Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Halleluejah! CDS "Armed Forces 'stretched beyond their capabilities"

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Halleluejah! CDS "Armed Forces 'stretched beyond their capabilities"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jun 2008, 12:05
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Muscat, Oman
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never mind the dress standards of civil servants, why is the MOD spokesman contradicting the CDS?
Ali Barber is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 12:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Middle England
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
....because they always do! MOD is Government, CDS is Armed Forces.....
Jumping_Jack is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 13:50
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
and have to buy their clothing with their own money.
Cirrus, you kb, so do the military personnel working in MOD!!

I hope CDS sacks the "MOD Spokesman" for contradicting him.
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 14:09
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: england
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Cirrus, be a nice chap and pop over to Innsworth (or wherever clothing stores is nowadays), get some nice free clothes (unfortunately only one colour available) then jump on a plane to the sandpit. Then you can moan about civil servants getting paid less than their uniformed colleagues.
Unfortunately, the MOD civil servant probably does work for Swiss Des and will never get sacked. When was the last time any civil servant was sacked?
Lurking123 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 14:21
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, the Chief of the Defence Staff, admitted the Armed Forces were "stretched beyond the capabilities we have" and could not go on fighting two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.


A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: "The British Armed Forces are very stretched, but not yet overstretched. We continue to invest in our personnel, equipment, training and logistical support."
This reminds me of a record in the late 50s "What the captain really means to say." and others of that ilk;

http://www.pprune.org/forums/militar...s-classic.html
Wader2 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 14:56
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny how this hasn't made any impression on the state funded media website, and the only reference I can find is an opinion piece which seems to suggest that the CDS really didn't mean what he said....

BBC NEWS | UK | Defence chief's warning on forces
Postman Plod is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 16:55
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cirrus, you kb, so do the military personnel working in MOD!
Yes, I know military pay for own clothing while working in MOD - and I have seen the results. My point remains, that the OP belittling an MOD spokesman because of his clothing was pathetic and immature.
CirrusF is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 17:04
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Cirrus, be a nice chap and pop over to Innsworth (or wherever clothing stores is nowadays), get some nice free clothes (unfortunately only one colour available) then jump on a plane to the sandpit. Then you can moan about civil servants getting paid less than their uniformed colleagues.
I'm not moaning about anything - just pointing out a fact. Military have stretched budgets, just like the rest of civil service. Slagging off some MOD spokesman because he doesn't get paid enough to buy decent clothing is not going to win the military any extra budget allocation. Have some respect for the people who support you - or they will not support you.


Unfortunately, the MOD civil servant probably does work for Swiss Des and will never get sacked. When was the last time any civil servant was sacked?

Err, about as often as military get sacked.
CirrusF is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 21:26
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,085
Received 189 Likes on 72 Posts
I'm a former squaddy grunt who after leaving the UK Army ten years or so ago has subsequently qualified as ATPL, and am now in early 40s.
So just how much of this overstretch are you experiencing?

Yep, thought so. How about a nice big cup of shut the hell up?
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 22:05
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello again Littlewillydiplomat:

As you point out - I am not feeling any stretch at all at the moment (much as you could do with a stretch lol!) but I would rejoin in a flash if they lifted age requirements.
CirrusF is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 11:16
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,085
Received 189 Likes on 72 Posts
Ha, how can I compete with your razor wit?

However stretched we may be, we are not stretched enough to require the services of an armchair Napoleon, keen to dismiss any complaints of overstretch whilst not in a position to offer informed comment.

In fact, you're not CAS are you?
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 11:48
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Just a minor point but the MOD press team are overwhelmingly military staff. Pay a visit to DGMC and you'll see acres of SO2s and SO1s and very few Civil Servants. If you don't like the lines used, then you need to accept that there is a very strong liklihood that a military person came up with it.

As for MOD being Govt - total b*ll****. The MOD is everyone in the building and beyond - strange how you're all so quick to blame the CS for everything that goes wrong, yet as soon as the usual myths about who actually works in MB are quashed, people go quiet...
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 11:51
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MGD - ROTFLMFAO.

I am deducing from your posts and past comments along with your title and I would hazard a guess you are a ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ censored (but I shall ask in a pm with my credentials)

I would surmise if you do what I think you do that you have a far greater idea about overstretch than an "armchair napoleon"

If the men with egg on hat knew all the gripes and shorts they would have kittens.........

tell the troops sausage side about not being overstretched.....

as to the detractors sat on shiny arse, they are all a bunch of remf's
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 11:59
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the Outside
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While MGD and cirrusfrance trade blows with handbags, the Torygraph has come up with an interesting think-piece:

Armed Forces: Why the top brass broke ranks - Telegraph

Equally interesting is the venom apparent in the comments from readers - some appear to blame the current shower in Government, others look back to Options for Change, whereas a few blame the senior officers in the military! There does seem to be a consensus, however, that a military coup would not find itself short of public support...

But then this is the Torygraph.
noregrets is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 12:19
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Armchair Napoleon is quite a fitting descriptor really

The cloudy frog tells us that

"As you point out - I am not feeling any stretch at all at the moment (much as you could do with a stretch lol!) but I would rejoin in a flash if they lifted age requirements."

Click on the link below, scroll down the page and check out the CV of a true hero, SAC Gary "Tommo" Thompson who, at a ripe old age paid the ultimate sacrifice, god rest his soul.

http://www.pprune.org/forums/militar...iment-cas.html

Armchair Napolean.............................seems about right
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 13:45
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jimlad1
As for MOD being Govt - total b*ll****. The MOD is everyone in the building and beyond - strange how you're all so quick to blame the CS for everything that goes wrong, yet as soon as the usual myths about who actually works in MB are quashed, people go quiet...
Whilst this may be true it is not the public perception nor even the semi-professional assessment here on pprune.

The perception reality is that armed forces = good - MOD (Centre) = bad

By extension armed forces equates to uniforms and therefore Centre equates to civil servants.

This means that anyone in the Centre, not in a uniform, is a civil servant.

As for civil servants being Government, this of course is wrong as the whole civil service system serves the Government in power and is not, ipso facto, the Government.
Wader2 is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 13:51
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
"By extension armed forces equates to uniforms and therefore Centre equates to civil servants.

This means that anyone in the Centre, not in a uniform, is a civil servant."

Fair point - and a bloody good reason why staff in the centre should wear uniform, so people realise just how dominated MB is by military personnel. I was amazed at the RAF 90th b'day just how many RAF personnel worked in MB.
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 14:14
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly Jimlad
Wader2 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2008, 17:17
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a socially and morally bankrupt country.
The problem is it will take some something disastrous in military terms to force a true realisation of how bad things are. And looking at the age of some of our passenger jets, it might not be the enemy who cause it...depending on who you define as 'the enemy'.
dallas is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2008, 17:53
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,085
Received 189 Likes on 72 Posts
looking at the age of some of our passenger jets, it might not be the enemy who cause it...depending on who you define as 'the enemy'.
Lets hope not. Tragic way to prove a point.
minigundiplomat is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.