Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

A400M on its wheels

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

A400M on its wheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Dec 2007, 20:55
  #61 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Given that it may only carry one line of pallets, I presume it can carry non-palleted (long/outsize) stuff as well? ie strapped to the floor? Yes, I understand the handling probs therein, but I'm sure I've seen lots of odd shaped things lurking down the back of C-17's. Surely it's not just pallets or bust, is it?
 
Old 17th Dec 2007, 21:00
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,823
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Is it just me, or does that helicopter look rather happy at being snuggled up inside an A400M:

BEagle is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 22:14
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it just me, or does that helicopter look rather happy at being snuggled up inside an A400M:
Maybe not a happy but hungry Puma ?

keesje is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 08:15
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 113
Received 26 Likes on 6 Posts
I agree that you can move all sorts of loose loaded kit if you have to but movement on a pallet that is the best way to to reduce damage and to speed loading/unloading. Different sized pallets may be a compromise if you are willing to end up with non standard loads that would not easily tranship to other aircraft types and accept that there would be dual airportability standards for equipment. As for C17 only carrying large bulky loads my impression is that on most occasions they are fitted to carry pallets because what needs to be moved is everyday stuff that keeps armies going not tanks and helicopters. As I said they missed a trick with the A400 and it is a pity.
bspatz is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 08:42
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Name for the A400M

What is this beast going to be called when it enters service?
Samson? Mammoth? Titanic!!!
Cannonfodder is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 08:54
  #66 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Airtruck?

Sorry
 
Old 18th Dec 2007, 09:18
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Portsmouth
Age: 43
Posts: 481
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A400 Keith?
c-bert is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 09:27
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 113
Received 26 Likes on 6 Posts
....airtruck!
bspatz is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 09:55
  #69 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Can anyone hear an echo in here?
 
Old 18th Dec 2007, 10:27
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,823
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
I hear it will be called 'Loadmaster'.....

I prefered 'Bristol Bureaucrat'!!
BEagle is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 11:06
  #71 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Keith gets my vote
Navaleye is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 12:03
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,071
Received 187 Likes on 71 Posts
We have had a long time to think about this, and I fear will have plenty of time yet, but keith is my choice.

If sales to the US are anticipated, the 'haulasseriser' may be better.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 13:21
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I may have missed the post (or point) about what i am going to say but have Brize Norton actually got the ramp space for these A400M "GlobeTrotters" and the C-130J's?
Looking on google at the available space, where exactly will the Lyneham lads and the A400M fit in? I suppose there is room if they take all those Caravans away to the scrap man () on the western side of the airfield and perhaps on the disused runway/taxiway if they widen the area up near the C-17A's?
Be interesting to see where they will indeed fit. I see there is just enough space for the 6 C-17s and the A330's (if/when we get them) but apart from the areas stated above i can't see much more where the Hercs/A400M's will actually 'go'.
A 'swap' to Fairford might do the trick! (as if!)
Razor61 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 13:32
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,823
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Their Airships will be quick to tell you that they expect most of the aeroplanes to be deployed for most of the time.....

So no need for them all to have parking slots, it seems.

The whole waterfront is being dug up and relaid to accommodate the folly of moving the C130s from Lyneham.

No-one has actually worked out yet where all the 'Superbase' personel will live, let alone park their cars when at work.

'tis all bolleaux....
BEagle is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 13:39
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most of them will be spending their time at Manchester or Birmingham in the foggy periods anyway....or when the Runway goes black... (!)
One Runway for what... 66+ Transport and Tanker aircraft? Great fun.
Razor61 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 14:45
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GONE BY 2012
Age: 51
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never mind the one runway!!!

What about Sqn buildings, hangarage, mess rooms and kitchens, families housing, car parking, school places etc etc.

Not just for the C130Js but 47 AD, TMW and the host of other lodger units.

First C130J due to go in 2010 to Bzn??????
Truckkie is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 14:58
  #77 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
The Google Earth image makes Brize look quite busy. 6 Tristars (!), VC-10s. Even and Antonov. But by the time Keith gets here they will all be on the scrapyard.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2007, 16:18
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't see an Antonov, maybe an Il-76 though

But yes, 1 Runway, no hangars, no hard stands/rampage areas, no housing, no nothing, piss poor thinking...as usual.
Razor61 is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2007, 12:31
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GONE BY 2012
Age: 51
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Space is tight at BZN without including any C130Ks which are due out of service in 2012 but which are now rumoured to be part of the new superbase plan.

Is this anything to do with Airbus's recent problems and the delays and possible cancellation of the A400M???
Truckkie is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2008, 10:40
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some recent images on a press release here

http://www.airbusmilitary.com/press.html
TEEEJ is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.