cheapseat ]
Worked out what the little button things do. Now realise lucky to have job. Thanks.....
[ 29 January 2002: Message edited by: cheapseat ]
Oh that's right, should it be spoke or speak? There you go eh? I do give my (little} flying pay to op capt so it's not all a lost cuase eh?
[ 29 January 2002: Message edited by: cheapseat ]</p>
"we were told........." by who?
I've 'been told' that the only aircraft left on the ground after a 'launch the fleet' today, right now, would be wanting a SNCO for full mission spec (Not an IF trip for hours building).
Who's right? Who's spin? Who's putting up with it past their option?
You can put who you want in the back of your' aeroplane, but if you spoke to the front end in SH/SAR they might say they're looking for more than the monkey they're going to end up with.
[ 29 January 2002: Message edited by: cheapseat ]
Worked out what the little button things do. Now realise lucky to have job. Thanks.....
[ 29 January 2002: Message edited by: cheapseat ]
Oh that's right, should it be spoke or speak? There you go eh? I do give my (little} flying pay to op capt so it's not all a lost cuase eh?
[ 29 January 2002: Message edited by: cheapseat ]</p>
lazy fairweather PPRuNer
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Forres,Scotland
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Beagle,
You're missing the point (possibly).
Lets just imagine for one minute that the AA cadre at large do not give a rats @rse about any future minimalist, non-funded retention package.
Lets also imagine that they (AA) fully recognised that the Commissioned aircrew branches were always going to get the lion's share.
While we're at it, try and stretch to the thought that no-one (airman aircrew) ever thought that they'd get......... nothing! Which is what it has amounted to.
For my part, I'm realist enough to know exactly how highly the AARWG (or whatever) value their Airman Aircrew (see all above) and never expected very much from them so have not been disappointed.
However, my point is that if you cannot see what a bitch slap this has all been to us airbourne untermensch then I guess those in the ivory towers never will.
. .P.S. Did you see that Kenneth Branagh prog at the weekend about the Final Solution? Good wer'n'it.
You're missing the point (possibly).
Lets just imagine for one minute that the AA cadre at large do not give a rats @rse about any future minimalist, non-funded retention package.
Lets also imagine that they (AA) fully recognised that the Commissioned aircrew branches were always going to get the lion's share.
While we're at it, try and stretch to the thought that no-one (airman aircrew) ever thought that they'd get......... nothing! Which is what it has amounted to.
For my part, I'm realist enough to know exactly how highly the AARWG (or whatever) value their Airman Aircrew (see all above) and never expected very much from them so have not been disappointed.
However, my point is that if you cannot see what a bitch slap this has all been to us airbourne untermensch then I guess those in the ivory towers never will.
. .P.S. Did you see that Kenneth Branagh prog at the weekend about the Final Solution? Good wer'n'it.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ice station kilo
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jim Nic you are still my saviour.. look out for that jetstream!!. .Post edited to remove inaccurate data posted in haste and anger. Circle kay apologises deeply. <img src="frown.gif" border="0">
[ 30 January 2002: Message edited by: circle kay ]</p>
[ 30 January 2002: Message edited by: circle kay ]</p>
Think Purple; the Army has JNCO pilots - and a Master is not a 'SNCO' as my first Air Engineer would hasten to add! 'Non-Officer' for brevity only.
'We were told' by the Wg Cdr reading CAS' presentation about the ARRWG's targetting. Go to the 'Aircrew Retention Latest' thread and look up one of the links (on page 10) which will take you directly to an approriate .ppt presentation - it's what we were briefed.
'We were told' by the Wg Cdr reading CAS' presentation about the ARRWG's targetting. Go to the 'Aircrew Retention Latest' thread and look up one of the links (on page 10) which will take you directly to an approriate .ppt presentation - it's what we were briefed.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Half way up the stairs is a stair where I sit
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's all a con. They have only included GD Rearcrew so that it can be shown to be all officer aircrew, not just pilots and navs, avoiding another political backlash. And those Officer types not entitled to the bung will have been sweetened with the new Prof Aviator terms. The lack of foresight, however, is quite in character. How many AE's, Eng's, ALM's have 22 yr options between now and 2008? They might be short now, but it's nothing compared to what is on the horizon. But don't worry lads, i'm sure we'll get looked after. Right!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I posted this on another thread in reply to BEagle and feel I should post it here to make sure the apology is received.
"Beagle. .When you say, “all I received was a torrent odd ill-found abuse” if that is how my questions and comments appear to you then I apologise unreservedly.
I know it is certainly a cheek to start a thread in your good name however insult was not my intention. In fact one of my main motives for it was that your name is well respected on this forum.
The point of the thread is that you, like myself have been told about the targeting of the latest retention package, however I can lay down the figures of showing the OVERMANNING of non-GD/P/N aircrew and likewise the under manning of SNCO aircrew. You chose to believe the system and as a man who invariably finds the substance behind the myth with regard most things Royal Air Force I wondered why.
Sorry
Cheapseat by name, mug by profession."
I do stand by what I know to be facts; the chronic shortage of front line SNCO Aircrew and that's before you start looking for ones WITH A MED CAT THAT LETS THEM TAKE OFF.
"Beagle. .When you say, “all I received was a torrent odd ill-found abuse” if that is how my questions and comments appear to you then I apologise unreservedly.
I know it is certainly a cheek to start a thread in your good name however insult was not my intention. In fact one of my main motives for it was that your name is well respected on this forum.
The point of the thread is that you, like myself have been told about the targeting of the latest retention package, however I can lay down the figures of showing the OVERMANNING of non-GD/P/N aircrew and likewise the under manning of SNCO aircrew. You chose to believe the system and as a man who invariably finds the substance behind the myth with regard most things Royal Air Force I wondered why.
Sorry
Cheapseat by name, mug by profession."
I do stand by what I know to be facts; the chronic shortage of front line SNCO Aircrew and that's before you start looking for ones WITH A MED CAT THAT LETS THEM TAKE OFF.
cheapseat - sorry for any misunderstanding; I wasn't accusing you personally of ill-found abuse - that came from others. However thank you for clearing the air.
I am sure that the non-Officer Aircrew manning situation will be carefully reviewed - as it will be for doctors, dentists, engineers....chaplains?? The words 'market forces' were used at the presentation to explain that those being 'pulled' by external forces are being targetted; equally those being 'pushed' will hopefully be retained by the promised 'non-remunerative retention incentives' which will apparently seek to address lifestyle issues.
[ 31 January 2002: Message edited by: BEagle ]</p>
I am sure that the non-Officer Aircrew manning situation will be carefully reviewed - as it will be for doctors, dentists, engineers....chaplains?? The words 'market forces' were used at the presentation to explain that those being 'pulled' by external forces are being targetted; equally those being 'pushed' will hopefully be retained by the promised 'non-remunerative retention incentives' which will apparently seek to address lifestyle issues.
[ 31 January 2002: Message edited by: BEagle ]</p>