Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Air Eng rumour control?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Air Eng rumour control?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Nov 2007, 19:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sunny Wilts!
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air Eng rumour control?

Hello Ladies & Gentlemen,

The grapevine has it that at a secret Wilts airbase there is consideration being given to putting GE's in the Air Engineers seat because of a severe lack of Air Engineers in the system? (Harks back to a few years ago doesn't it)

Can anybody cast any light on this or is it just another rumour? Either way a curious situation we find ourselves in.
cheesedoff is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2007, 22:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: As close to beer as humanly possible
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GE Flight Engineers!

That will never work. How the hell could the GE's then complain about the f***ing aircrew!

(And yes I know they have AT's on the E3!)
Donna K Babbs is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 05:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AIDU,

This must be close to a record......... completely off thread and developed into a slagging match by the second reply!

It does seem though that something needs to be done about the Air Eng situation. Waddington and Kinloss as well as Lyneham will need them for many more years.

For what it is worth, the ATs on E-3 are not, never have been, and never will be aircraft GEs.

Y_G
Yeller_Gait is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 05:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ooop north
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This raised its head years ago. I think it was put to bed by the fact? that it is illegal to have flight deck crewmembers who havent passed an approved course of training. And as of 2 years ago, the RAF has no approved course of training for engineers. PMA wanted to post a rotary crewman straight onto an E-3 OCU, I think that one died a death. IF there is a problem with numbers, it is down to poor planning when they decided to kill the eng course, and poor management by peeing off those who were in the trade and have now left or are leaving.
bwfg3 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 07:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mornin bwfg3 or should I say afternoon where you are?
There is indeed a legal issue with the placing of non qualified personnel into a Flt Deck crew seat. All crew must have completed a recognized/approved course of flying training and hold the appropriate license or military "Q" prior to being able to attend a type rating cse/OCU. Imagine BA taking ints GEs and putting them onto a type rating course without first being qualified to fly? JAA/ICAO would be very interested to hear about that one. As would the passengers/peeps down the back?
As bwfg3 states, this particular situation stems for the gross mis-management of the Air Engineer Cadre. It didn't take the brains of an Arch Bishop to realise that stopping Air Eng Trg "BEFORE" the older fleets replacements were introduced, was doomed to be a huge mistake and a pure cost cutting and career enhancing measure for someone. When has the service ever brought a new aircraft type into service on time? Let alone several types, A400/FSTA/MRA4(Nimrod 2000) None of which have entered service on time or are likely to do so. We all know that these things slip to the right, they always do.
That doesn't mean that these fleets won't enter service at some point and indeed the Air Eng will eventually be phased out however, in the mean time we are left trying to find a suitable way forward in order to ensure that aircraft can be suitably manned by qualified and competent aircrew.
I suggest that we ignore the red faces of the policy makers and re start Air Eng Trg at Cranwell on the back of the new modular course. All the Air Eng lessons have been archived and and issues like the AEPT are not unresolvable.
Let's stop crisis managing this and throw e.g. these GEs through a proper course. The service has a competency problem at the moment on some fleets and the last thing we need is for a crew seat to be filled by a "switch flicker" who is unable to cross check and complement the other flight deck members.
Ginge
Ginger Beer is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 07:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Turks and Cacos
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cheesedoff
Hello Ladies & Gentlemen,

The grapevine has it that at a secret Wilts airbase there is consideration being given to putting GE's in the Air Engineers seat because of a severe lack of Air Engineers in the system? (Harks back to a few years ago doesn't it)

Can anybody cast any light on this or is it just another rumour? Either way a curious situation we find ourselves in.
What a load of rubbish.
I have no idea where you got this little chestnut from.
On_The_Top_Bunk is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 11:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 261
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Nice rumour to start .... but misses one extremely salient point ....

The GE's section is nearly as badly undermanned as the Air Eng sections ..

so just where do these "new" bodies suddenly appear from ??

OmegaV6 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 11:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dust off the cobwebs, get rid of the niff-naff that drove us out and bring back the "old and bold". I could do "circuits and bumps" as a job for my latter years, beats the office (although the "view's" better) - let you serving guys go to the Ops and use your UK time for family, not ticking boxes.
Ships-Cat is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 14:21
  #9 (permalink)  

Inter Arma Enim Silentius Lex Legis
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love this....

The wheel on the train goes round and round... round and round round and round!!

The Gorilla is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 16:46
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they were to match my current take home pay and terms I might dust off my logbook and come back....................ha ha ha ha

Sorry, too many GnTs tonight!
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 17:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: WILTS
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well they are obviously so short at the secret air base that they are posting people out to other types, we are getting 4 from the multi engine transport aircraft with cavernous hold. And I do believe at least 1 has gone north and at least 1 to the flying dishplate
So!!!
rumour control way off me thinks!
14greens is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 17:16
  #12 (permalink)  

Inter Arma Enim Silentius Lex Legis
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hoppy
How goes it?

If they offered to double what I am taking home now I wouldn't go back!!

Hee Hee, rumour control you can't beat it!
The Gorilla is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 18:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 594
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Hi Hoppy......not even a first class ticket back would drag me back from here......however would consider the NZ Airforce for a couple of years though......nah that would mean having to get me hair cut!!!!!
Seriously though we saw this coming years ago as someone has already mentioned.....Just how many guys are left in the trade should have lost the leaving in droves mentality now that the flying jobs outside have fallen by however Hoppy and a few othershave found well paid ground inst jobs out there and good on them.
fergineer is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 18:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah, but in the good old days engine fitters used to fly on heavy aircraft when the number of engines rose above the number of hands the pilot had. The trouble was that they were losing too many skilled and valued groundcrew on operations. The solution was to invent the air engineer. Not for me to debate the relative worth of engine fitters and air engineers!
gjh613 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 20:42
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well done F***y you to$$er. Keep looking after your loady mates and ignore the branch that needs your attention the most.
Hoop Stress is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 20:49
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry, i have deleted my rage-driven blunder

Steve Anderson (if that helps)
Hoop Stress is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 20:54
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it's fair to say that all branches of the NCA cadre are suffering. While it is probably true that the Eng branch are at point critique through lack of foresight, the question is does PMA manage any of our careers?
ChockIce is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 21:08
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South West
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OmegaV6

Obviously you get the loadie to do the GE's job, rope in a random mover to replace the loadie, and if you're also short of SVCs, stick a couple of pax in the doors as spotters and get the last one onboard to bring the chocks in with them!

N Joe
N Joe is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 21:32
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 261
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
OmegaV6

Obviously you get the loadie to do the GE's job, rope in a random mover to replace the loadie, and if you're also short of SVCs, stick a couple of pax in the doors as spotters and get the last one onboard to bring the chocks in with them!

N Joe
Okies NJ .. your point is accepted ... promotion to

a) OC Base Support Flt
b) OC Force Headquarters
c) OC C4I

whichever you choose, as you probably actually know what they mean/do (please tell me... I still haven't worked out what they are !! )

and if you find an "Eng Ldr" hiding... you win a flight in a Herc ... if we ever find a serviceable one and a crew to man it ....

OmegaV6 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 21:50
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South West
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OV6

a) Is tht a real flt?
b) Wrong branch!
c) Do I look like a mobile phone salesman?!?!?!?!?

All I know is OC C4I doesn't actually have any "I" and most of his mail still goes to Coltishall - where OC 41 Sqn's post box used to be!

Had enough flights in hercs, but thanks for the offer.

N Joe
N Joe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.