PM vows to 'reward' forces
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
....like tax free wage on Det, and stop the Bulls*t about 'package' wage. No-one really counts Gym membership as salary, just as so called reduced housing as a 'benefit'. Now it would be a benefit if the housing had the same 'conditions' as a 'normal' rented tennant - ie call to plumber gets tradesman on time with 'comeback' if the job is shoddy...etc
...anyway, back to being shot at......
...actually why should I continue to get shot at, I think I will go to the public sector and pay for my dentist, beats comming home in a C-17 under a flag.
..no disrespect intended to my brethren who have .
...anyway, back to being shot at......
...actually why should I continue to get shot at, I think I will go to the public sector and pay for my dentist, beats comming home in a C-17 under a flag.
..no disrespect intended to my brethren who have .
Guest
Posts: n/a
Agree 100% with JackRyan, this is all spin and made to think soldiers are doing ok and its not
The forces have been run down to the bone, and it's developing osteoporosis.
ImageGear
For what it is worth, Labour were not voted in "by the vast majority of this country"!
It was in the region of 34-38% last time (can't remember exactly, I think it was 34%), and that was the lowest % vote for a government in years. For what it is worth, any party that gets 40% of the vote will be the next government, because we have a first past the post system, and generally 3 parties competing which splits the vote.
Sorry if I have diverted off track slightly......back to the mainstream of the thread!
For what it is worth, Labour were not voted in "by the vast majority of this country"!
It was in the region of 34-38% last time (can't remember exactly, I think it was 34%), and that was the lowest % vote for a government in years. For what it is worth, any party that gets 40% of the vote will be the next government, because we have a first past the post system, and generally 3 parties competing which splits the vote.
Sorry if I have diverted off track slightly......back to the mainstream of the thread!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You should listen to The Old Fat One, he is making a lot of sense. I have no idea what is the "right" amount for any rank in the services but I do know you cannot compare it with life outside. Why not quote the GROSS ANNUAL pay of a middle ranking officer and compare that with the wonderful world of civilian life where EVERYTHING you want has to be paid for out of your taxed income? Yes everything - work clothes, pensions, training, education, health care, no job security, etc etc. It is not all a bed of roses on the other side. Can some kind soul tell us then what you would expect an RAF Flt.Lt to earn gross with or without flying pay as an example and then perhaps we can get a measure of how much more needs to be paid.
Does anyone have any idea of the costs from the budget of pensions and retired pay? It may surprise you how much of the budget goes on that.
What about everyone being responsible for cutting out waste and any savings added to pay and allowances. Who was responsible for buying unuseable Chinooks for example and do they still have a job? In the civilian world such a monumental cock up would have led to instant dismissal and possibly other implications. At the very least you people in theatre could well do with them to use and yet it has only just surfaced. Explain who was responsible and how you stop it happening again and again and again. Then you would (I hope) get better equipment and more money out of the budget for direct pay etc.
I support all of you but you need to get real as well.
Does anyone have any idea of the costs from the budget of pensions and retired pay? It may surprise you how much of the budget goes on that.
What about everyone being responsible for cutting out waste and any savings added to pay and allowances. Who was responsible for buying unuseable Chinooks for example and do they still have a job? In the civilian world such a monumental cock up would have led to instant dismissal and possibly other implications. At the very least you people in theatre could well do with them to use and yet it has only just surfaced. Explain who was responsible and how you stop it happening again and again and again. Then you would (I hope) get better equipment and more money out of the budget for direct pay etc.
I support all of you but you need to get real as well.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes
on
16 Posts
In the civilian world such a monumental cock up would have led to instant dismissal and possibly other implications.
In the civilian sector at a level where you would be making purchase decisions involving such large amounts of money as in the Chinook fiasco you are pretty much well looked after whatever happens. Do well and you get a nice big bonus, do poorly and you get a nice big severance payment.
Since I left the RAF last year I've been working for the worlds largest logistics company and in that time one huge cock-up I've seen (resulting in half a million being spent on an unusable white elephant of a system) actually led to the culprit being promoted to get them away from the scene of their crime.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 250 ft agl
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since I left the RAF last year I've been working for the worlds largest logistics company and in that time one huge cock-up I've seen (resulting in half a million being spent on an unusable white elephant of a system) actually led to the culprit being promoted to get them away from the scene of their crime.
SMT
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes
on
16 Posts
Not yet.
If you see little yellow vans with red writing on them appearing on RAF stations you'll know its only a matter of time.
If you see little yellow vans with red writing on them appearing on RAF stations you'll know its only a matter of time.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Age: 52
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Working Hard/Old Fat one
I don't think for a minute that either of you has quite picked up the point here. No-one thinks life in civvie street is easier nor are the streets paved with gold.
