Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Large Station Closure!!!???

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Large Station Closure!!!???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Nov 2001, 16:44
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Far far away
Age: 53
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Are we looking to save money?

Then CLOSE MPA!
D-IFF_ident is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2001, 17:44
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 608
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

P'rhaps their Airships don't know, but lots of large aircraft plus lots of needed support staff equals large expensive base.

So lets add to the expense by closing it down, moving it elsewhere and making the new base as large and expensive as the one we just left.

Makes sense to me!

Doc C
Doctor Cruces is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2001, 22:36
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Spanish Riviera
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

How about closing bases beginning with Al?

Think about how much money/morale we would save.
Whipping Boy's SATCO is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2001, 20:20
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I imagine Gordon Brown has done some quick sums on the price of land (with planning consent) in Oxford and Wilts and compared it with (eg) Lincoln, where there seem to be at least two under-utilised airfields where many large aircraft used to be based. He thinks he can make a killing by flogging off BZN and LYE.
Personally I think it obscene that any more large scale residential developments can be contemplated in Southern England, where the crowding and crumbling infrastructure are a disgrace. I believe that military airfields, which are less intensively utilised then their civvy counterparts, are less damaging to the rural environment than residential devlopments, and I have written to warn the Campaign for the Preservation of Rural England (CPRE), of which I am a member.
When I was in Plans at Strike (ha! ha!) we used to defend St Mawgan (and Manston and Lossie) by insisting on having a MDA at the extremities of the Island, on the basis that however badly Met screwed up, they could not conjure up a weather system that put these three airfields out at the same time.
Flatus Veteranus is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2001, 23:39
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,967
Received 68 Likes on 26 Posts
Cool

OK so why close Lyneham ? Never was much good a Perf A but as I remember Lye is built
on a hill with a big drop at one end and
a main road and housing at the other. The
main runway is short by modern standards and
has no room to be significantly lengthened.
When the A400M arrives, would it have the
max-mass performance to compensate for the
runway length at Lye ? Better surely to put
it into Bzn with a much longer not to mention wider runway; while we are at it why
not pop the J's in there as well - keep all
the AT assets together with a tad of tanking
thrown in.

James Gray MP quite naturally is looking for
headlines in respect of job closures at Lye.
I would suggest however that it is more than
likely that the Army would move in thus MOD
be able to dispose of Hullavington and South
Cerney for commercial/residential development. The airfield facilities at Lye
would be kept intact a la Honnington and Wattisham - nice and handy for exercises on
the Plain.

One thing is for certain - any sign of major
rebuilding is certain to guarantee closure
as my stints at Fenton and Chivenor in days
gone by proved quite clearly.
beamer is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2001, 01:27
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: A PC!
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Surely st Mawgan should be the one to go? What it is ACTUALLY used for that could not be done from BZN or LYE?

You could build a real holiday camp on it and that would put more money into the local economy than the current, MoD holiday camp does!

it is only about 15min closer to the Atlantic than LYE and a damn sight closer than KSS.
If you add up the figures, shutting LYE or BZN doesn't tally - 50 or so Hercs/A400M. Half a dozen C17, 15 or so tankers and you could put the Nimrods in there, too, if wanted.

So, pull out of Cornwall (or better still, pull out of Wales and give the Hawks that lovely big runway to play with - easy formation landings!).
moggie is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2001, 03:01
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 15,032
Received 212 Likes on 78 Posts
Post

Yes but Moggie there is something rather big, rather complex and rather American underneath RAF St Mawgan that rather precludes it from becoming a Butlins. Good move for the poor souls stuck up in Ice Station Kilo though...

WWW
Wee Weasley Welshman is online now  
Old 28th Nov 2001, 03:08
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,850
Received 328 Likes on 115 Posts
Post

Close bases that either begin with 'al' - or have 'al' in their name. Like, err, Vall*y?

Oops - perhaps not. Sorry, Coltishall!
BEagle is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2001, 10:11
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: A 1/2 World away from Ice Statio Kilo
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Vasco dead on the money!

Close bzn give it to branson or whoever

Move the kipper back to their favourite home
and move the tankas n trukas to ice station kilo.
They have had to nice for too long
Charlie Luncher is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2001, 14:38
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Kalgoorlie, W.A. , Australia
Age: 86
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Read Desert Crash's post Disposal of Lyneham
Only profit for MoD at Brize

Wish I could get the add url thingey right 1st time!

[ 30 November 2001: Message edited by: Pom Pax ]
Pom Pax is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.