201 Sqn to be re-badged?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 480miles south of the Arctic
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
201 Sqn to be re-badged?
Heard a rumour today from a mate on 201 that the Boss plans to drop the words "Flying Boat Sqadron" from the Sqn crest and add "Guernsey's Own".
I know that it is known as "Guernsey's Own" but what a shame, unilaterally changing a sqn's history like that by altering the crest. Bloody young whipper-snappers.
I know that it is known as "Guernsey's Own" but what a shame, unilaterally changing a sqn's history like that by altering the crest. Bloody young whipper-snappers.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
True. It's a good way to unite the squadron
When I was on the Shinies we had just lost our 'B' Flt to centralised servicing but the one sqn Ldr on the sqn was OC "A" Flt. The sqn was 12(B) Sqn.
The boss, as we only had one 'flight' proposed dropping the OC "A" Flt and the 12(B) Sqn until someone pointed out what the (B) meant.
It is quite an education to walk down the gallery at the RAF Club and note the original sqn badges.
When I was on the Shinies we had just lost our 'B' Flt to centralised servicing but the one sqn Ldr on the sqn was OC "A" Flt. The sqn was 12(B) Sqn.
The boss, as we only had one 'flight' proposed dropping the OC "A" Flt and the 12(B) Sqn until someone pointed out what the (B) meant.
It is quite an education to walk down the gallery at the RAF Club and note the original sqn badges.
Not his badge, tis the Queen's. Therefore, not his call
Absolutely right - HM takes a very close interest in such matters, all of which must receive Her personal approval and signature.
Jack
Absolutely right - HM takes a very close interest in such matters, all of which must receive Her personal approval and signature.
Jack
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In fairness to the Boss,
I believe that the official squadron crests (i.e whats on the standards) no longer has "Flying Boat" on. Same as 42 no longer has "Torpedo Bomber" Etc. So he's not changing the Official Sqn Crest.
I still prefer it the way it is now though.
I believe that the official squadron crests (i.e whats on the standards) no longer has "Flying Boat" on. Same as 42 no longer has "Torpedo Bomber" Etc. So he's not changing the Official Sqn Crest.
I still prefer it the way it is now though.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Blighty
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I think he's fully entitled to change the sqn crest in terms of the badge worn by the aircrew... However he's not going to get the sqns flag changed...
Doesn't it read "Squadron" on the flag anyway, no F-B-S...
/me reaches for his "Flying Goat Squadron" badge.
Doesn't it read "Squadron" on the flag anyway, no F-B-S...
/me reaches for his "Flying Goat Squadron" badge.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Penang, Malaysia
Age: 78
Posts: 262
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems that the official crest does indeed include the words "Flying Boat Squadron". See here:
Royal Air Force Heraldry Trust, the Squadron Badges List
Royal Air Force Heraldry Trust, the Squadron Badges List
I seem to recall there was a GAI / DIN a few years back (around the time that XIII Squadron reformed IIRC) that directed that the only squadrons that could include letters after their squadron number on badges (and I mean badges, for the use on flying suit
), letterheads etc were those officiclaly accredited with either being a BofB squadron (F) or an Army Co-operation Sqns (AC). The reasons given, I believe, were that in many instances the letters no longer reflected the true role of that particular squadron. This would not affect the official crest or standard though.
Perhaps someone with a bit more historical knowledge/memory may be able to shed more light on this?
), letterheads etc were those officiclaly accredited with either being a BofB squadron (F) or an Army Co-operation Sqns (AC). The reasons given, I believe, were that in many instances the letters no longer reflected the true role of that particular squadron. This would not affect the official crest or standard though. Perhaps someone with a bit more historical knowledge/memory may be able to shed more light on this?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: off me 'ead
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lauriebe,
From your link:
Royal Air Force Heraldry Trust, the Squadron Badges List
it would suggest that 84 Sqn should have the word 'Bomber' incorporated in the Sqn badge. The badge issued by the College of Arms dated April 1946 and approved by HM King George VI does not have 'Bomber' in it. I would suggest that that link is not the definitive list of RAF Sqn badges.
From your link:
Royal Air Force Heraldry Trust, the Squadron Badges List
it would suggest that 84 Sqn should have the word 'Bomber' incorporated in the Sqn badge. The badge issued by the College of Arms dated April 1946 and approved by HM King George VI does not have 'Bomber' in it. I would suggest that that link is not the definitive list of RAF Sqn badges.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Up North (for now)
Age: 62
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anybody know the Latin for "It's not Ideal". 42 (Torperdo Bomber) Sqn might be looking to change what's at the bottom of our Badge the way things are going at the moment!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 87
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is there a definitive source of Sqdn badges on the net?
