RAF Chinook airframe destroyed - Helmand Province
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: east of england
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I remember the Chinook being classed Medium Lift too and then it all changed towards the beginning of the millenium. This is taken from Aviation Week:
In a 2004 report, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) broke down the weight for medium-lift helicopters as those weighing 12,000 - 45,000 pounds, and classified heavy-lift helicopters as those that weigh more. CRS specifically cites the Chinook as a heavy-lift helicopter. Boeing reports early model Chinooks weighing nearly 25,000 pounds empty and 50,000 pounds at maximum gross weight – the highest in the Army inventory.
In a 2004 report, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) broke down the weight for medium-lift helicopters as those weighing 12,000 - 45,000 pounds, and classified heavy-lift helicopters as those that weigh more. CRS specifically cites the Chinook as a heavy-lift helicopter. Boeing reports early model Chinooks weighing nearly 25,000 pounds empty and 50,000 pounds at maximum gross weight – the highest in the Army inventory.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LONDON
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Typical jurno inaccuracy -
Did anyone else spot that the Chinooks in the Daily Telegraph picture were American and not British as stated? How do their editors put up with such continually poor basic knowledge from their supposed mil expert correspondants!
Rant over!
Did anyone else spot that the Chinooks in the Daily Telegraph picture were American and not British as stated? How do their editors put up with such continually poor basic knowledge from their supposed mil expert correspondants!
Rant over!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: One Three Seven, Disco Heaven.
Age: 65
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes
on
17 Posts
It's been a while, but when I was stood under the things hooking, the following were classed as Medium Support Helicopter:
Wessex - Presumably supplanted by Merlin 3
SK(4)
Puma
Chinook
Only the CH-53 was classed as Heavy.
I can recall a poster on the crew room wall at Lossie circa 84/85 informing us that the heavies were coming. It featured images of Sea Kings and Chinooks.
Wessex - Presumably supplanted by Merlin 3
SK(4)
Puma
Chinook
Only the CH-53 was classed as Heavy.
I can recall a poster on the crew room wall at Lossie circa 84/85 informing us that the heavies were coming. It featured images of Sea Kings and Chinooks.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got home tonight, to be told by my son that a Chinook had been shot down. I am ultra relieved that the crew are OK (well as far as I have heard anyway). If this was enemy fire of any kind, then PLEASE PLEASE can someone in MOD, or some very senior officer(s) press our excuse for a government for not only a replacement of this airframe (and ideally more), but also more Apaches (and spares) so that in future enemy fire can either be prevented, or returned very quickly and accurately!
Sorry if that was a rant (plus teaching almost all of us to suck eggs), but I do despair at the attitude shown to UK forces (by our elected leaders, and not by our general public (me included) or by our U.S. partners).
Once again, glad it ended as well as it could.
Sorry if that was a rant (plus teaching almost all of us to suck eggs), but I do despair at the attitude shown to UK forces (by our elected leaders, and not by our general public (me included) or by our U.S. partners).
Once again, glad it ended as well as it could.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: England
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did anyone else spot that the Chinooks in the Daily Telegraph picture were American and not British as stated? How do their editors put up with such continually poor basic knowledge from their supposed mil expert correspondants!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,031
Received 2,902 Likes
on
1,243 Posts
Typical jurno inaccuracy -
Did anyone else spot that the Chinooks in the Daily Telegraph picture were American and not British as stated? How do their editors put up with such continually poor basic knowledge from their supposed mil expert correspondants!
Rant over!
Did anyone else spot that the Chinooks in the Daily Telegraph picture were American and not British as stated? How do their editors put up with such continually poor basic knowledge from their supposed mil expert correspondants!
Rant over!
Just a shame no one turned up to see him off and give him the good news, " we have managed to piece back together your lost Luggage from Lockerbie and have popped it in the rear hold for you....... Have a good flight!"
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Caution: microphones, media moments and senior officers.
I don't say this with any sense of schadenfreude, but 3 days ago, I listened to an interview with OC JAG. He was saying that Chinooks were ok because they were so rugged and I thought then, that it was a Kevin Keegan (".. with only 2 minutes to play, of course we're safe") moment. I turned to my companion and said 'Great, thats done it, they're going to be loving him.'. I hope he gets pinned down in the Chinook crewroom, his eyebrows shaved off, a Regimental bath severely administered and the beers in - eventually of course!!
