Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Yanks in the Falklands War?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Yanks in the Falklands War?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st May 2008, 07:26
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ELINT by our ( & possibly other peoples' ) sub's yes as far as I know - but how was even a U.S. carrier going to accommodate an E-3 ?!

I rather doubt the U.S. wanted assets other than satellites too near.

If R.N. TLAM's had been available, it might have been extremely tempting to chuck some towards the Arg' airbases, in conventional cluster mode, though that would mean a distinct escalation; as it was I understand we sent some people even more problematical for the enemy, though mainly in a recce' role - full story yet to be released to the likes of me.
Double Zero is offline  
Old 22nd May 2008, 22:48
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with Dave AWACS were never there, myths grow arms and legs and Marr should know better or do some proper research!

Last edited by bondo; 23rd May 2008 at 06:18.
bondo is offline  
Old 23rd May 2008, 00:12
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Chileans had good reasons of their own for placing such a radar near the Arg' border ( though maybe asking for something nasty & pointy to come the other way ) - but that would have instantly meant 2 fronts, which the Arg's had probably seen enough history to be wary of - or maybe even had real ' 4th Reich ' advisors along to avoid that one !

I understood from very good sources the Chileans, who are a good lot - then again so are the Argentinians when not led / forced by idiots ! - Were well rewarded by the U.K. For their help, no delay or messing around - but as it's only been hinted at in anything I've seen published, I'd better shut up, sure you'll all agree with that.
Double Zero is offline  
Old 23rd May 2008, 11:21
  #164 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Talking to an undercover Gen Eng fitter back in '86, he told me that Maplin electronics had foiled an Argentinian plot, to purchase 7000 miles of Twin and Earth electrical flex, via numerous single orders to their mail order catalogue.

Enough flex to enable one their electric subs to operate off the south coast of the UK.

That could have been disastrous for the departing task force.
AR1 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2008, 12:10
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: There and here
Posts: 2,867
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Talking to an undercover Gen Eng fitter back in '86, he told me that Maplin electronics had foiled an Argentinian plot, to purchase 7000 miles of Twin and Earth electrical flex, via numerous single orders to their mail order catalogue.
Shurely you musht be mishtakin shir (bad Sean Connery accent)




SHJ

Last edited by SpringHeeledJack; 23rd May 2008 at 13:17.
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Old 23rd May 2008, 13:12
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dorset
Age: 52
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AIM-9Ls

"I'm not sure the US of A directly supplied AIM 9-Ls,"

IIRC, Andy McNab, according to one of his biogs, babysat an airfreight load of them back to the UK from US.

Could be wrong, but my 2p worth
Goffee is offline  
Old 23rd May 2008, 13:26
  #167 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
9-L

Always wondered. Were they really that significant given that (as far as I can make out) any engagements were made by our lads achieving the golden shot from behind.

Thoughts /experience?
AR1 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2008, 15:07
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manuel de Vol. The Asi tanker was indeed from the Maersk Line. As were several other Tankers, Ships Taken Up From Trade, she was chartered directly by the MoD. As I remember her, she had less "oily" decks than the BP River Class STUFTs and played less part in destroying a perfectly good pair of leather work shoes!
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 23rd May 2008, 15:50
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Long wired sub'

Well I suppose it's an idea, to trail a wire all the way from Argentina to the UK, - there are plenty of transatlantic cables, but they are very heavy ( even with light-bulb style twin core, how much do you reckon 8000 miles would weigh !!!) laid from specialised ships which might rather draw attention in several ways .

The Argentinians came up with some good ideas, and I don't reckon they would have contemplated this one !
Double Zero is offline  
Old 23rd May 2008, 15:56
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Knowing Maplins they would have sent the wrong type anyway.....
Eagle402 is offline  
Old 28th May 2008, 13:03
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 898
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
I'm surprised, given the frequent cites of VULCAN 607, no-one's mentioned that it explicitly states that a UK delegation including the Government Chief Scientist (Professor Ronald Mason) and Defence Secretary (John Nott) went to the US to ask for satellite imagery and were refused.
There was no satellite imagery from the Americans. Neither Professor Ronald Mason, the government's chief scientific adviser, nor the Defence Secretary, John Nott, were able to persuade them to divert a KH-11 satellite away from NATO duties, much to both men's frustration.
Page 173 of the Corgi softback edition.
steamchicken is offline  
Old 28th May 2008, 19:23
  #172 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Not to suggest in any way that an E3 was actually able to provide surveillance but just to make sure you are looking at the right map.

From Panama City to west of the FI, ie over Chile, is well within range of an E3. Without FR it would have to recover to a Chilean base but with FR it could even recover to Panama City.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 28th May 2008, 19:28
  #173 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
is well within range of an E3.
African or European?











No, don't get up. I'll show myself out.......................
 
Old 28th May 2008, 19:44
  #174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Some-r-set
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
African or European?
I know have the scene on the bridge in my head

High_lander is offline  
Old 28th May 2008, 20:46
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Well, Lincolnshire
Age: 69
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will we ever know the truth?

I hope not.

Just in case there's a repeat performance.

Big brother is/maybe/could be watching and.................

Oh, say! can you see by the dawn's early light
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming;
taxydual is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2008, 08:29
  #176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: France
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harrier/F5 DACT

Just read your article whilst looking for something else. I too was an ATCO (Mil) at Eastern during the work up for the Falklands. I distinctly remember taking a flight of F5's out of Alconbury to work in the Wash ATA. when they came on frequency they asked where the Harriers were!
Midland radar operated the Wash ATA so someone from there may remember more details.

Bucketyr
bucketyr is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2008, 12:02
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Falklands - Harrier

The Aim9L's had just been on the first FRS1 trials; RN Test Pilot Taylor Scott ( and I suspect some other T'P's ) made great efforts to ensure the CAP Seajets were equipped with this weapon 'not at the time in the UK inventory' complete with 190 gallon drop tanks & 2 missiles a side - though this made handling tricky, and some reports ( from Test Pilots who were there ) reckoned the mod's never got there in time.

More to add shortly...

DZ
Double Zero is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2008, 12:35
  #178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,825
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
More to add shortly...
OK - but please no more apostrophe abuse!
BEagle is online now  
Old 13th Sep 2008, 18:35
  #179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'''' Hi Beagle ! ''''

I was just going to add, on a serious note, that the first Sea Harrier to fly ( XZ450, in the hands of John Farley, August 1978 ) was also set up & instrumented for the Sea Eagle anti-ship missile - a more intelligent & harder hitting thing than the Exocet.

Sadly ( to say the least ) this aircraft was the first victim to ground fire, on an early iron bomb raid into Goose Green.

Pilot Nick Taylor didn't have a chance to get out, but the story goes that when the Argentines found the missile control panel, they wrongly assumed the fleet were ready to go with the weapon.
Double Zero is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2008, 22:19
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Larger tanks and twin (4) missile fit didn't make it in time for the end of hostilities.
XV277 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.