Oh really
Thread Starter
Oh really
I'd love to know how they came up with these figures!
Especially amount of time for servicings
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6902214.stm
Must be all true though it's on the BBC
Especially amount of time for servicings
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6902214.stm
Must be all true though it's on the BBC
Last edited by insty66; 17th Jul 2007 at 11:47. Reason: Missing Link!!!
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: in my combat underpants
Age: 53
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The MoD is also working closely with industry to ensure the supply chain works satisfactorily.
The MoD is getting stuffed up the hoop to ensure the supply chain works satisfactorily to paper over the shortcomings of industry.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'Since the end of last year the number of Harrier aircraft fit for action has met the RAF's targets' - RAF target = 18 ac
'Operational maintenance and minor repairs are carried out at squadrons' home bases' - Harrier home base = Kandahar
'The time taken to perform minor maintenance has reduced by 37% for Tornados and 19% for Harriers'. - Because the ac come out post maint with the same reds and greens they went in with.
'Operational maintenance and minor repairs are carried out at squadrons' home bases' - Harrier home base = Kandahar
'The time taken to perform minor maintenance has reduced by 37% for Tornados and 19% for Harriers'. - Because the ac come out post maint with the same reds and greens they went in with.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lynehamshire
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Figures!
Sorry to be so pessimistic....
Almost mirroring the PVR rate within the Blue Suits. Cut me down for my cynisism, but shouldn't we be concentrating on getting the maintenance right, rather than cutting the times down?, or have we managed miraculously to achieve both?
CRpxGood
The time taken to perform minor maintenance has reduced by 37% for Tornados and 19% for Harriers.
CRpxGood
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South West
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's much easier than you would think as dirtygc points out. Much of the "Minor" time is often taken up with mods or rectifying Lims/ADFs. Simply re-jig your accounting to show that the maintenance only takes, say, 70% of the period, and announce it as a 30% saving!
Also, get rid of OC Eng, and bring in OC Fwd who can't Extend/Defer work to the Minor as it is outside his scope of responsibilty (now belonging to OC Depth). Results in more work at 1st line (old speak I know) but has anyone seen limits on SEngO's overtime budget?
N Joe
Also, get rid of OC Eng, and bring in OC Fwd who can't Extend/Defer work to the Minor as it is outside his scope of responsibilty (now belonging to OC Depth). Results in more work at 1st line (old speak I know) but has anyone seen limits on SEngO's overtime budget?
N Joe
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lynehamshire
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sorry,
Massaging figures with manning is one thing....money safely saved?, but massaging figures where maintenance is concerned worries me significantly ! Not Right!
CRPxGood
Massaging figures with manning is one thing....money safely saved?, but massaging figures where maintenance is concerned worries me significantly ! Not Right!
CRPxGood
Cunning Artificer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In criticising maintenance (not unjustly, I might add) I feel you are missing an important point - the shortage of skilled labour to perform the work. I refer not just to the military, but across the board. As an industry we simply aren't attracting enough recruits - civil or military - and the numbers joining are less than the numbers leaving. The aviation industry in general is suffering because downwards pressure on costs from our accountant masters has reduced salaries, benefits and working conditions. Why, for example would anyone wish to be an avionics technician when they could work less hours in better conditions and for more pay in IT?
For that matter why would anyone wish to be in engineering management? I only stay because I'm too old and set in my ways to change now, but the next time I face the Capital Sanction Committee only to hear the words "No Budget" I'm going to strangle someone.
For that matter why would anyone wish to be in engineering management? I only stay because I'm too old and set in my ways to change now, but the next time I face the Capital Sanction Committee only to hear the words "No Budget" I'm going to strangle someone.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
- the shortage of skilled labour to perform the work. I refer not just to the military, but across the board. As an industry we simply aren't attracting enough recruits - civil or military - and the numbers joining are less than the numbers leaving. The aviation industry in general is suffering because downwards pressure on costs from our accountant masters has reduced salaries, benefits and working conditions.
The latter is now anticipating going to Canada for a technical course.
The RAF offered the former a job as a steward and the RAF Regt turned the other one down. So next time you fly out in a civi helicopter just think who might have serviced your aircraft.
