Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Apache/Tornado navs

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Apache/Tornado navs

Old 8th Oct 2001, 02:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Apache/Tornado navs

Has anyone else heard the rumour that spare Tornado navs are going to re-tread as front seat apache mates? Seems like a pretty good idea, atleast until the AAC are up to speed with the EW game etc.
fone_effect is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2001, 03:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: BZN
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Pi22 off
ol_benkenobi is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2001, 04:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Hampshire, England
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Thats a Rumour that goes back many years.
It started in the early 90's when apaches were due in service by 97.
blind pue is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2001, 15:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the cold, wet, but now well remunerated North Sea!
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Let's take a reality check here! No matter how good a Tornado Nav might be at the old EW stuff the front seater on an Apache is a PILOT and a HELICOPTER PILOT to boot! No matter how many spare Tornado Navs are loafing about in crewrooms there are not enough to weather the attrition rate that would be required to put more than a couple of them into the front - PILOTS - seat of an attack helicopter. Now, Harrier pilots - thats another story!
mkeane is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2001, 20:04
  #5 (permalink)  
ENG
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I think its a grate idea. Maybe they'd get demoted to LCpl as well.
ENG is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2001, 21:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Death Star
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Eng, you mean promoted?
Helmut Visorcover is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2001, 20:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK (Wilts)
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I hope your bull cwp is flashing, tqnct4cwp. The pilot is very definitely the back seater in the WAH64, the "gunner" rides up front. Perhaps as he sees more he could navigate as well (nav for short?).

Be under no illusion the pilot's job is to drive the weapon carrier to the release point (that goes globally), he doesn't necessarily have to be the aimer or have tactical command.

PS Before you start I am a pilot, only I'm a realistic one.

[ 09 October 2001: Message edited by: Grey Area ]
Grey Area is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2001, 11:09
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: A Hole
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I know of an ex Tornado Nav who looked at this cross-over. He has just finished Shawbury......
Tilt&Gain is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2001, 14:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

As I understand it, the guy in the front works the weapons systems etc, and the back-seater flies. However, both people are trained to do both jobs, i.e. the WSO/NAV also needs to be a qualified pilot, incase of incapaciation (err....death) of the other party, and the need to continue of the mission.

SJ
Sugar_Junkie is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2001, 16:37
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the cold, wet, but now well remunerated North Sea!
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Grey Area

If the guy in the front seat is not a pilot, what does he do if the rear seater catches a headfull of 23mm? I supose he puts his very smart all singing all dancing helmet between his legs and kisses his @rse goodbye!!
mkeane is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2001, 22:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

hey....... why dont we makr the DIF (dude in front) a bloke who map reads, delivers ordnance and relies on the more experiened DIB (you work it out) to get him to said ordnance release point. We could also give DIF some basic flying hands on to enable him to land in the event of DIF getting a 23mm in the skull, his flying would no doubt improve through osmosis in the unit to quite a high level but initially a nice run on would suffice.. aah but what would we call such a beast?? Anyone for re inventing this round thing we land on???


[ 11 October 2001: Message edited by: Lou Coutturn ]
lou couturn is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2001, 22:18
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: All over the place
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

If anybody knows the whereabouts of all these spare Navs I'm sure the Innsworth would like to know. As far as the front line is concerned, Navs are in very short supply. Before you can have somebody to retrain you need a body in the first place!!
Fox-1 is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2001, 23:11
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Lou - Would have been a JAFA in a previous life?
fone_effect is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2001, 23:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,833
Received 72 Likes on 28 Posts
Cool

I remember a briefing on the percieved roles of the front and rear seaters back around 89/90. When I suggested that perhaps we would be returning to the Pilot/Air Gunner concept (CREST having been in a year or so), it was hinted that comments like that would not do my career any good!!

MightyGem is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2001, 12:09
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Fohn.. no I am afraid I went straight to the AWACS position as a lofty Cpl. Thing was we didnt even get a C/S

[ 14 October 2001: Message edited by: Lou Coutturn ]
lou couturn is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2001, 15:08
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Well knowing the forces as it is present.. they've probably thought about the idea.. Like that crazy one about putting guns on the eurofighter. Well we have to give em some chance don't we?! I would have thought it would have taken too much money to do such a scheme. But its upto the MOD in the end. its our money they're wasting.
Felixmini is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2001, 16:32
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: down sarrf
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It always makes me laugh when this old chesnut comes out, why should the AAC pay crab officers dosh large to do a job we all know that Lcpls can do without too much effort, all you'd get is whining Baggage claiming they are too clever to be Nvs and should be Pilots, just like they do anyway but it will be made 10x worse when the Driver is an NCO, the A*SE Force really do think you need a commission to fly!, Leave the crabs in NRSA land and leave the real Airmen to do the job, just like in 1914
neilk is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2001, 04:46
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Woof, Woof
Flashman is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2001, 10:35
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Offshore somewhere ...
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Personally, as an ex gunship driver who has recently spent a few months with navs ....

the job is ideal for a nav .......

trouble is the AAC are too narrow minded to see it ...

ka kite a no eho
Chinook is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2001, 15:58
  #20 (permalink)  

Just beating the air into submission!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Flyingrockdj (or should I say Neil), you should know better than the tripe you have been spouting above. RAF fast jet navs are weapons system operators and navs. Most of them that I have flown with can fly helos to a standard better than that of the average AAC pilot. Having thrown this can of gas on the fire.......I have been a QHI in the AAC for 12 years and in the RAF for almost 3 years...I feel qualified to make this statement. I seems to me the only whining and whinging going on is from the JNCO/SNCO elements of the Corps.

Chinook, say Hi to Bill Jarvis and remind him that he owes me some metal wings!!

Badger

I don't know, but Ive been told, "Air Force Wings are make of Gold"
HeliAviator is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.