Well done to the crew for getting it down, you have my upmost respect and admiration for what you and the aeromed teams are doing. There was also a piece with a Sgt nurse medic who conveyed superbly what the job is all about - gritting your teeth, getting your head down, banging out the workload.. and in such a professional manner. If anything has put the teamwork element of things firmly into perspective and just how vital and punchy the more 'mundane' side of RAF flying ops really is, its what you lot are doing. I wonder if the numbers who choose helicopter flying through choice are increasing as a result.
FF>> 18'30" mark.
BBC iPlayer - 5 live Drive: 18/08/2009
Well done to the crew for getting it down, you have my upmost respect and admiration for what you and the aeromed teams are doing. There was also a piece with a Sgt nurse medic who conveyed superbly what the job is all about - gritting your teeth, getting your head down, banging out the workload.. and in such a professional manner. If anything has put the teamwork element of things firmly into perspective and just how vital and punchy the more 'mundane' side of RAF flying ops really is, its what you lot are doing. I wonder if the numbers who choose helicopter flying through choice are increasing as a result.
FF>> 18'30" mark.
BBC iPlayer - 5 live Drive: 18/08/2009
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nigit
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Al R
A Chinook driving friend of mine spent a couple of days visiting IOT recently - not to brief them, just to look at the setup. None of them knew him or his background (he deliberately didn't tell them) but despite this he said that amongst those in the pilot branch, aspirations were pretty much 50% Typhoon and 50% Chinook.
I wonder if the numbers who choose helicopter flying through choice are increasing as a result.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The chap who mentioned " this airframe will never be replaced under Labour ( government ) is living in a dream; it wouldn't be replaced under the tories either, despite what they may comfortably say right now.
Remember Thatcher trying to sell off HMS Invincible before the Falklands War - for that is what it was, not a ' conflict ', but she made the most of it when we won, which wouldn't have happened if she had her earlier way - and she refused the P1216 supersonic STOVL project, which was way ahead of its' time, made the F-35B look like a JCB.
Now we have to rely on the Americans for employment on parts, and their joining us if a real shooting war breaks out - 6 Type 45 Daring class anti-air destroyers - how brainless is that ?!
Thanks to UK politicians of all flavours, we lack the decent kit 'our' people need while actually at war - comfy chairs & plasma screens in Whitehall, crap equipment for the guys on the front line; if they're so confident the kit is up to the job, why don't they swap places for a few days ?
Remember Thatcher trying to sell off HMS Invincible before the Falklands War - for that is what it was, not a ' conflict ', but she made the most of it when we won, which wouldn't have happened if she had her earlier way - and she refused the P1216 supersonic STOVL project, which was way ahead of its' time, made the F-35B look like a JCB.
Now we have to rely on the Americans for employment on parts, and their joining us if a real shooting war breaks out - 6 Type 45 Daring class anti-air destroyers - how brainless is that ?!
Thanks to UK politicians of all flavours, we lack the decent kit 'our' people need while actually at war - comfy chairs & plasma screens in Whitehall, crap equipment for the guys on the front line; if they're so confident the kit is up to the job, why don't they swap places for a few days ?
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: nr KDAA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spotter alert
Did anyone else spot that the Chinooks in the Daily Telegraph picture were American and not British as stated? How do their editors put up with such continually poor basic knowledge from their supposed mil expert correspondants!
Actually Vox and Spindrier, the Chinooks in question were a CH-47F from the US and an Australian CH-47D. Cheers easy
Actually Vox and Spindrier, the Chinooks in question were a CH-47F from the US and an Australian CH-47D. Cheers easy
Well said Double Zero!
Remember the axe that swung in the early '90's, "Options for change"? That was a Tory brainwave, and that's what did for my RAF career. Politicians of all colours feed from the same trough......... self indulgence.