I think what serving members of HM Forces (and their families
)are trying to highlight is that under the Military Covemant the Government and subjects of Her Majesty ask these men and women to risk their lives. Regularly. Which they do in War and in training. Young men and women are gladly serving their country at the risk that they will not return, experience horrfic events or see close friends and colleagues die.
I think for this they deserve to be financially secure for the rest of their lives.
Contrary to popular public opinion, we do not get free housing, we get no more free healthcare than you do (I have to pay for my dentistry), we get no choice regarding the house we live in or it's location (how many civvies would allow a private letting company to dictate to them where to live despite paying rent for the property). We can be told to move with as little as six weeks notice with no chance of getting our chidren into the local school. Spouses have to give up well paid jobs with Life Insurance and Pensions to follow the serving spouse to keep the family together. I could recount toe-curling tales of how badly I and others have been treated when things have gone wrong. We move so often it is not viable to buy our own home and so are now priced out of the ludicrous UK housing market. My spouses specialist pay is not pensionable, so his final pension given his job is laughable. They have no right to strike and no union representation. What would YOU need to be paid to put up with this and protect your country and her allies?
So I shall pre-empt what I guess will be your response - 'You knew the score when you joined'. EXACTLY. Given these frankly ludicrous conditions of employment, men and women STILL take on this role and are willing to die in order to protect you and yours. Don't they deserve the very best of your Governments care and your gratitude for what they do in your name? If ever the world descends into war again, it's people like this that stand between you, your freedom and some tyrant. I hope sir that you never need them
I'm proud to be married to a serving member, and proud to count so many others doing this job as my friends.
I think what serving members of HM Forces (and their families
)are trying to highlight is that under the Military Covemant the Government and subjects of Her Majesty ask these men and women to risk their lives. Regularly. Which they do in War and in training. Young men and women are gladly serving their country at the risk that they will not return, experience horrfic events or see close friends and colleagues die.I think for this they deserve to be financially secure for the rest of their lives.
Contrary to popular public opinion, we do not get free housing, we get no more free healthcare than you do (I have to pay for my dentistry), we get no choice regarding the house we live in or it's location (how many civvies would allow a private letting company to dictate to them where to live despite paying rent for the property). We can be told to move with as little as six weeks notice with no chance of getting our chidren into the local school. Spouses have to give up well paid jobs with Life Insurance and Pensions to follow the serving spouse to keep the family together. I could recount toe-curling tales of how badly I and others have been treated when things have gone wrong. We move so often it is not viable to buy our own home and so are now priced out of the ludicrous UK housing market. My spouses specialist pay is not pensionable, so his final pension given his job is laughable. They have no right to strike and no union representation. What would YOU need to be paid to put up with this and protect your country and her allies?
So I shall pre-empt what I guess will be your response - 'You knew the score when you joined'. EXACTLY. Given these frankly ludicrous conditions of employment, men and women STILL take on this role and are willing to die in order to protect you and yours. Don't they deserve the very best of your Governments care and your gratitude for what they do in your name? If ever the world descends into war again, it's people like this that stand between you, your freedom and some tyrant. I hope sir that you never need them
I'm proud to be married to a serving member, and proud to count so many others doing this job as my friends.
Why not quote the GROSS ANNUAL pay of a middle ranking officer and compare that with the wonderful world of civilian life where EVERYTHING you want has to be paid for out of your taxed income? Yes everything - work clothes, pensions, training, education, health care, no job security, etc etc. It is not all a bed of roses on the other side.
Too simplistic I am afraid. I can pick holes in your statement straight away. Work clothes - there are lots of companies out there that provide working clothes. Pensions - agree if it is contributory or private pension scheme. Training - lots of companies still provide training, particularly if keen on IIP. Education - all free to everyone if you use the state system. Health care - all free if you use the NHS. No job security - also more true of the armed forces now than it used to be.
Can some kind soul tell us then what you would expect an RAF Flt.Lt to earn gross with or without flying pay as an example and then perhaps we can get a measure of how much more needs to be paid.
Fix some of these and you may be on the way to redressing the balance.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wilts
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the civilian world such a monumental cock up would have led to instant dismissal and possibly other implications.
I agree there should be sackings for failure, but don't try and make out the civilian world is any better than the military. Let's face it most of the equipment overspends are down to civilian companies not being up to the job, and the military having to plough on through political expediency.
Also, if anyone thinks this will be any different under the Tories I'm afraid you live in cloud cuckoo land - look how quiet they are being on this subject, let's hear what Liam Fox and Dave C propose.
