The Defense Budget - What would you do?
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Waiting to return to the Loire.
Age: 54
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scary option - seems decidedly 'purple' & Defence Force based
but...
...the major savings from personnel (other than cuts in numbers or pay cuts) can only come from homogenising the 3 Services into one and then have core military basic training being completed at 1 major location rather than the 4 (or is that 6 with RAF additionality) currently used - and then have trade training also include branch of service training.
The same could be done with Officer training.
'Royal' has had it right in having Lympstone for the last 30+ years training all ranks in one location (and Deal before that IIRC). Particularly forward looking IMO.
Don't get me wrong - it is an absolute disgrace that the economic state and the wilful incompetence and neglect of the 'political class' has brought this to a head.
Politicians should have previous experience outside of politics before thay are ever allowed to stand for election - and I don't mean working for a party, being a researcher, or some token Civil Serpent job to fluff out their CVs.
but...
...the major savings from personnel (other than cuts in numbers or pay cuts) can only come from homogenising the 3 Services into one and then have core military basic training being completed at 1 major location rather than the 4 (or is that 6 with RAF additionality) currently used - and then have trade training also include branch of service training.
The same could be done with Officer training.
'Royal' has had it right in having Lympstone for the last 30+ years training all ranks in one location (and Deal before that IIRC). Particularly forward looking IMO.
Don't get me wrong - it is an absolute disgrace that the economic state and the wilful incompetence and neglect of the 'political class' has brought this to a head.
Politicians should have previous experience outside of politics before thay are ever allowed to stand for election - and I don't mean working for a party, being a researcher, or some token Civil Serpent job to fluff out their CVs.
The Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Philip Hammond, was on the Radio last night and stated that:
a. There would have to be cut backs in all public sector spending
b. The UK military in Afghanistan should get the additional equipment they needed to carry out the war
c. a & b mean that there would be other sectors of the defence budget that would have to be cut to pay for the Afghanistan campaign and the "defence share" of the overall public sector pain & grief.
OK, so what non Afghanistan related areas of the Defence Budget do we think will be cut?
a. There would have to be cut backs in all public sector spending
b. The UK military in Afghanistan should get the additional equipment they needed to carry out the war
c. a & b mean that there would be other sectors of the defence budget that would have to be cut to pay for the Afghanistan campaign and the "defence share" of the overall public sector pain & grief.
OK, so what non Afghanistan related areas of the Defence Budget do we think will be cut?
Oh my god...please let it stop
Andyy I apologise for my earlier rudeness but for crying out loud, just look at your original post and all those since, that is the context of my comments. Utter un-informed drivel. Lots of armchair staffies giving us all the benefit of their experience and wisdom. I thought Jackonory was bad enough but at least his arguments, are backed up with some form of research and logic!
I know that this is a "public" forum and people can post pretty much what they like but, please, have a word with yourselves!
Andyy I apologise for my earlier rudeness but for crying out loud, just look at your original post and all those since, that is the context of my comments. Utter un-informed drivel. Lots of armchair staffies giving us all the benefit of their experience and wisdom. I thought Jackonory was bad enough but at least his arguments, are backed up with some form of research and logic!I know that this is a "public" forum and people can post pretty much what they like but, please, have a word with yourselves!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some savings. Why not put RAF regt training to the infantry training centre at catterick? With an airfield defence wing for their specialised training.
The argument to replace Nimrod with P8 would cost more money than fielding Nimrod.
Does Tac transport wing need to be RAF or could the RLC not provide it with suitable training?
The argument to replace Nimrod with P8 would cost more money than fielding Nimrod.
Does Tac transport wing need to be RAF or could the RLC not provide it with suitable training?
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lowlevel UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Self Assessment
HQAC, or whatever, has produced a little handbook called
This is a second edition. The first docket was produced by the Air Ministry in 1947. Chapter 1 - Military Commander, asks:
Para 2 and 2c are gems:
As a Colonel, Erwin Rommel considered that
Seems that might be true today. Do the RN and the Army offer similar advice?
Am I a Good Engineer Officer: A Guide for Self-Assessment at Frequent Intervals.
Do I appreciate that my job essentially is to deliver hard military output?
