Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Blue afterburner?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Blue afterburner?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Sep 2007, 18:53
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The RB199 was, I thought, the first engine to double its thrust when in reheat.

However, MTU are showing 41Kn to 72Kn Max Dry to Reheat, quite propulsively useful I'd say
kokpit is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2007, 19:30
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shrops
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The propulsive usefulness of reheat (as a measure of the increase in thrust gained through its use) is a function of the change in temperature that is achieved between the dry value and the wet value, not the amount of flame coming out of the exhaust
splitbrain is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2007, 19:36
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Of course reheat increases thrust...

What I'm talking about is the fuel that's being burned outside the engine, which is presumably not doing much.

Phil
Phil_R is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2007, 19:54
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shrops
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fuel is actually being burned at the reheat manifold. It is the velocity of the exhaust gases that carries the flame outside of the propelling nozzle. Yes, it would probably be more efficient (in terms of heat transfer) to retain the flame inside the exhaust system, but I'm not sure its possible simply because of the way the system has to work.
splitbrain is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2007, 20:04
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: north
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's well known that reheat isn't an efficient means of developing thrust. Around 10 times the fuel flow to double the thrust. Handy when required though.
L Peacock is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2007, 20:05
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And why do we see the 'dancing Diamonds' i think they are called, is that a photo or video effect.
BigEndBob is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2007, 20:07
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South West
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More Geek Speak

PR does have a point. Most FJ aircraft just have convergent nozzles meaning much of the expansion energy is wasted outside the engine. It would be most efficient to have a large convergent-divergent nozzle (like the main engine nozzles on the back of the shuttle) which would capture the thrust generated by the full expansion of the exhaust gases behind the aircraft. However, the drag and weight would be excessive when not in reheat (90%+ of the time). Latest generation FJ engines have (variable) con-di nozzles but even then, the limited diameter means that they still can't recover all of the expansion energy.

N Joe
N Joe is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2007, 20:15
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South West
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More geek speak!

The diamonds are due to the shock-waves in the expanding supersonic exhaust flow. Gases at different pressures/temperatures have different refractive indexes so bend the light differently. Same principle as shimmer in air over hot tarmac etc, except that the changes though the shock-waves are much sharper.

N Joe
N Joe is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2007, 20:16
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BigEndBob
And why do we see the 'dancing Diamonds' i think they are called, is that a photo or video effect.
Shock diamonds:

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...on/q0224.shtml
Focks 2 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2007, 20:31
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 745
Received 25 Likes on 8 Posts
To confuse matters, if you watch a Tornado take off during the day it's AB is orange, at night it appears to be blue...
Stitchbitch is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2007, 20:50
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sussex
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or striations.
Synthetic is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 00:05
  #32 (permalink)  
Drain Bamaged
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 56
Posts: 536
Received 34 Likes on 13 Posts


Orange, blue....Blue or orange.

It's all related to Vodka quality.

ehwatezedoing is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 00:48
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
> at night it appears to be blue

Yes. What you're seeing is the blue flame after it's exited the engine and encountered a whole load more oxygen. It's very dim. During the day it's invisible and all you can see is the rich-mixture area inside the, er, whatever you call the adjustable nozzle.

Phil
Phil_R is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 08:26
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Watch an F-15E take off - you can tell if it's an older one with Dash 220 engines (yellow a/b) or a newer one with 229 IPEs (blue a/b).

I'll get my anorak.
Red Snow is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.