Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAAF to retire Caribou

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAAF to retire Caribou

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Sep 2008, 13:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAAF to retire Caribou

Source; Australian Aviation

CARIBOU TO BE RETIRED IN 2009: "The RAAF will retire its fleet of 14 DHC-4 Caribou tactical transports next year following the discovery of fatigue cracking and corrosion on the fleet's airframes and various systems.

Although the RAAF planned to operate the fleet through until 2012, the decision to bring the retirement date forward comes after a Caribou suffered severe damage to its left wing and upper fuselage after was what was previously reported as a ‘hard landing' in Papua New Guinea last month. The cause of the damage has since been attributed to a structural failure caused by severe fatigue.

Although nothing has been officially announced, sources say the Caribou's transport capability in regions such as PNG and East Timor will be temporarily covered by Army King Airs until a permanent replacement can be provided through the delayed Air 8000 Phase 2 project. "







Last edited by wessex19; 1st Oct 2008 at 00:02.
wessex19 is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2008, 15:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahhhh... the venerable gravel truck. The only fixed wing aircraft in the world that could suffer a bird strike from the rear.

What will be the replacement a/c? C-27, or something politically correct from the Near North?

Or nothing?
Wiley is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2008, 16:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Replacement

Reckon the C27 is a good bet as it's marketed as having a lot of common systems to the C130J which is already operated by RAAF.
microlight AV8R is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2008, 17:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North of Watford (Gap)
Age: 58
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've never appreciated just how massive a vertical stabiliser these things have. Greater area than the whole side of the fuselage...
nacluv is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 00:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WOW...as I was looking thru this post, I recalled being in PNG (38detA) as the last Caribou transitted thru there on it's delivery flight to Sydney!!

Boy, that does make me feel a little older!! (or at least realize the fact!)

Cheers...FD...
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 02:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Empire
Age: 50
Posts: 249
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
It will be sad to see it leave. A very special aircraft that is so good it is almost a helicopter.

Can it really be 'replaced'? Safe flying to the crews for the remainder of it's time in service.
Doors Off is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 03:15
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 57
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We probably shouldn't hold our breath ....

"MIN 89/97 Tuesday, 1 July, 1997

THREE COMPANIES SHORT-LISTED FOR CARIBOU REPLACEMENT

The Minister for Defence, Mr McLachlan, announced today that three companies had been short-listed as potential suppliers for the Australian Defence Force's new Light Transport Aircraft."
Like This - Do That is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 05:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've never appreciated just how massive a vertical stabiliser these things have
Anyone who has sat at the holding point watching what happens to the 'bou's 'massive vertical stabiliser' with brakes set and METO power applied just before it starts a STOL takeoff comes away with great respect for the durability -and malleability - of aviation grade aluminium. With full power applied, the whole tail section of the 'bou takes on a mind of it own, twisting and turning every which way, a bit like a snake that's been pinned to the floor on a shovel blade. (And that's not as big an exaggeration as some might suspect - the amount of flexing and wobbling is little short of alarming!!)
Wiley is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 05:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GAFA - East
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jumping the gun a bit

Australian Aviation may be jumping the gun here. As I understand it, the Bou's early retirement is a suggestion that CAF is putting to Government - it is not a done deal.

I wouldn't be putting money on evidence of either corrosion or fatigue contributing to the failures reported on the Efogi Bou either. The difference between a landing and a crash at that strip is miniscule and a sure fire cure for hicups.
BentStick is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 07:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The parts from the Bou in Efogi havent even been analysed yet. Reason for the retirment is because of cost benefit of maintaining the fleet. Hundreds of man hours to get a frame or 2 online.

See the thread in D&G Gen Aviation
Gundog01 is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 07:22
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: somewhere hot
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard that 38 Sqn are going to aquire the Army's fleet of King Air's from the middle of next year.
Cat Fived is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 07:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have pics of the busted Caribou at Efogi, as of last week, but don't know how to post them. Can anyone explain?
Wozzadee is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 07:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: due south
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wozzadee: This will tell you.
http://www.pprune.org/aviation-histo...-tips-you.html
henry crun is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 11:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is it that the suggestion that 38 Sqn will acquire a brace of used King Airs as the Caribou replacement (and operate them for many years to come) sound very plausible to me?

If I was a betting man, that would be the option I'd be putting my money on - and I wish I could be half as certain of winning the lottery.
Wiley is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 23:31
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks Henry Crun.

Pics of the busted Caribou at Efogi. I have more if anyone is interested. let me know.

Wozzadee is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2008, 00:08
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Empire
Age: 50
Posts: 249
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Makes you wonder? If the incident caused a caribou to end up like that, even with those big oleo's and big tyres with a frame designed to conduct rough field landings what would it have done to a C27J or CN235?

Another testament to the old Caribou's strength.
Doors Off is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2008, 08:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: nocte volant
Posts: 1,114
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many happy memories..bye 'bou





Trojan1981 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2008, 09:45
  #18 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Would there be any milage doing a Basler on them?
 
Old 2nd Oct 2008, 15:56
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Age: 61
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
never seen one up close but i bet they sound wonderful, what radial is that ?, r2800 perhaps?
mr fish is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2008, 19:50
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The US Army/USAF DHC-4s had 2 Pratt and Whitney R-2000-7M2 Twin Wasp 14-cylinder, 1,450 hp (1,081 kW) each.

The RAAF Caribou also have R-2000s, of 1,450 HP, although which exact mark(s) seems unclear. The -7M seems, however, to have been standard from the factory.
GreenKnight121 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.