Are the 'location' associations, such as ‘Guernsey’s Own’, permanent?
Of personal interest, 214 Sqdn, was ‘214 Federated Malaya States Sqdn’, on the badge this was abbreviated to ‘214 FMS Sqdn’. When I ordered my blazer badge, because I described it as 214 FMS Sqdn, the manufacturer assumed that I wanted the badge with a King’s crown. They seemed to think the ‘FMS’ was dropped by 1952, but during my time on the Sqdn, between 1959 and 65, ‘FMS’ was always on the badge.
Are the 'location' associations, such as ‘Guernsey’s Own’, permanent?
Of personal interest, 214 Sqdn, was ‘214 Federated Malaya States Sqdn’, on the badge this was abbreviated to ‘214 FMS Sqdn’. When I ordered my blazer badge, because I described it as 214 FMS Sqdn, the manufacturer assumed that I wanted the badge with a King’s crown. They seemed to think the ‘FMS’ was dropped by 1952, but during my time on the Sqdn, between 1959 and 65, ‘FMS’ was always on the badge.
Yes, Him
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"201 was affiliated with Guernsey in April 1939 as part of the Municipal Liaison Scheme" it sez here. Presumably selected with a pin by some Air Ministry blunty.
Interestingly (or not) 216Sqn was designated Bomber Transport Squadron.
Interestingly (or not) 216Sqn was designated Bomber Transport Squadron.
And I'd never noticed the GR in front of 206 Sqn either.
It's a bloody shame if people start wiping out a unit's history, though (even if the unit is 201).
It's a bloody shame if people start wiping out a unit's history, though (even if the unit is 201).
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Besides, it doesn't have the same ring as Falmouth's Feckers.
Air Ministry Orders in 1939 and then again in 1941 stopped the practice of including roles (e.g Flying Boat) in badges. In effect, there are two official badges - the current one, without a role included in the border and the old-style one.
Links with locations (74 [Trinidad]; 139 [Jamaica], etc, etc) were brought to an end in 1952.
There were several reasons for this - these included the fact that some squadrons had adopted these names for reasons which weren't entirely clear, and even the Air Ministry had been a bit too busy between 1939 and 1945 to see whether the link should be made official. Also, as it was appreciated that many squadron numberplates would disappear as the RAF reduced in size, there were concerns that disbanding a unit could cause problems, particularly if the unit had the name of a country in its title.
This didn't stop squadrons from continuing their links with other nations, though - when 139 disbanded, the Jamaican government demanded (as near as damn it) that the squadron be reformed instantly, since it was an insult to Jamaica. A polite 'don't tell us how to number our squadrons' missive was sent to the Jamaican govt, pointing out that no RAF squadrons had been known by their affiliation since 1952 (at least not officially, although they didn't say this), as the result of an AMO, and therefore, the FCO and their Airships regretted that 139 could not be granted special treatment - although there was a possibility (this was true) that it might appear as a Buccaneer squadron in due course.
By the by, II(AC) were at one point in breach of two AMOs - one which required all squadrons to use Arabic instead of Roman numerals, and another which said that a role, current or historic, shouldn't be stated in brackets after the number. II(AC) appear to have mislaid the instruction, and allowed the bureaucracy to come round to their way of thinking in due course...
Links with locations (74 [Trinidad]; 139 [Jamaica], etc, etc) were brought to an end in 1952.
There were several reasons for this - these included the fact that some squadrons had adopted these names for reasons which weren't entirely clear, and even the Air Ministry had been a bit too busy between 1939 and 1945 to see whether the link should be made official. Also, as it was appreciated that many squadron numberplates would disappear as the RAF reduced in size, there were concerns that disbanding a unit could cause problems, particularly if the unit had the name of a country in its title.
This didn't stop squadrons from continuing their links with other nations, though - when 139 disbanded, the Jamaican government demanded (as near as damn it) that the squadron be reformed instantly, since it was an insult to Jamaica. A polite 'don't tell us how to number our squadrons' missive was sent to the Jamaican govt, pointing out that no RAF squadrons had been known by their affiliation since 1952 (at least not officially, although they didn't say this), as the result of an AMO, and therefore, the FCO and their Airships regretted that 139 could not be granted special treatment - although there was a possibility (this was true) that it might appear as a Buccaneer squadron in due course.
By the by, II(AC) were at one point in breach of two AMOs - one which required all squadrons to use Arabic instead of Roman numerals, and another which said that a role, current or historic, shouldn't be stated in brackets after the number. II(AC) appear to have mislaid the instruction, and allowed the bureaucracy to come round to their way of thinking in due course...