Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

A dereliction of duty

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

A dereliction of duty

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jan 2008, 16:09
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wilts
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tigs, when the problems with legal aid costs with the Herc families became knowledge, the response was staggering. Some highly esteemed barristers came forward and offered their services free of charge. The real problem was the cost of the work done by the solicitor.

I am with you on this, I sincerely hope this is not settled out of court. We all need to know, what exactly a duty of care means and to what extent it exists on the battlefield. I fully expect the MoD to settle this one out of court, sadly it normally involves some kind of gagging order.

These paras have already shown how extraordinarily brave they are, could it be that this is the one?

This is what Ingram stated in a letter to HCDC on 30 Mar 06, in response to my own concerns expressed to HCDC earlier.

"...CSAR;

He is concerned about our CSAR capability for forthcoming operations in Afghanistan and alleges that the Afghanistan task "has all the hallmarks of a rushed deployment". There are rescue plans, but for reasons of operational security, and to protect our troops, I cannot provide details of them; I do not want to compromise the safety of our troops should a situation arise. In terms of our planning for the next stage of tasking in Afghanistan, you will have gathered from the evidence I provided on 7 Mar this year that our deployment of more troops to Afghanistan is long-planned and part of a coherent international plan...."

Last edited by nigegilb; 13th Jan 2008 at 16:33.
nigegilb is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 17:30
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Minigundiplomat Wrote:

It doesn't say if his son was in Iraq or Afghanistan, but if he was in Afghanistan there would have been a Chinook, with a team of medics including a surgeon on 30 min standby to pick hime up anywhare in the AO.

Weather, servicability and workload are just not a factor. The IRT IS OUR NO 1 PRIORITY.

Can't speak for Iraq.
For the record the same goes for the IRT in Iraq - it is our number 1 priority and Merlins carry a team of doctors, nurses and medics. It goes without saying we pull out all of the stops to get injured soldiers to hospital in the shortest possible time.

I am sure the Chinook crew did all that they could to try and recover Cpl Mark Wright and his colleagues - if there had been a way I'm sure they would have found it and made it happen.

GB2
Green Bottle 2 is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 17:37
  #23 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Wingswinger
What sort of bonus do MoD Civil Servants get for coming up with ways of making savings on/reductions to the defence budget?

I think we should know.
Actually it is probably none.

The bonus system was imposed by the Treasury and heartily disliked as a pointless and divisive exercise.

The key to a bonus is meeting one's annual objectives that have been agreed with one's line manager. The harder the objectives the higher the bonus in one of only 4 layers - approximately these are £0 - £700 - £1200 - £1600. Peanuts really at the workers' grades.

A bonus can be awarded even is some objectives have not been met. Equally no bonus might be awarded even if all objectives are met.

Objectives are set and agreed in May (last year). When I get mine I will let you know how difficult they were.

PS, sorry I forgot, my Line Manager said he would not be setting objectives this year but would discuss our performance in the mid-year review in November.

PPS, sorry forgot again. He said he would not be doing a mid-year review as he did not believe in them, unless we wanted one. Man after my own heart.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 17:44
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Button Moon.
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You've saved me the trouble Pontius......

Last edited by Duckandcover; 13th Jan 2008 at 18:36.
Duckandcover is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 18:33
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somerset
Age: 68
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wingswinger
What sort of bonus do MoD Civil Servants get for coming up with ways of making savings on/reductions to the defence budget?
You make it sound as though this was the sole remit of MoD civil servants.

WRT to the winch situation I would like to offer some conjecture.

The person i/c winches is dealing with winches not aircraft, and may not have had the benefit of a military officer in the decision chain who could point out the operational impact of withdrawing all winches from service simultaneously. Why the SEngOs concerned were ignored/didn't protest (delete as applicable) is also a mystery.

This is why it is so important for IPTs to have a military presence.

And for those dyed in the wool despisers of civil servants there are a lot of ex-military in the MoD; some of whom completely p**s off their colleagues because they focus on the front line not the bottom line.
Riskman is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 18:33
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In the dark
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was out on Saudi in 2003 with the F3s who were enforcing the southern no fly zone. One day all flying was cancelled as due to a few broken A10s there FOB commander decided there was not adequate CSAR cover. Another A10 was immediately flown in from Germany and flight resumed as soon as it was ready.

So the US Military wont put the people under their command into harms way without effective CSAR so why do the UK Military? When proper CSAR assets are not available the USAF pulled out all the stop to get aircraft into theatre at commendable speed. The RAF can't, they don't have the aircraft or the resources.
FormerFlake is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 18:37
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Москва/Ташкент
Age: 54
Posts: 922
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Glad the BOI set out the facts... straight.

However, this Government is absolutely shameless. Expect the white paint (always on tap with them) to be liberally applied.

Lads - my respects. Is their any sort of fund we can contribute to assist their legal battle?
flash8 is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 19:54
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A real shame. I had not seen the full story of what happened that sad day.

I just think to be there for 5 hours bleeding your life ebbing away, waiting ...and waiting.

