Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

The advantages of engine configurations...

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

The advantages of engine configurations...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Aug 2009, 00:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The advantages of engine configurations...

Another one for the grownups here!

Everyone knows that the Lightning was one hellva fast mover, but my question is this...

Did it gain any specific advantage from having its engines mounted one on top of the other, as opposed to side my side like every other twin engined aircraft i've ever seen?

What would the specific advantages/disadvantages of the different engine layouts?


Thanks in advance.
Yeoman_dai is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 01:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 250 ft agl
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stacking the engines vertically (staggering them to avoid too much weight aft, with the lower engine forward of the upper) helped to minimise drag, effectively tucking them behind the cockpit, fed from air through the nose, achieved minimum frontal area. This effectively gave twice the thrust of its contemporaries for an increase in frontal area of only 50%.

SMT
stickmonkeytamer is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 04:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Muscat, Oman
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No Assymetric yaw problems, but did once have an exciting take off when the top burner did not light. Eventually slammed the stick forward and back to bounce the nose wheel off the ground as all 3 wheels were still firmly planted at 170 kts.

The top engine was further back so that the pilot had somewhere to sit was what I was told!!

After one Lightning skimmed the rooftops of Grimsby before ejecting due to a stuck elevator (and the almost landing of the DC-10 at Sioux City), we used to attempt recoveries using rudder and differential throttle to control the pitch. Nobody had to do it for real, but I was at Binbrook when a Jet Provost landed using the trim tab for pitch control as his elevators had jammed.
Ali Barber is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 06:29
  #4 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It might also have had some benefit of area-rule.

The Buccaneer and F106 both had waisted fuselages to compensate for the inncreased frontal area of the wings. By mounting the engines vertically and later adding a ventral tank, a similar gradual increase in cross section could be obtained but retaining the thin wing for supersonic flight.

Just a thought.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 07:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wherever my hat is.
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Biggest disadvantage as I understand it was fire. If the bottom engine burned, it set fire to the top one, if the top engine burned, molten metal would find its way to the bottome one.

Sub opitmal, I would suggest. However, I'd fly one if I could!!!

NMRL
Notmyreallogin is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 11:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South Central UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regardless of orientation, engines mounted in close proximity are always at risk of sustaining collateral damage should an adjacent engine fail catastrophically. There being numerous examples over the years. Hence, engine design seeks to contain failures - but not easy when heavy, rapidly rotating lumps of engine decide to go walkabout..

If I recall correctly, John Ward did recover a Lightning back to Akrotiri during 56 Sqn's tenure with limited, if not total, lack of conventional longitudinal control and was awarded an AFC to boot.

lm
lightningmate is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 11:25
  #7 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by lightningmate
If I recall correctly, John Ward did recover a Lightning back to Akrotiri during 56 Sqn's tenure with limited, if not total, lack of conventional longitudinal control and was awarded an AFC to boot.

lm
I'll ask him when I see him.

There was one period, around 1972, that 56 dumped one aircraft per month in the bay. Then, when they were in UK for an MPC, the relief sqn doing an APC dumped one of their jets there too. Fortunately none of the crashes resulted in any fatalities or injuries.

The ditchings may have been premediated as Akrotiri had only one runway which was clearly of more strategic importance than a Lightning.

At the time the magazine scribe for IX Sqn made an injudicious comment in the station mag until someone whispered in his ear that the next one might be fatal. IIRC there were no fatalities. The scribe retired as an AVM but is still closely involved in scribbing. [The dangers of teaching pilots how to write.]

PS, lost a school chum on 74 trying to get the crippled jet back to Tengah and avoid spearing into a kampong.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 12:01
  #8 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was one period, around 1972, that 56 dumped one aircraft per month in the bay.
They were trying to build a causeway to Beirut, (it was nice then).
Actually, I only recall two or three doing a spurlash test.
Gainesy is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 13:31
  #9 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,445
Received 1,602 Likes on 734 Posts
Area rule, room for the pilot, drag....

All right, I give up, which one applied to the Short Sperrin.....

ORAC is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 16:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ORAC, actually I think that looks rather nice. It also appears to have 2 different engines.
Wader2 is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 16:25
  #11 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,445
Received 1,602 Likes on 734 Posts
That's a later Mod to fit the Gyron for trials, the original had 2 avons, same as the Lightning. Short Sperrin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - Wikipedia

This is a shot with the original engines, a bit more slab sided...

ORAC is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 17:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,821
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
It looks as thought the designer forgot he wasn't still designing flying boats until he'd done the nose....

Actually, I think it looks plug ugly!
BEagle is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 18:13
  #13 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Looks like they used the tail from Vickers and the wings from de Haviland but used a spare Sunderland rig.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 19:45
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 2,076
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Yep!
A nasty accident - rear end smash - of a Valetta into a Nimrod, ending up in a broken sunderland.
Who was it that said "if it looked right...."
Rigga is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 17:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One disadvantage of the Lightning was that the engine config left little room for fuel. So they crammed it in where they could, including inside the flaps (!). This meant that there were many incidents involving fuel leaks, and a high maintainence load to try to limit them.
Chancros is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 18:49
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,340
Received 62 Likes on 45 Posts
Did i read somewhere that if the firebottle on the Lightning needed changing, the engine had to come out?

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 21:00
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 2,076
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Must've been similar to Hunters then - Tail off and engine out at the drop of a hat...
And the Harrier - Wings off at the drop of a pin (or nut, or bolt...)
Rigga is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.