Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Northrup Grumman/EADS win USAF tanker bid

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Northrup Grumman/EADS win USAF tanker bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jun 2008, 00:51
  #301 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pretty bad news for McCain who would have been counting on jobs as a good news in southern states...

http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/s...6/daily61.html
On April 17, Philip Teel, corporate vice president and president of Northrop Grumman's Mission Systems Sector, spoke at the Atlanta Press Club, saying Northrop Grumman would convert planes made by Airbus into KC-45 tankers in Mobile, Ala., but much of the work would be done in Georgia.

"That program will be the cornerstone for a very, very significant aerospace corridor in the Southeast," Teel said. "It's the linchpin for that aerospace corridor."

Teel said that corridor would have include Florida, Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi.
Also - SDD-2 has flown and awaits conversion. What happens to it and SDD-1 if Boeing gets the contract after all?
MarkD is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 03:52
  #302 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sad day for the USAF, they're the real losers out of this. But it would appear that a stronger Boeing is more important than a stronger America.
Point0Five is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 04:39
  #303 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If McCain wins in November would he be able to apply pressure 'in the national interest' to reverse or ignore this recommendation? only asking as the program will now be delayed for a few more years while fresh proposals are organised.

And whats Obama's point of view on this.

My focus on the political element on this matter is understandable due the up coming elections and the follow on effects of any decision.

With this and the CASR-X decision 'i pity da foo' that has to submit to tender any future large US DoD Projects.
Flyingblind is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 07:38
  #304 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Far far away
Age: 53
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The tragedy will be the loss of lives of real warfighters while politicians continue to argue for the sake of their own overstuffed pockets.

The process could now continue in one big closed loop. If NG win again then Boeing already know that they can protest and force another round, and if Boeing win next time then NG will surely protest and rely on the precedent already set by Boeing to force another round, and so it goes on. Meanwhile, Paddy McEvaddy will be onto a real winner over the next 10 years; fair play to him.
D-IFF_ident is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 09:01
  #305 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The biggest loser is the US Air Force.

If a new RFP is issued, another contest will ensue, meaning a possible second protest being lodged by the losing party, thus delaying manufacture and delivery of the tankers it so deperately seeks.
BOEING777X is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 09:15
  #306 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Uk
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If this process keeps being pushed to the right will their become a point at which it becomes uneconomic for boeing to keep the 767 line open for it?
knowitall is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 14:02
  #307 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Obama is likely pro Boeing as Boeing states are mostly Blue States. (although given the way McCain's numbers are going they may all be Blue States soon)

I doubt it's a good idea for McCain or Obama to try and bully through a vendor for paperclips never mind tankers as the Armed Services Committee and others would have a collective $hitfit.
MarkD is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2008, 16:17
  #308 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toulouse area, France
Age: 93
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Labyrinthine

Stepehen Trimble on www.flightglobal.com has a good description of "Round One" (without NG/EADS) and the convolutions involved ... no wonder this round got stuck with an "Offside" call by the referee ... Makes me wonder if Boeing's been taking lessons from Greek mythology and the Minotaur .
Too right, it's USAF wot loses in all this - roll on the demos of A330 capability as the "Footsa" (City of London-like) comes on line, long before DC gets around to a "final" decision.
AirTanker could find itself with a whole lot of custom apart from any British needs ...
Meanwhile, stay tuned for Round 2 (or 3?).
Jig Peter is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2008, 00:40
  #309 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: US
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's put all this in perspective:

Boeing gets caught with hand in till, oop's.

Possible presidential candidate looking for points.

FAR's, and common sense demand two participants for a "full and open competition" to take place.

Who else is out there: Antonov, Tupolev?

NG is approached, encouraged to bid. Only way to fullfull point #3, or reward Boing for bad behaviour, felony(s) and award, but it's election year.

Nobody honestly expected NG to win, period. The French, OOH la la!

But now we have Sarkovsky making I love the US noises.

Boing listen to one set of ex little generals, NG to another.

Guess which set of little ex generals had the most pull?

Don't despair, riding to the rescue of Boing is Made In The USA, yeah, right.

So now we have ignorant little congressmen running around in, guess what, election year, puffing up their chests as the lobbyists blow smoke up their a-sses.

Meanwhile, the fleet ages.

News flash: 6 weeks from now 50 congressmen and women cram onto a stage made for 10. One by one they flap their lips and smile at the cameras.
"Ladies and Gentlemen, we have reviewed this matter, and in the interests of our fighting men and women, American Jobs and solidarity with Europe we hereby announce that NG and Boing have formed a joint venture to produce the next generation of tankers"

The name Boing used above is in satire.

And so, another never ending, ever escalating program is born. Because we have become a nation of whiners!