2. The spirit and intention of all engineering rules and regulations is to support the delivery of military output, not to create or maintain a technicians' 'empire'. To achieve this, the Engineer Officer must: ...
2c. Generate that capability with the greatest possible economy in resource, whilst understanding the operational imperative has precedence. Cheap effect that cannot meet its military task is no effect at all.
2c. Generate that capability with the greatest possible economy in resource, whilst understanding the operational imperative has precedence. Cheap effect that cannot meet its military task is no effect at all.
The British write some of the best doctrine in the world. It is fortunate that their officers do not read it!
Looks like even the USAF is now looking for similar cost efficiencies - seems the F-22 may be a bit of a white elephant for the current War too (a la Typhoon)
New Low Cost Fighter Aircraft for USAF: Armed Forces News
New Low Cost Fighter Aircraft for USAF: Armed Forces News
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not qualified or in posession of enough facts to make any kind of informed decision about this... and unless we have a few current serving Brigadiers/Commodores knocking about nobody else is, really....
However, I noticed above someone suggesting moving IOT to Raleigh? Frankly, that is a ridiculous idea, and is completely wrong. All initial officer training is not like initial recruit training, for any service simply because YO's need a bigger knowledge base. What ratings need to include strategic studies and defense writing in their militarisation phases? hmm? Do they need to get their European Driving License? Know Rule of the Road?
Same goes for any of the services, it just isn't possible or right.
Therefore, you need to differentiate between them, and Britannia has a history going back hundreds of years, and in the general scheme of things costs penuts to run. Looking in the wrong direction entirely old chap.
(Why all three services couldn't amalgamate the selection procedure - (AOSB/AIB/OASC) I don't know.
However, I noticed above someone suggesting moving IOT to Raleigh? Frankly, that is a ridiculous idea, and is completely wrong. All initial officer training is not like initial recruit training, for any service simply because YO's need a bigger knowledge base. What ratings need to include strategic studies and defense writing in their militarisation phases? hmm? Do they need to get their European Driving License? Know Rule of the Road?
Same goes for any of the services, it just isn't possible or right.
Therefore, you need to differentiate between them, and Britannia has a history going back hundreds of years, and in the general scheme of things costs penuts to run. Looking in the wrong direction entirely old chap.
(Why all three services couldn't amalgamate the selection procedure - (AOSB/AIB/OASC) I don't know.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: london
Age: 48
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think we need more Fast jets, Trident, comfy chairs in MOD, massive Civil Servant pensions and compensation schemes for when they strain an ear.
Now to get this I think we should cut back on the Copter budget, stop these "unfair" payouts to young men who are wounded in Afghan!! Cut back on Defense Housing. Now come on who is with me?
I know a couple of "men" who think this is a great idea - Big Bad Bob A!! and Party leader brown.......
NB - This is a joke and would never happen....
Now to get this I think we should cut back on the Copter budget, stop these "unfair" payouts to young men who are wounded in Afghan!! Cut back on Defense Housing. Now come on who is with me?
I know a couple of "men" who think this is a great idea - Big Bad Bob A!! and Party leader brown.......
NB - This is a joke and would never happen....
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'would never happen...'
HA! We hope...
NB: UK PLC is quite capable of funding a large Army (150 000) Navy (at least 50 warships FFS) and Airforce (significant whizzy stuff, big stuff and whirly stuff), we should not even be asking this question - what we SHOULD be asking is how we can fight the trend and get funding back up to what it should be at - IMHO, somewhere around the 1960's spend.
People say we're broke, theres no more money, well no, there isn't, but that is a symptom of where we are putting the money we have (and in all fairness compared to most of the rest of the world, we have an awful lot)
HA! We hope...
NB: UK PLC is quite capable of funding a large Army (150 000) Navy (at least 50 warships FFS) and Airforce (significant whizzy stuff, big stuff and whirly stuff), we should not even be asking this question - what we SHOULD be asking is how we can fight the trend and get funding back up to what it should be at - IMHO, somewhere around the 1960's spend.