Last edited by 8-15fromOdium; 6th Jun 2008 at 11:59. Reason: here/hear
Gordo and Swiss Des will run down the forces pay to minimum sustainable to be able to keep people in this financially strapped time. When there is not much out there and bad financial times in civvy street, they figure there will not be a retention or recruitment problem.
They say they can't afford to give government employees any more than 2 % rise but they can afford 112 million or so in order to let pensioners swim for free, wonder when they will remove their heads from up their rses?
Glad I'm out.
Doc C
They say they can't afford to give government employees any more than 2 % rise but they can afford 112 million or so in order to let pensioners swim for free, wonder when they will remove their heads from up their rses?
Glad I'm out.
Doc C
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gents there is good and bad on the outside, My quality of life is waaaaay up on where it was when I was in. OK I have a higher stress level now but I have a lovely wife and a nice home to live in......
The only thing I had then but don't now was Dental Care, If you loosely call it that. Private is much better than those butchers
The only thing I had then but don't now was Dental Care, If you loosely call it that. Private is much better than those butchers
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 70
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gym membership
Small point - but since when has an RAF gymnasium compared to a civilian gym (and I have been members of both)?
Last time I looked our RAF gym wasn't air-conditioned, didn't have lockable lockers, not enough machines to go around and they lacked flat screen TVs with personal headsets. I won't even go into the lack of a pool, refreshments, state of the showers etc.
Last time I looked our RAF gym wasn't air-conditioned, didn't have lockable lockers, not enough machines to go around and they lacked flat screen TVs with personal headsets. I won't even go into the lack of a pool, refreshments, state of the showers etc.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 80
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Say what you like, how you like and when you like but this is still Jam Tomorrow which is how this lot operate - unless it's anything to do with MPs' allowances and expenses when it's instant. 
Last edited by exscribbler; 6th Jun 2008 at 13:50. Reason: Addition
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wilts
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Following on from ExScribbler, I picked this up from the Goat:
Link is: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/nomoreofourmoney/
We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to lead all MP's in rejecting both a £15,000 pay rise and an unaccountable £23,000 grant. Further we the undersigned pledge to reject at the Polls every sitting MP who votes in favour of such measures. More details
Lets call their bluff
Using the figures provided by Jack Ryan, everyone gets benefits that cost the MOD approx £9700 per year. The answer is, stop all the benefits, no more pensions, no more gyms, no more op allowances, no more subsidised accommodation and food and give everyone in the armed forces regardless of rank a pay rise of £9700 per year. This is totally affordable as it is self financing.
If the MOD figures are correct, this would SAVE the Government money, because they would reap 20% (or 40%) tax plus National insurance on the extra pay, they would not have to maintain MQs (or whatever they are called this week), there would be no need to supply food (other than on Ops) and the savings on pensions to the Defence budget would be huge.
Individuals would be up to £6000 per year net better off. Adding those accommodation and food costs already incurred, you could rent a reasonable place, get good dental care a gym membership and a higher quality of life with the extra income.
Will it happen? I have more chance of a threesome with Keira Knightley and Julia Roberts!
Such a suggestion (the extra money not my threesome), would expose the hypocrisy of this bankrupt (morally) government, and would rubbish they claims that the armed forces cost them such huge amounts of money.
Shadwell
If the MOD figures are correct, this would SAVE the Government money, because they would reap 20% (or 40%) tax plus National insurance on the extra pay, they would not have to maintain MQs (or whatever they are called this week), there would be no need to supply food (other than on Ops) and the savings on pensions to the Defence budget would be huge.
Individuals would be up to £6000 per year net better off. Adding those accommodation and food costs already incurred, you could rent a reasonable place, get good dental care a gym membership and a higher quality of life with the extra income.
Will it happen? I have more chance of a threesome with Keira Knightley and Julia Roberts!
Such a suggestion (the extra money not my threesome), would expose the hypocrisy of this bankrupt (morally) government, and would rubbish they claims that the armed forces cost them such huge amounts of money.
Shadwell
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Age: 52
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Old Fat One
I dont think I saw anything that wasn't there.And I don't wish to assume that you are Mr Uninformed Civvy with an axe to grind. And this was also a reply to Working Hard. I was merely pointing out that the benefits that are given are the very least that should be offered. Dental care is not given to serving members out of the goodness of the MODs heart - can't fight/fly with toothache can you? And as an ex-NHS employee I was on a final salary pension considerably better than that my spouse has at the moment. So to say when we get out it will all end I say thank heaven to the durge that WILL end. It isn't just about pay - it's quality of life for a young family now - we have to make so many compromises and that should be recognised. I'd rather be on an MPs salary with his/her huge allowance package thank you. And no threat of being blown out of the sky.
