Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

ATC for 60,000ft+

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

ATC for 60,000ft+

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jan 2008, 22:48
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chicken,

Don't worry. It depends on Ht and speed. I challenge any fighter to turn with a U2 at FL600! Ironically, I also challenge him to pull off a hard turn! It's not secrets, its physics!

All (Older) Fighters suffer the same type of limitations, when required to fly high, and slow, admitedly, some more than others. But, when required, and the speed is up........... all can fly and turn just fine. By the way, if my jet can't make the turn, I'm totally sure my AMRAAM or ASRAAM can!!!!

Advo
advocatusDIABOLI is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2008, 11:15
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just so happens that right now theres a U-2 inbound Fairford descending from 63,000ft.

Last edited by Razor61; 26th Jan 2008 at 11:28.
Razor61 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2008, 11:50
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado
Age: 53
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lots of chat here about F3 and its ability to turn, or not, at high level. What about Typhoon? Couldn't it turn with a U2 at 60'k? Even for a little while?

There was talk a few years ago about them relaxing the rules to allow supersonic flight overland at very high level. I assume nothing came of it, because if the rules had been relaxed there might have been a case for lowering the upper limits of controlled airspace (to FL500 say) so that military aircraft could have made more use of 'VFR above'.

Or am I talking bollox?
Gen.Thomas Power is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.