Brought to you by the folks at the funny shaped building, with love.
fltlt is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2008, 17:56
  #310 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Far far away
Age: 53
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've never understood the anti-French thing with the Americans. The Brits have a long history of warring with France, but America's only real involvement with them was during their own War of Independence, when the French were on their side,. In fact, I understand that France's involvement was a fairly decisive part of England losing. 200 years later, France refuses to join forces with the USA and suddenly they are all 'Cheese eating surrender monkeys'? Truth be told, it's only us Brits who really have a right to call them that.

Bunch of cheese eating surrender monkeys!
D-IFF_ident is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2008, 20:36
  #311 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There was the little matter of France 'pulling chocks' early in WWII.

And De Gaulle saying 'p1ss off' in the 1960s.

But other than that......

--------------------------------------------------------------

McCain doesn't like the USAF and/or Boeing due to some stupidity and corruption in the last few years. He'd be fine with the Airbus, er, NG/Eads win.

Obama, from Illinios, where Boeing is headquartered and wanting the union vote, will support a Boeing win.

Meanwhile, the KC-135 soldiers on and on and on.....
-----------------------------------------------------------------

And to give the French credit, it was their money and their fleet outside Yorktown (situation greatly simplified for brevity's sake) that made the American Revolution a win for our side.

Seems our win had a big influence on them 'outing' Louis a few years later. Sorry about that....
 
Old 21st Jun 2008, 03:02
  #312 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NW FL
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hit a tanker (KC-135R) Mon night...I believe the tail number was 57-something...
US Herk is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 13:29
  #313 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South Carolina
Age: 76
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KC-45A

Meanwhile, the KC-135 soldiers on and on and on...

Well Folks,

I'll say it right up front- my employer is Northrop Grumman in Bethpage, NY (and for those who remember- Grumman Aerospace) and the Division here heads up the E-2C/D, EA-6B and now EA-18G.

Forget about my partisan feeling for the KC-45A, it's the men and women of the USAF who are flying these 50+ year old KC-135's admirably in their
tanking capacity that really counts.

They and the USAF Air Mobility Command are being hurt by this politicking and job issues so that invariably a delay of one to two years has now injected to the schedule. What a shame this has been!

Lee Norberg
Oakdale, NY
Lee Norberg is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2008, 19:12
  #314 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 349
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Interesting article in todays Flightglobal, seems like Boeing did have good grounds to challenge the Air Farce decision.
Having been the recipient of a questionable Gov't agency decision in the past I can fully appreciate their feelings.
fleigle is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2008, 18:51
  #315 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: US
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sec. Gates announced today that the tanker contract will be reopened:

The Air Force will reopen the bidding for a multibillion-dollar contract for midair refueling tankers, the defense secretary, Robert Gates, announced on Wednesday.

The decision comes in the wake of a report by the Government Accountability Office that found flaws in the process that initially awarded the contract to a partnership of Northrop Grumman and the European parent of Airbus over a competing bid by Boeing, which filed a protest.
Full text here: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/bu...l?ref=business
OFBSLF is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2008, 22:48
  #316 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dallas, TX USA
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now if the Air Force (or Pentagon) would kindly specify in the RFP the size and capability of the tanker they want, both contractors can submit their best proposals.
Flight Safety is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 07:17
  #317 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 36 Likes on 14 Posts
So when Boeing get awarded the contract, will EADS be allowed to object?.....









.....No, thought not.




Still, you have to admire the yanks, buy American, keep American jobs.
ZH875 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 08:45
  #318 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Asia's Fine City
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you implying that the US is a protectionist market ?
Surely not.....that would be hypocrisy wouldn't it ?



kluge is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 14:57
  #319 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Are you implying that the US is a protectionist market ?
1. The ruling was made on the merits of the following of the rules of the RFP. Whether EADS/NG or Boeing is the better product is not within my area of expertise. Following the rules, however, is pretty clear cut.

The USAF pooching this twice now is a separate matter.

2. And you'd be any different if you had a British manufacturer still capable of building such?
 
Old 10th Jul 2008, 15:29
  #320 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toulouse area, France
Age: 93
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Ability ...

In order to counter the "might" of the US aircraft builders (there used to be three!!!), Europe's builders got together to form Airbus, with the success we know (and don't get started on your "subsidies" thing or we'll be back into the crafty way Boeing, with the KC-135/707 got into the civil market where it was a nonentity before ...).
With such aircraft as Typhoon, Tornado, Rafale, Gripen, to mention but the fighting machines, and Airbus in the civil market, Europe has the skills to design and build first-class products. Just get used to it, America !!!
Apparently the GAO upheld only 8 out of over 100 pernicketing points raised by the legal eagles from Chicago ... but will the new team be able to sort the thing out before the end of the year ???
Jig Peter is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.