AH-64 Hourly Flying Cost
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
AH-64 Hourly Flying Cost
I thought the AAC was supposed to be able to do things cheaper than the RAF.... 
Defence of the Realm
In response to questions raised by the redoubtable Ann Winterton MP, on the costs of operating military aircraft, we have received from the MoD figures which are truly mind-blowing.
Lady Winterton asked for the hourly operating cost including crew time of the Nimrod MR2, the Chinook, the Apache attack helicopter (operated by the Army Air Corps) and the Tornado GR4 aircraft. (Link to follow).
The reply from defence minister Bob Ainsworth, was that the total cost per funded flying hour for the Nimrod was £30,000 per hour, the Tornado £33,000 and the Chinook a relatively modest (by comparison) £24,000. But the absolute mind-blowing figure is the Apache which costs out at a staggering £46,000 per hour.......
Defence of the Realm
In response to questions raised by the redoubtable Ann Winterton MP, on the costs of operating military aircraft, we have received from the MoD figures which are truly mind-blowing.
Lady Winterton asked for the hourly operating cost including crew time of the Nimrod MR2, the Chinook, the Apache attack helicopter (operated by the Army Air Corps) and the Tornado GR4 aircraft. (Link to follow).
The reply from defence minister Bob Ainsworth, was that the total cost per funded flying hour for the Nimrod was £30,000 per hour, the Tornado £33,000 and the Chinook a relatively modest (by comparison) £24,000. But the absolute mind-blowing figure is the Apache which costs out at a staggering £46,000 per hour.......
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The people who do the costing do not use a level playing field.
Some aircraft get the cost of the airbase and all its facilities factored into the equation under the ludicrous theory that it would not be there if not for the aircraft, and some do not.
Just look at the cost of the Navy Jetstreams for example relative to the cost of the dominies and 146 etc!
Some aircraft get the cost of the airbase and all its facilities factored into the equation under the ludicrous theory that it would not be there if not for the aircraft, and some do not.
Just look at the cost of the Navy Jetstreams for example relative to the cost of the dominies and 146 etc!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mornington Crescent
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I understand it, from having had the (dis)pleasure of selling into wider markets 
, the quoted hourly cost of the aircraft in these cases include everything from fuel and oils through to the aircrew's time, self-insurance costs (a whole different problem!) and even the depreciation on the asset!
It's quite a big area to work out the actual hourly cost and I never enjoyed doing it!
, the quoted hourly cost of the aircraft in these cases include everything from fuel and oils through to the aircrew's time, self-insurance costs (a whole different problem!) and even the depreciation on the asset!It's quite a big area to work out the actual hourly cost and I never enjoyed doing it!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes
on
16 Posts
Why does it come as any surprise that an experienced air force can operate complex modern aircraft cheaper than a comparitively inexperienced smaller flying branch?
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Pprune does not like blog$pot.com (why?) so here is the link to ORAC's source: http://tinyurl.com/37y4k2
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
THS
Please let's not turn this thread into yet another inter-Service 'banter' competition.
As Blunt M8 and Tourist point out between them, the figures presented are frequently dependant on which poor sod has been asked to work them out. A few years ago, I was asked to work out how much it cost the RAF to provide one hour's worth of control, but what looked like a relatively simple task was actually a nightmare to get into and I ended up providing about 6 different answers depending what was factored-in to the overall cost.
ISTR the estimates being pushed back up the chain and whoever wanted the info would simply have selected the answer required, but presented it in the context of what was factored-in. The point I am getting round to is that these figures are meaningless unless we know what is and isn't included.
STH
Please let's not turn this thread into yet another inter-Service 'banter' competition.
As Blunt M8 and Tourist point out between them, the figures presented are frequently dependant on which poor sod has been asked to work them out. A few years ago, I was asked to work out how much it cost the RAF to provide one hour's worth of control, but what looked like a relatively simple task was actually a nightmare to get into and I ended up providing about 6 different answers depending what was factored-in to the overall cost.
ISTR the estimates being pushed back up the chain and whoever wanted the info would simply have selected the answer required, but presented it in the context of what was factored-in. The point I am getting round to is that these figures are meaningless unless we know what is and isn't included.