Why is it when nurses and firemen complain they get full support yet get paid more? And it isn't just lower ranks who should receive a pay increase. Look at the lovely new accom. blocks they are all receiving and look at the state of Sgts/Wo Messes across the board. You wouldn't put prisoners in most of them.The Government will spin this so that Joe Public thinks poor Tommy is getting a better deal. He won't. They will give with one hand and take away with another.
I have worked in the Public Secor for Governement bodies nearly all my professional life. It is sad when I feel I got a better deal. Wish I was an SCE teacher in Germany. They get paid more than most serving NCOs and get their housing free. Wish Joe Public knew about that one.
Why is it when nurses and firemen complain they get full support yet get paid more? And it isn't just lower ranks who should receive a pay increase. Look at the lovely new accom. blocks they are all receiving and look at the state of Sgts/Wo Messes across the board. You wouldn't put prisoners in most of them.The Government will spin this so that Joe Public thinks poor Tommy is getting a better deal. He won't. They will give with one hand and take away with another.
I have worked in the Public Secor for Governement bodies nearly all my professional life. It is sad when I feel I got a better deal. Wish I was an SCE teacher in Germany. They get paid more than most serving NCOs and get their housing free. Wish Joe Public knew about that one.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South West
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So much for "Other perks including dental care and free eye tests: £510"
I wasn't overly impressed with the dental care last time I went to an RAF dental centre. When I asked about a "scale and polish", I was told that the shortage of dentists/dental technicians meant they did no "preventative" work. Whilst I now have to pay for dental care, I have whatever treatment I want/need whenever is most convenient for me.
My new employer also provides free eye tests - I think it's mandatory under Health and Safety for employers to provide tests for computer-users.
And if you want an idea of how much RAF gym-membership is worth, I paid £50 per year when I joined an RAF Stn gym as a civvy.
N Joe
I wasn't overly impressed with the dental care last time I went to an RAF dental centre. When I asked about a "scale and polish", I was told that the shortage of dentists/dental technicians meant they did no "preventative" work. Whilst I now have to pay for dental care, I have whatever treatment I want/need whenever is most convenient for me.
My new employer also provides free eye tests - I think it's mandatory under Health and Safety for employers to provide tests for computer-users.
And if you want an idea of how much RAF gym-membership is worth, I paid £50 per year when I joined an RAF Stn gym as a civvy.
N Joe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WorkingHard
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...ntervenes.html
I'm sure most on this board have got two stripes / three pips of some variety and colour, and a set of wings. I'd suggest that although we don't receive civilian levels of pay, it's not too bad and I'm certainly not complaining about myself. I didn't join to get rich (and it certainly isn't happening). What I do wish to complain about is the £12000 starting salary for the privates. Did the Rt Hon Des Browne watch Ross Kemp in Afghanistan? Of course, he was probably putting his secondary duty of the MOD to one side whilst concentrating on his far more important and primary role of being Secretary of State for Scotland.
Nevermind me, £12000 doesn't do our lads justice. I hope you agree.
Can some kind soul tell us then what you would expect an RAF Flt.Lt to earn gross with or without flying pay as an example and then perhaps we can get a measure of how much more needs to be paid.
Soldiers in basic training are paid £12,572 a year, while traffic wardens receive a basic starting salary of around £17,000. More than 20,000 personnel left the Forces last year, many citing the poor salary as their reason.
The Ministry of Defence says that after recent pay rises, most fully-trained soldiers are now paid more than £16,000 and bonuses for serving on the front line in Iraq and Afghanistan can take a private's salary to £22,000.
But Gen Dannatt insisted that more money was needed.
The Ministry of Defence says that after recent pay rises, most fully-trained soldiers are now paid more than £16,000 and bonuses for serving on the front line in Iraq and Afghanistan can take a private's salary to £22,000.
But Gen Dannatt insisted that more money was needed.
Nevermind me, £12000 doesn't do our lads justice. I hope you agree.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: wiltshire
Age: 48
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do feel as though this 'benefits' package is over-inflated. For example, the price I pay for my Quarter is about market rate. Nobody in civvie street would pay any more for this wreck(and thats before DHE/MHS are brought into the equation). The gyms on the previous 3 stations I've been on have been just about adequate but certainly not of the JJB/ David Lloyd etc standard. Most civvie compabies offer private health care for their employees and their families. All this and as everyone keeps saying, the civvie doesn't have to do lots of time away from home and get shot at!