You choose to serve but when things go wrong you just get cr@ped on. So glad my kids do not want to join the services.
blogger is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 20:07
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Age: 61
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my son goes out to the "stan" in the very near future, but as i live in nottingham i should have no problem making sure he has the right kit- pistols, ak47s etc
mr fish is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 20:10
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,764
Received 228 Likes on 71 Posts
So glad my kids do not want to join the services.
blogger, You say what others like myself have dared not to, and to which I have to add; thank God for the kids of other parents who do! If ever there were a reason for the likes of us then, who come what may will be spared the anguish of Cpl Wright's parents and loved ones, to strive to ensure the quantity and quality of the kit with which his like are sent out to fight on our behalf, then this is it. In both regards there are woeful deficiencies. No-one in Whitehall should sleep at night until they are put right. Neither should we.
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 21:13
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The report is quite damming - I cannot imagine what it was like for the guy dying there on the ground.
RileyDove is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 21:53
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wilts
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thought I would post an extract of Sean's article on the tragedy written in June of last year.

Wounded British troops are being evacuated from the battlefield more slowly than the Americans managed in Vietnam 40 years ago, one of the Army's most senior surgeons has revealed.



Lt Col Paul Parker says hospitals could run out of blood, oxygen and drugs if more than two seriously wounded troops arrived at the same time

In a withering attack on defence medical policy, Lt Col Paul Parker condemned the treatment of injured troops in Iraq and Afghanistan as being "excessively slow". He blamed the delays on "too much middle management".

Several soldiers have died in Afghanistan following delays in deploying a helicopter and medical crew, The Sunday Telegraph has learnt.

Col Parker, an orthopaedic surgeon who has served on operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Balkans and Sierra Leone, said a fundamental failing of British defence policy was that the military still lacked a "dedicated all-weather medical helicopter fleet", specifically designed to rescue battlefield casualties.

He also said that British hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan could not cope with mass casualty emergencies and could run out of blood, oxygen and drugs if more than two seriously wounded troops arrived at the same time.

Col Parker, 45, who is parachute-trained and has served on numerous special forces operations, is the first British officer publicly to voice his concerns over the treatment of casualties.

Writing in the Royal Army Medical Corps Journal, he said: "In Vietnam, wounded soldiers arrived in hospital within 25 minutes of injury. In Iraq in 2005, that figure is 110 minutes, on Operation Herrick IV, (Afghanistan 2006 ) the average pre-hospital time was seven hours. A casevac [casualty evacuation] request has to go through too many layers of command. There seems little point in providing high-technology in-hospital care when our patients still take several hours to travel a few miles to us.

"We use support or anti-tank helicopters that are re-roled on an ad hoc basis for the critical care and transport of our sickest patients. We still do not have a dedicated all-weather military helicopter evacuation fleet. Should we not be asking why? We have gone backwards in terms of our evacuation time-lines."

Col Parker said that the limitations of the medical facilities available in Afghanistan were such that just two seriously injured casualties could "exhaust" the available blood, drugs and oxygen kept at the main medical centre in Camp Bastion in only "17 hours".



Tony Blair promised that commanders in Afghanistan could have whatever equipment they needed to achieve their mission

He described the British ambulances as "antediluvian" and revealed that the laboratory at Camp Bastion, which is used to match blood and test samples, had to close between 11.30am and 3.30pm because the air-conditioning system could not keep the temperature below 97F (36C).

He also revealed that there had been no CT scanner, which is used in the diagnosis of brain injury, in the field hospital in Afghanistan for more than a year. A unit finally arrived in Helmand province this month.

Last year, Tony Blair promised that commanders in Afghanistan could have whatever equipment they needed to achieve their mission. He said in a radio interview: "Whatever package they want, we will do."

A senior colleague of Col Parker said that his report had the support of every member of the defence medical services and that it was regarded by the Ministry of Defence as an "inconvenient truth".

Last year, Cpl Mark Wright and six other soldiers spent six hours in a minefield in Afghanistan because no suitable helicopter was available to rescue them. Cpl Wright died of his injuries and three survivors had legs amputated.
nigegilb is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2008, 23:43
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Some-r-set
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know I won't be seeing a f****ng bonus.

As mentioned before, I had most delight in seeing Military and ex-Military Civil servents slugging it out with 'finance depts' and industry, focusing more on troops in slightly warm and dusty places rather then say, corporate logos or other frivalous items. Many civil servents do get mightly annoyed with the process and hoops needed to jump through to do their job.

I went to F'bough in 2006, Finmecanicca (and by default- AWhl) had a very nice looking CSAR cabin mockup of a AW101. The rear mounted 7.62/.50 cal folded down from the roof if I recall.

Infact, I remember standing there, waiting for something loud and fast to take off, and a Merlin crept up on everyone around us, no one heard it coming towards us, until someone pointed it when it was landing.
High_lander is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 08:21
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Truro
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is how certain MP's see the troops complaints. Perhaps this low-life should go and trot around a minefield.
The suffering of the troops caught in the minefield and the utter frustration of watching their colleague bleed to death is unimaginable.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770
Bootneck is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 09:24
  #35 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crikey, ballsy move to issue a UTI to remove all the winches from theatre at that time, I bet people kicked and screamed against that...
South Bound is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 10:48
  #36 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Interesting point made by the col medic a few posts up; why don't we have dedicated casevac helos? Not knocking the good work done by the current helos in theatre but surely it would work better for everyone if we had a couple of medivac cabs on 24hr stby, fully kitted out and ready to go? That would free up the heavy lift to concentrate on the ops stuff.

I suppose such a request/idea would go in the same MoD tray as the requests for a battalion of sharks with frickin laser beams on their heads. Much further down the list than the MoD request for £1000 office chairs blah blah blah.....

Just a thought.
StopStart is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 12:00
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
You mean to say you still haven't received those sharks yet, Stoppers?
BEagle is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.