Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

When did the British Army lose the 'Royal' prefix?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

When did the British Army lose the 'Royal' prefix?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Dec 2001, 15:24
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Invergordon 1931, Atlantic Fleet.
I once spoke to an old matelot who had been on Warspite at the time. Word was spread by unco-ordinated cheering.

All felt let down by treatment after the event.
Kiting for Boys is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2001, 18:50
  #22 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,832
Received 1,901 Likes on 852 Posts
Post

Spithead & Nore Mutinies. Napoleonic Wars, 1797:
http://www.napoleonguide.com/timeline_c.htm

[ 17 December 2001: Message edited by: ORAC ]
ORAC is online now  
Old 16th Dec 2001, 17:38
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Wiley in his original posting raised a point.
What we know as modern terrorism (ie bombs, back-shooting etc) was initiated by the Israelis - The Stern Gang and Irgun.
The honour of being the first to terrorise
an aircraft carrying civilians goes to the Greek Cypriots (Eoka) Nicosia airport 1957.
Fortunately the fuse was too short.
They were more lucky with the BEA comet at
Athens in 1967 when all were lost.
If anyone remembers him- Doesn't Black Mac resemble OBL??? Swop the black hat for a white one.
outback is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2001, 19:02
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

James' Clavell's hero in Shogun summed up the situation we're discussing here about as neatly as anyone has. (I'm talking about the fictitious 17th century Brit sea captain who takes the Dutch ship to Japan and ends up working as a quasi Samurai for the Japanese warlord).

Early in the book, when questioned by the Japanese warlord about he could justify rebelling against his King, (something the Japanese looks upon with serious misgivings), the Brit gives an answer that says it all. "Can I justify it? Certainly. Because we won."

That answer pretty well explains it all, and continues to be very pertinent to this day.
Wiley is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2001, 00:17
  #25 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,832
Received 1,901 Likes on 852 Posts
Post

Sir John Harington (1561-1612):


Treason doth never prosper - What's the reason?
If it doth prosper, none dare call it treason.
ORAC is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.