Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

OOOps Reaper UAV down

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

OOOps Reaper UAV down

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jun 2008, 07:15
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this the same Reaper referred to in the comments section of this "exclusive" from the Lincolnshire Echo (second only to The Sun for the accuracy of its reports): here.

Interesting, but decidedly disjointed, video may be worth a look.
Ray Dahvectac is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 08:05
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ray Dahvectac
Is this the same Reaper referred to in the comments section of this "exclusive" from the Lincolnshire Echo (second only to The Sun for the accuracy of its reports): here.

Interesting, but decidedly disjointed, video may be worth a look.
Do they really sound like they are dragging tin cans behind them?
XV277 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 10:36
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 70
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ODD It would appear to be in full U.S. colour scheme. Sounds like my old Jawa 49cc moped. All the support crew are in scruffy civvies. Does it really get that dark that quick out there or does it actually take that long to prepare for a flight?
Anyone recognise the unit badges on the "pilots" uniform don't look RAF to me.
Be lucky
David
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 11:53
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not a "British" Reaper, but an American one assigned to the 42nd Attack Squadron (that could be jointly operated by UK personnel but not the case here). The only Brit involvement looks like the Flight Sergeant at the end working as the sensor operator.

There is a better article here.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2025624/posts

Last edited by mick2088; 5th Jun 2008 at 18:19.
mick2088 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 07:49
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 51st State
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Is it correct that the 39 Sqn lost a 2nd Reaper recently?

Last edited by HaveQuick2; 7th Dec 2008 at 08:08.
HaveQuick2 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 09:12
  #26 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Havequick, open source or fishing exped?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 12:36
  #27 (permalink)  
None but a blockhead
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London, UK
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"It's not a "British" Reaper, but an American one assigned to the 42nd Attack Squadron (that could be jointly operated by UK personnel but not the case here). The only Brit involvement looks like the Flight Sergeant at the end working as the sensor operator."

Not that there have been any rumours that due to differences in ROE, it's not unknown for command of some of the more pro-active UAVs to be quietly transferred between Jeeves and Chuck just in time to squeeze one off before the original model aircraft controller slips back into the seat. Or if there are any such rumours, they definitely haven't reached me.

R
Self Loading Freight is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 13:16
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,506
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Would a remote pilot be eligible for a remote AFC if he/she saves a stricken Reaper by executing a brilliant forced landing within reach of friendly forces?
brakedwell is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 13:54
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 51st State
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
PN wrote "Havequick, open source or fishing exped?"

Neither. Just idly enquiring after hearing something along theose lines this weekend.
HaveQuick2 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 14:38
  #30 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Ok, fishing then
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 16:43
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Saaaaaarf
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLF

"It's not a "British" Reaper, but an American one assigned to the 42nd Attack Squadron (that could be jointly operated by UK personnel but not the case here). The only Brit involvement looks like the Flight Sergeant at the end working as the sensor operator."

Not that there have been any rumours that due to differences in ROE, it's not unknown for command of some of the more pro-active UAVs to be quietly transferred between Jeeves and Chuck just in time to squeeze one off before the original model aircraft controller slips back into the seat. Or if there are any such rumours, they definitely haven't reached me.


That post lost me


sirsaltyhelmet is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2008, 04:04
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the RAF alone in the Loss?

Haven't the USAF and others (Border Patrol etc) lost a few MQ-9s also.?...landing hickups, lost link, rack swap etc....
L J R is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2008, 08:53
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DRONE WARRIORS - British, U.S. Reaper operators fly joint Afghanistan mission


Do the operators really need to wear flying suits ? After all they do not leave the ground.
In these days of 'blue rules' could they not be smartly dressed in their working blues.

Just a thought.

Last edited by philrigger; 9th Dec 2008 at 07:22.
philrigger is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2008, 02:21
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tullahoma TN
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it just me, or is there a flaw in the military thinking here?

It's just you.
Modern Elmo is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2008, 12:07
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Phil, it is a comfort thing, like a comfort blanket.

We used to have the option of doing simulators in uniform or flying suits. In a uniform everything is in the wrong place. No knee pads to scribble notes on, no leg pockets for aide memoires etc.

It would be possible to set your briefcase down and arrange your paperwork a la office, and it is true that Ops Room staff on a ship do not have such comfort blankets so I guess it is what you are trained to use.

It may be a bit like guys flying with lucky charms etc but my flying suit was home to my chinagraphs, pencils, pens etc and they always stayed there, ready to use.
Wader2 is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2008, 13:33
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wader2

Thanks for that. I do see your point.
philrigger is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2008, 13:38
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, must be a real bugger having nowhere to put all those pens in a bloody great portakabin!!!

Fair dues, if you can do a better job because you feel more at home, why the hell not?
VinRouge is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2008, 00:49
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You might be surprised with General Atomics design of the "bloody great portakabin!!!" how much room there is for anything....!

ERgonomics is not one of their forte's
L J R is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2008, 08:07
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bris Vegas Australia
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ergonomics....

Is that the USAF version or did the UK ask for a unique modified ergonomic disaster zone to make the RAF nosegunners feel more at home?
antipodean alligator is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2008, 00:48
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Touche...or words to that effect
L J R is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.