People say we're broke, theres no more money, well no, there isn't, but that is a symptom of where we are putting the money we have (and in all fairness compared to most of the rest of the world, we have an awful lot)
Registered User **
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Poephol
Age: 39
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Britannia has a history going back hundreds of years, and in the general scheme of things costs penuts to run
IMHO, somewhere around the 1960's spend
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
About as much as it takes to run a T42 for a year, if you must know.
Ok, you got me, I wasn't specific. I apologise.
What I SHOULD have said, was around the level of % of GDP, that it was in the 1960's - so around 6% as opposed to 2.5% currently.
There you go.
Ok, you got me, I wasn't specific. I apologise.
What I SHOULD have said, was around the level of % of GDP, that it was in the 1960's - so around 6% as opposed to 2.5% currently.
There you go.
Registered User **
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Poephol
Age: 39
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
About as much as it takes to run a T42 for a year, if you must know.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Contractors & quality of service
As interested observer I have seen outside contractors who fail to deliver value for money and seem to get away with this because the "military" staff seem to think that they have no control over these contractors.
I would think that each military base should have a business manager who is under the direct control of the local military command, these managers must have real civlian business track record (ie NOT from the civil service).
The role of this manager would be to over see the day to day working of contractors and local services to the military.
Very few people in the military have a business background (why should they) and are usualy poor businessmen so get someone in who can look after the militarys interest and let the military get on with job it is trained to do.
I hate the idea of another "blunty" draining the budget but I feel that if contractors had a "real" business person overseeing them it would save money in the long run, the only problem would be what your political masters do with the money that was saved?
I would think that each military base should have a business manager who is under the direct control of the local military command, these managers must have real civlian business track record (ie NOT from the civil service).
The role of this manager would be to over see the day to day working of contractors and local services to the military.
Very few people in the military have a business background (why should they) and are usualy poor businessmen so get someone in who can look after the militarys interest and let the military get on with job it is trained to do.
I hate the idea of another "blunty" draining the budget but I feel that if contractors had a "real" business person overseeing them it would save money in the long run, the only problem would be what your political masters do with the money that was saved?
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah ha, mentioning the Healy report - you disagree that the UK can afford the cost, and that we really are broke? Well, I guess you have a fair point in the current situation, but that's your belief. I'd view that the most distressing aspect of the whole situation is that even in a period of sustained growth, the defense budget was still skimmed time after time.
Reference BRNC costs, well Andym has messaged me and we've had a bit of a discussion and I can see good reasons for moving it to Raleigh that I havn't been aware of - a Lympstone for the RN. I would still resist such a change but more because i'm a sucker for tradition and, as i've mentioned we can afford the extra £20 million a year - 1/3rd of a Typhoon, the same we give in aid to Ethiopia, the same the Welsh assembly spends to re-invigorate its south western coastal belt, and £8 million less than it takes to run Sandhurst. Not to mention how much more than £20m is wasted on defense procurement decisions. I'd argue still that if you want to find savings (not that we need to) then there are better ways to find it than moving BRNC's duties lock stock to Raleigh. The UK made $2.13 trillion last year. Within that I really believe that we can find the £20m to run a seperate Naval Academy.
Reference BRNC costs, well Andym has messaged me and we've had a bit of a discussion and I can see good reasons for moving it to Raleigh that I havn't been aware of - a Lympstone for the RN. I would still resist such a change but more because i'm a sucker for tradition and, as i've mentioned we can afford the extra £20 million a year - 1/3rd of a Typhoon, the same we give in aid to Ethiopia, the same the Welsh assembly spends to re-invigorate its south western coastal belt, and £8 million less than it takes to run Sandhurst. Not to mention how much more than £20m is wasted on defense procurement decisions. I'd argue still that if you want to find savings (not that we need to) then there are better ways to find it than moving BRNC's duties lock stock to Raleigh. The UK made $2.13 trillion last year. Within that I really believe that we can find the £20m to run a seperate Naval Academy.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
More thought-provoking stuff from The Economist (aka house journal of HM Treasury).
The politics of defence | The thinning red line | Economist.com
The politics of defence | The thinning red line | Economist.com
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting article. I wonder who came up with the idea of paying soldiers even less than planned - do they WANT to decrease retention rates, even in a recession?