STH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
If the cost per hour is based on total support costs i.e. the support cost is there as a constant, then surely the more hours flown will become more cost effective with only maintenance and fuel being the actual cost. If you buy a new car, tax, insure and garage it, then use it only twice a year, cost per mile is more than using it every day'
Or is that an over simplification?
Or is that an over simplification?
Let's put this into perspective. If you think that the cost of Apache is expensive, what would be the current cost of not having them?
I'm sure that 3 PARA, 2 Mercian, The Royal Anglians and the Royal Marines would be only too pleased to tell you. Let's not forget what they were purchased for in the first place - whether or not it was envisaged that their usage would be so high or so effective.
I'm sure that 3 PARA, 2 Mercian, The Royal Anglians and the Royal Marines would be only too pleased to tell you. Let's not forget what they were purchased for in the first place - whether or not it was envisaged that their usage would be so high or so effective.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Uganda
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Guys , just to put it into context , the rough hourly cost of running a civ B747-400 is in the region of £10,000 per flying hour , at current exchange rates of course , this includes maint , crew etc... everything. It is based on an aircraft approx 8 to 12 years old and flying 350 to 400 hours per month , less hours the hourly cost would increase , maybe the high cost of military aircraft is low flying hours?
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
If a 744 costs £10k/hr, then a highly bespoke single-purpose machine at £45k an hour isn't so expensive IMHO.
However, this entire debate is meaningless. The AH64 program costs £x. Not £y per use. I'm sure AS90 costs a damn sight less per round, and surely for £46k one could have rather a lot of AS90 rounds on the ground. But then it wouldn't be doing the same job. For £46k, one could have a truckload of grenades, but not doing the same job.
If the country is fighting two wars simultaneously, and failing to learn the lessons of history (see Nazi Germany for a good pointer), one of which is in a country where we got our arses kicked despite having infintely superior kit, and where the Russians got their arses kicked despite having an entire army on task, then least we can do is pay for it!!!!
Edited to add: Or rather, the least YOU can do is pay for it, since my taxes go to Uncle Sam these days, and that's a whole different issue.
However, this entire debate is meaningless. The AH64 program costs £x. Not £y per use. I'm sure AS90 costs a damn sight less per round, and surely for £46k one could have rather a lot of AS90 rounds on the ground. But then it wouldn't be doing the same job. For £46k, one could have a truckload of grenades, but not doing the same job.
If the country is fighting two wars simultaneously, and failing to learn the lessons of history (see Nazi Germany for a good pointer), one of which is in a country where we got our arses kicked despite having infintely superior kit, and where the Russians got their arses kicked despite having an entire army on task, then least we can do is pay for it!!!!
Edited to add: Or rather, the least YOU can do is pay for it, since my taxes go to Uncle Sam these days, and that's a whole different issue.
Over 1000 posts and I bought this Personal Title to try and tell my mother the embarrassing news that I am a closet Jazz fan.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Manchester
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure the flying hour cost is any fault of the AACs. The Apache is supposed to be in a league of its own in terms of maintenance required.
Capable aircraft but bloody expensive to operate.
Capable aircraft but bloody expensive to operate.
I wonder if they have also taken into consideration the wear and tear on the various weapon systems and other rotatables that are being consumed at a far greater rate than expected?
THS, why go down that line, its b******s and you know it.
THS, why go down that line, its b******s and you know it.
...............and, of course, expensive or not, it's the only tool left in the cupboard capable of doing the job. What else do we have available that could be deployed in it's place??? 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 58
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
STOP
Surprisingly, the figures are wrong and not as note worthy as you all have made out.
The real question is - is the cost of flying a Tornado, Apache, Herc, Lynx, Typhoon, Harrier, Gazelle, Tocanno, Squirrel, Merlin, Chinook or even black hawk worth it when it saves one of your lives?
I suggest it is and that is the true mark of value?
Here endeth the thread!!!!!
The real question is - is the cost of flying a Tornado, Apache, Herc, Lynx, Typhoon, Harrier, Gazelle, Tocanno, Squirrel, Merlin, Chinook or even black hawk worth it when it saves one of your lives?
I suggest it is and that is the true mark of value?
Here endeth the thread!!!!!
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wrote:
Then Gnd wrote:
How very very dare you ... 
STH
The point I am getting round to is that these figures are meaningless unless we know what is and isn't included.
Surprisingly, the figures are wrong and not as note worthy as you all have made out.
STH