Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

B1 At Fairford

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th October 2007 | 15:43
  #21 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: Europe
You'd have thought that with only 3 engines, i.e. only 1 engine operative on the starboard side, there was an unacceptable risk of unsymmetrical thrust if the remaining starboard engine should have a problem on take-off (and the chances of a problem with any given engine are not improbable).

Does this tell us then that a B1 can easily cope with only two engines on take off at a certain TOW, and furthermore it doesn't even matter if they are both at the same side?

I suppose you could argue that the Air France Concorde ended up with pretty much only two engines at full power on the same side, and may have survived if the TOW had been less (i.e. not fully loaded fuel & Pax) & they'd got the gear up (may have some of these facts slighty wrong from memory, but you get the line of thought).
JFZ90 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2007 | 20:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Middle England
Is it still at Fairford? I live 2miles NW of the base and was awoken at exactly 0400 UTC on 5 Oct by an almighty noise as something large with lots (or perhaps 75% of lots) of thrust got airborne. It was a beautifully clear and still night. I saw the lights disappearing due west but could hear the noise for at least 5 minutes! My wife complained - but there again...
FKCX is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2007 | 21:42
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
From: Devon, England
It wasn't the B-1B because it only arrived Saturday around noon (6th).
It was probably a VC-10!

It seems B-1Bs have a habit of fires in sandy places... heres a pic of one in the Gulf War
http://www.b1b.wpafb.af.mil/images/gallery/b1_fire.jpg

Last edited by Razor61; 7th October 2007 at 22:13.
Razor61 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th October 2007 | 08:30
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 203
Likes: 1
From: Ruislip Middlesex,England
Just a thought on this....Isn't Fairford one of the USAF,s designated airfields for "all things" strategic with regard to the operation of B1,B2,B52s etc.
Therefore, would it not be probable that the B1 will stay here for the appropriate repairs?.....I seem to remember a similar situation with a B52,during the second Gulf war, where an engine pylon suffered "ground damage" and the a/c was repaired on site.
CHINOOKER is offline  
Reply
Old 8th October 2007 | 10:22
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: In the Doghouse...
I live 2miles NW of the base and was awoken at exactly 0400 UTC on 5 Oct by an almighty noise as something large with lots (or perhaps 75% of lots) of thrust got airborne.
Twas a lovely U-2...left before dawn...
tonyosborne is offline  
Reply
Old 8th October 2007 | 10:29
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Lincs
I remember seeing one catch fire on start up at Thumrait during the Afg push. Never seen so many people run away from an aircraft so fast!! mind, it was fully loaded with JDAMS and other goodies for OBL!!
The Swinging Monkey is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2007 | 23:28
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Manchester.UK
So has anybody actually ascertained as to why this 3 engined beast graced this green and pleasant land?
Pontious is offline  
Reply
Old 12th October 2007 | 01:52
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: No one's home...
More likely there are some charts that show how much runway you need for a 2 engine takeoff and for a 3 engine. As for loss of control, you don't come in with the third engine until you have sufficient rudder and you feed it in as speed increases. We had 2 engine ferries on the 727 and although we didn't do it in the airplane when I was a sim instructor, we had some very good drivers who did their last sim checks all SINGLE ENGINE in the 737-300. Takeoff and all approaches and misses with one engine.
wileydog3 is offline  
Reply
Old 27th October 2007 | 19:00
  #29 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 14
From: Lincs
http://www.afmc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123073557

Bomber rescue: AFMC helps return damaged B-1B to friendly environment
TEEEJ is offline  
Reply
Old 27th October 2007 | 20:23
  #30 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Interesting. Looks like they looked at the consequences in some depth, inc advice from Edwards. Risks must have increased by some degree - I wonder by how much? They obviously made a judgement that the risks were tolerable.

Can you see Boscombe ever having allowed something similar?
JFZ90 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2007 | 00:17
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 101
Likes: 4
From: Odiham
Might be from the Stan actually

Just before i came back in Sept 07 from Kandahar a B1 had to make a diversion with a serious engine fire.
The word was they would not be able to repair it for a LONG time. So maybe they decided to fly it with authorisation to the nearest place where such repairs could be carried out????
wokawoka is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2007 | 17:51
  #32 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 556
Likes: 53
I believe ETOPs doesn't apply to MIL a/c.
rab-k is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2007 | 10:17
  #33 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 556
Likes: 53
Thank you CBA. My post was in response to Post#20
rab-k is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 14:08
  #34 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 15
From: Gibraltar
The story.

Here.
Navaleye is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.