Remember the axe that swung in the early '90's, "Options for change"? That was a Tory brainwave, and that's what did for my RAF career. Politicians of all colours feed from the same trough......... self indulgence.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bridgwater Somerset
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am surprised there is very little discussion on this thread. If the Chinook came down due to an engine fire was this a fuel leak or a technical problem that could happen again? Well we won't know because it was destroyed.
Or if bought down by enemy fire this is a new tactic and with more helicopters going into to theatre has the potential to have a devestating effect had this have happened with 40 fully-laden troops on board.
But of course the Chinook was destroyed so we may never know if it was enemy fire and if so what was used to bring it down. And it was noticable that there was very little media coverage of this event, what ever the reason it came down.
Or if bought down by enemy fire this is a new tactic and with more helicopters going into to theatre has the potential to have a devestating effect had this have happened with 40 fully-laden troops on board.
But of course the Chinook was destroyed so we may never know if it was enemy fire and if so what was used to bring it down. And it was noticable that there was very little media coverage of this event, what ever the reason it came down.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TD,
Nope, we won't know because its a war zone of course. I watched the Battle of Britain on More4 last night ("Don't you shout at me Mister Warwick!!") and I didn't see servicemen's lives being risked to recover Spitfires and Hurricances from The Channel.
With the very greatest of respect, I'm not sure that shooting down aeroplanes belonging to the other side can be described as 'a new tactic'.
Nope, we won't know because its a war zone of course. I watched the Battle of Britain on More4 last night ("Don't you shout at me Mister Warwick!!") and I didn't see servicemen's lives being risked to recover Spitfires and Hurricances from The Channel.
With the very greatest of respect, I'm not sure that shooting down aeroplanes belonging to the other side can be described as 'a new tactic'.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: planet earth
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
technical problem that could happen again?
And I also reckon that the crew telling everybody that they were shot down might be a bit of a giveaway too...
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: I wish someone would tell me
Age: 47
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TD, without claiming to understand your situation, we must all be wary of looking for complex airworthiness issues in ever incident that occurs. Aircraft of all types are complex beasts, and incidents do occur, never mind enemy action. The difference between a single incident, and a significant trend is important, but we be careful not to react hastily.
The reason the coverage has been light might be something due to the media blackout during the election, and that fact that thankfully it was only the aircraft that was lost. I am sure the guys and girls both in theatre and back here will be analysing the incident in detail, working out responses. That is something we definately don't want to see in open forums!
El Colonel!
The reason the coverage has been light might be something due to the media blackout during the election, and that fact that thankfully it was only the aircraft that was lost. I am sure the guys and girls both in theatre and back here will be analysing the incident in detail, working out responses. That is something we definately don't want to see in open forums!
El Colonel!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If we're really lucky, this airframe will be part of the £6.5 billion the auditors couldn't find.
Well done all involved, glad everyone's safe - mind you, getting the hell out of there as fast as possible is a bit of a no-brainer - it's not like you've got many other choices is it?
What a good result from a ****ty position . . .
Well done all involved, glad everyone's safe - mind you, getting the hell out of there as fast as possible is a bit of a no-brainer - it's not like you've got many other choices is it?
What a good result from a ****ty position . . .
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If shot down, this Chinook would hardly be the first; one full of U.S. Special Forces guys, on a mission to recover the survivor of an ambushed S.F. team, took an RPG straight into the open tail door, killing all on board.
The sole survivor of the team they went out to rescue was picked up by National Guard reservists in a very hairy operation, repeated by another flight by them the next day to bring his comrades' bodies back, again in a very hostile situation.
As in the plain daft thinking behind the Tornado & JP233, no-one yet seems to have come up with a defence against simple artillery - " Shields up, Spock ! "
The sole survivor of the team they went out to rescue was picked up by National Guard reservists in a very hairy operation, repeated by another flight by them the next day to bring his comrades' bodies back, again in a very hostile situation.
As in the plain daft thinking behind the Tornado & JP233, no-one yet seems to have come up with a defence against simple artillery - " Shields up, Spock ! "
You lot spot the faults, inaccuracies, lies, mistakes general shoddiness in the newspaper reports about the military. But this lax standard of reporting goes across the board. And people actually believe what they read. This is not good.