A400M on its wheels
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lincs
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my experience (and I have several years of working with Mod PE, DLO, DPA, etc etc) it is penny pinching, goal post changing and general interfering from non experts on 2/3 year tick in the box tours within the Mod that result in delayed, over budget and inferior products.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Wales
Age: 63
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea you are probably right.
Mind you my defence is that I was posted in with no choice and the word “working” was not a true word……..I attended for several years
Mind you my defence is that I was posted in with no choice and the word “working” was not a true word……..I attended for several years
'Back when' the A400M was still the 'FLA', I wound them up at Farnborough by saying that 'FLA' actually just stood for 'Funny Looking Albert'...
Whereas C-130J was J for 'Just another Herk' - or 'J for Joke' as it certainly was at the time when Lockheed Martin was having all the problems. Though it isn't nowadays, of course, as we all know.
The TPA400 needed beefing up in certain areas, I understand. But delivered the beans pretty well.
It must have a very clever engine/prop computer to have a single lever idle-max, 0/0 to M0.72/FL370 range to sort out!
Whereas C-130J was J for 'Just another Herk' - or 'J for Joke' as it certainly was at the time when Lockheed Martin was having all the problems. Though it isn't nowadays, of course, as we all know.
The TPA400 needed beefing up in certain areas, I understand. But delivered the beans pretty well.
It must have a very clever engine/prop computer to have a single lever idle-max, 0/0 to M0.72/FL370 range to sort out!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: middleofnowhere
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I heard they started designing the aircraft as per the requirement list.....
Heated seats, check
Rapid boil water heater, check
gucci glass cockpit, check
wings......... sorry, we've run out of money
(any C130 wings kicking around in stores we could use, or have they been leaned?)
Heated seats, check
Rapid boil water heater, check
gucci glass cockpit, check
wings......... sorry, we've run out of money
(any C130 wings kicking around in stores we could use, or have they been leaned?)
Airbus' intention is for 85 days maintenance over 12 years for the A400M.
Can the C17 or C130J match that?
It may be a pipe dream at the moment but I imagine that they will get pretty close to it. The hours flown will be nothing like a civil airline operator and some Airbus' are doing two years between C Checks.
If they can achieve that then the running costs will be quite favourable.
Can the C17 or C130J match that?
It may be a pipe dream at the moment but I imagine that they will get pretty close to it. The hours flown will be nothing like a civil airline operator and some Airbus' are doing two years between C Checks.
If they can achieve that then the running costs will be quite favourable.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N51 09".94 W001 45".51
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Civvy flying hours is one thing tactical AT is another ! Do those 85 days include battle damage repair or recovery after rough strip ops ? How many hours at low level or airdropping ?
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suppose I have to declare that I am an A400M sceptic. I am unconvinced by claims for performance and servicability for an aircraft that has yet to have its wings attached and relies on unproven engines to provide more than twice the power of any existing western turpboprop. Granted the computer graphics look very realistic, but so did the Millenium Falcan in Star Wars! At Euro 100 million a piece they don't compare well with the C-17 ($200 millionish each for the Aussies) which can deliver substantially greater range, speed and 3-4 times the loads in a proven aircraft.
Unfortunately we are locked into a programme for 25 of these white elephants so the money is gone.
As for keeping the European aircraft industry alive, I thought we were trying to keep the British soldier alive and properly supplied in a far foriegn field. He is still waiting and will do for some time yet. I wager there will be more Vulcans flying in 2010 than A400Ms! This farce would be funny if the ramifacations weren't so deadly serious.
Unfortunately we are locked into a programme for 25 of these white elephants so the money is gone.
As for keeping the European aircraft industry alive, I thought we were trying to keep the British soldier alive and properly supplied in a far foriegn field. He is still waiting and will do for some time yet. I wager there will be more Vulcans flying in 2010 than A400Ms! This farce would be funny if the ramifacations weren't so deadly serious.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Meg..do the numbers for any useful route leg, say UK to 'Stan. Thats when I bet the C-17 will pull the big lead in load carrying. Anyway, as I said, A400M performance figures are fantasy UNTIL IT GETS OFF THE GROUND.
Greeny..check out the Marshalls web site, Snoopy's still in bits in the latest pics. Maybe their PR people just havn't got around to photographing the wonderous sight of that big fan on an Albert.
Greeny..check out the Marshalls web site, Snoopy's still in bits in the latest pics. Maybe their PR people just havn't got around to photographing the wonderous sight of that big fan on an Albert.
How 'bout a honkin big rotor mast instead of the wing? Would look a lot like those Russian heavy lift helicopters if it did. Where's all those photoshop guru's when you need them?
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Meg..Lets say we put 20 tonnes in an A400M and 40 tonnes in a C-17. As the C-17 has longer legs it can carry its 40 tonnes further. At some stage the A400M will have to swap load for fuel to keep up. I would imagine that at a certain range the C-17 still carries 40 tonnes while the Super Albert can only cope with 10. Remember, the A400Ms range figures are only good if it can climb to its optimum altitude. Unfortunately it will be too slow and restricted, like the J, to a lower less efficiant level.
Just my guess, but we all know that stated max loads are only good for limited range. We are clearly not getting a strategic airlifter on par with the C-17, however, I don't think (even if/when it flies) that the A400M represents a value for money airlift solution for our deployed forces.
I do hope that I will be proved wrong, cos there's no going back and I suspect there's no money left for plan B!
Just my guess, but we all know that stated max loads are only good for limited range. We are clearly not getting a strategic airlifter on par with the C-17, however, I don't think (even if/when it flies) that the A400M represents a value for money airlift solution for our deployed forces.
I do hope that I will be proved wrong, cos there's no going back and I suspect there's no money left for plan B!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,108
Received 2,953 Likes
on
1,259 Posts
I seem to remember the TSR2 was on its wheels too, as indeed was the Canadair Arrow, or am i just being cynical in my old age 
Perhaps that's all you get for the planned budget.......... wings, engines and all the other bits come on the options list
BUT they should be commended with the forethought and presence of mind to produce an aircraft with a greater payload than the ubiquitous Hecules...
Oh wait a moment, where have I seen one of those before?
Perhaps that's all you get for the planned budget.......... wings, engines and all the other bits come on the options list
BUT they should be commended with the forethought and presence of mind to produce an aircraft with a greater payload than the ubiquitous Hecules...
Oh wait a moment, where have I seen one of those before?
Europrop International delivers first TP400 engine for Airbus Military A400M
The wonderous new all powerful engine cant be fitted to snoopy until it has stopped blowing up gearboxes on the test bed !
Flight article
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hunched over a keyboard
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nit-picking aside,remember the sceptics saying the A380/MR4/Vulcan would never fly? Do you own a rose bush which could donate some buttock-jewelry?
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ball gazing
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, & how many aero-med litter positions can the A400M carry compared with the C17?
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glowcesestershiiiire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ta - I didn't know the figure.
)Thankfully, the C-17 (in my short experience) carries no more than a handful of litter patients at one time. Most of the 100/month mentioned I'm guessing are seated. The 'my jet carries more than your jet' pi$$ing contest is therefore largely irrelevant here but I guess the nights are drawing in.