Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Ballsy or what?!!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Ballsy or what?!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 11:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weston Super Mare/UAE
Age: 60
Posts: 406
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ballsy or what?!!

Am confused (doesn't take much to do this). Was returning to Dubai last night when we heard an ASCOT callsign initiate a diversion to Abu Dhabi for technical reasons. When asked his endurance he stated that it was an hour and a quarter whereupon the controller advised him that he might have to hold prior to his approach and how long could he do this for? The answer promptly came back as 'an hour and a quarter'! Am I missing something? Have just spent 10000 hours on the understanding that endurance was time to donkeys quitting and was somewhat different to the time that you were prepared to hold for! Please enlighten me. Am operating to civvie rules so this might have a bearing on the matter.
captainsmiffy is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 11:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only a tea boy here but my understanding is that endurance is "till it all goes very quiet"

Suspect he was quoting time to minima's but fully expect a Sky God to give you the definitive
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 12:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Noooooo. Thats "total" endurance. Endurance is until you reach the MLA
spheroid is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 15:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NSW
Posts: 113
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was he overhead AUH at the time!!

2P
2port is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 18:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: England
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Endurance is exactly that.

It is how long until the engines stop due to lack of fuel.

That is an emergency situation. It's not an ATC or Flt planning consideration.

PAN, Mayday or diversion is justified.
Monty77 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 18:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Endurance is exactly that.

It is how long until the engines stop due to lack of fuel.
No it's not. Endurance is until you reach your MLA.
spheroid is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 20:17
  #7 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
This might be a difference in terminology, between Civilian and Military training.

During my 18 yrs endurance meant till the engines quit. Then it's a Martin Baker letdown if you're lucky.

I would certainly include some fuel for the part between the hold and the runway, though!
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 20:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: England
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reminds me of a story from the 70’s.

Middle Eastern student at BFTS Linton declares an emergency.
ATC enquires, “What is your endurance?”
Student replies, “Sun Life of Canada”
extpwron is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 20:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Bar to Bar
Posts: 796
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm with ShyTq, endurance is when you have to glide/autorotate/bang out or whatever because the background noise is no longer there. There is box for it on the flightplan with guidance in the yellow book.

SL
Sloppy Link is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 21:38
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hook, Hants
Age: 68
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure someone RN will put me straight, but I believe they calculate endurance to MLA over the sea, and to tanks dry overland?
Mmmmnice is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 06:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern Turkey
Age: 82
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spheroid

Methinks you're talking spheroids. In my 40 years of flying, endurance was always to empty tanks, both military and civilian, but maybe I got it wrong all those years and taught my error to hundreds of trainees.
Whoever is right, there's a serious misunderstanding by some that really needs clearing up - I'm sure there's someone here with the appropriate manuals handy - I've retired.

rts
rodthesod is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 07:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since Linton, many many years ago, and after thousands of hours I have always understood endurance to be the point at which you fell out of the sky. I think it's fair to say that's the RAF understanding of the word.
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 08:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Current RAF teaching:

'Endurance is the length of time that you can remain airborne based on the amount of fuel available until the tanks run dry and the engines flame out.'

'Safe Endurance is the length of time you can remain airborne until the fuel remaining reaches the minimum threshold fuel figure.'
Semicolon is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 08:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flight Ops Dept
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From my Flt Ops/Planning both RAF and Civvie and my PPL P.U/T I too always understood endurance to be the point at which you became a glider.
blue monday is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 08:55
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Middle England
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always thought endurance was judged by the amount of Kokinelli you could drink whilst still being able to follow it up with a 'Full Kebab'!
Jumping_Jack is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 09:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ummmm.. 'endurance' is just that - to tanks empty. In what is probably long oudated parlance, it's when ALERFA becomes DISTRESSFA - i,e., the aeroplane can no longer be in the sky (unless very briefly, with a reassuring swishing sound outside the window familiar to any glider pilots amongst us).

If it's not that, how in the hell do you give an 'endurance' figure to ATC without giving them chapter and verse about your diversion options?

In 40+ years in the business, this is the first time I've ever heard anyone say that endurance is anything but to tanks dry. That's what gets written on the ICAO flight plan.
Wiley is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 10:03
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK, for now.
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mmmmnice,

RN helos tend to use Prudent Limit of Endurance (PLE), which is the point you reach MLA. If you bust MLA you should then be declaring a PAN. This can be made more restrictive for more inexperienced crews/poor weather etc by imposing an additional RAMP fuel on top of MLA.

There's also MIFF (Minimum Indicated Fuel for Flight) which if you go below, it will shortly get very quiet up top, although we don't quote a "time to MIFF".

"Time to Divert" lets the ATC guys know how long they can mess you around in the circuit before you're going to b*gger off and land somewhere else.

The only difference between land or sea ops (besides getting wet) is when overdue action would be instigated - considerably sooner if you're over the sea.
Radar Command T/O is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 16:32
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weston Super Mare/UAE
Age: 60
Posts: 406
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ballsy or what?!!

Sounds like a consensus of opinion has evolved that endurance is to tanks dry whomsoever you work for?! Hope that the ASCOT pilot involved reads this! The Equivocator mentioned that his first answer was probably an off the cuff reply followed, later, by the considered reply. Maybe, but it sounded very much like my teenage daughters attitude on occasion - 'Ive already said an hour and a quarter; weren't you listening?!! Duh!!' (You all must have experience of this!).

BTW, is 'Rodthesod' formerly of MASUAS?
captainsmiffy is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 19:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No Consensus!

In my 22 years in the RN, during the days of JSP 318 and separate coloured pages, 'Endurance' was always defined as time to MLA (Minimum Landing Allowance) as stated by Spheroid.

Time till the engines went quiet was defined as 'Total Endurance'. IIRC this was a 'known' issue when RAF/Army helos were due to embark and a certain ammount of clarification used to go on.

Not sure what the situation is now that its JHC and JSP 500!!
WIGYCIWYT is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 19:29
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South West
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was the water heater on the blink the technical problem ?
Hardly Worth it is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.