Hmmmmm - if "the shortage of skilled labour to perform the work" means that you only look at the workforce with a Tornado / Harrier 'Q' and ignore anyone else, who despite 22 yrs as a b***dy good rigger, hapens to have a pussy cat background, seves you right.
Didn't even get a response from their agency. Some of the guys who are there have worked for me in the past, and are certainly no better ( if I am feeling generous ) than me. Having had to do indies on their work maybe I'm being very generous.
Still - I'm not bitter - no really! I just think they should look at the bigger picture.
Didn't even get a response from their agency. Some of the guys who are there have worked for me in the past, and are certainly no better ( if I am feeling generous ) than me. Having had to do indies on their work maybe I'm being very generous.
Still - I'm not bitter - no really! I just think they should look at the bigger picture.
All platforms carry out servicings/maintenance in IAW the Master Maintenance Manual (5A1), the Design Authorities carry out reviews on a regular basis using historical data to change item servicing/maintenance frequencies, remove items that had an overhaul life and make them 'on condition', remove items completely, these all reduce the length of the servicings/maintenance. Equally some items that have shown to fail before their Mean Time Before Failure(MTBF) rate, or more frequently than tests showed when manufactured, then these are added to the 5A1. These reductions happen over the life of an aircraft and are not dictated by the customer to make up for manpower shortages. I accept that at a local level if this drop is because local RAF management/IPTs have agreed to extend items of the servicings/maintenance on a regular basis and Lim/ADF them, then this amount of reduction should not be allowed, additionally the civvies have no say over what is, or is not, added to the LIMs/ADFs, this is down to the applicable IPT (civvie contractor can request, but cannot just do it).
For the servicings/maintenance being carried out in Afghanistan and Iraq, this will more likely be due to Contingency Servicing (CTY). Next to some items in the 5A1 there is appended CTY, these equate to the minimum servicing/maintenance requirements while in a war zone and these would, approximately, account for those sort of percentage drops in the times. If the guys are able to do more at any given time they can, like ADFs/Lims/mods/EIs, this reduction has not got anything to do with manpower availability it is all to do with maximising aircraft availablity.
For the servicings/maintenance being carried out in Afghanistan and Iraq, this will more likely be due to Contingency Servicing (CTY). Next to some items in the 5A1 there is appended CTY, these equate to the minimum servicing/maintenance requirements while in a war zone and these would, approximately, account for those sort of percentage drops in the times. If the guys are able to do more at any given time they can, like ADFs/Lims/mods/EIs, this reduction has not got anything to do with manpower availability it is all to do with maximising aircraft availablity.
Last edited by Exrigger; 18th Jul 2007 at 17:25. Reason: Read article properly, amended text accordingly
Thread Starter
anyone think there's any chance of moving work OUT of DARA?
I know how the servicings have been "reduced."
Any work not in the schedule is not counted as time spent servicing, under the old system the time for servicing was from in the door to delivery back to squadron. Now arising faults and ADFs/Lims are not counted as part of the servicing.
Also the level of servicing has been cut! (See exriggers post!) despite the clever maths and stats I find it sobering to think that on jets past their inital design life are now being serviced less than then when they were new!
As for money saving, it's not as if there was any choice when the entire platform's budget was cut by 45% is it.
To the best of my knowledge, not one jet has passed out serviceable on time from CMU from it's inception. I hope if I'm wrong someone can tell me which ones did.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Close to the Arctic Circle
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To the best of my knowledge, not one jet has passed out serviceable on time from CMU from it's inception. I hope if I'm wrong someone can tell me which ones did.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: On the outside looking in
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exrigger,
Have things got that bad or are you surmising? My understanding is that such a "relaxation" wasn't even used in GW1 or 2?
sw
For the servicings/maintenance being carried out in Afghanistan and Iraq, this will more likely be due to Contingency Servicing (CTY). Next to some items in the 5A1 there is appended CTY, these equate to the minimum servicing/maintenance requirements while in a war zone and these would, approximately, account for those sort of percentage drops in the times. If the guys are able to do more at any given time they can, like ADFs/Lims/mods/EIs, this reduction has not got anything to do with manpower availability it is all to do with maximising aircraft availablity.
sw
Safeware:
Not surmising, CTY servicings/maintenance have been around for years, as I said it is in the 5A1 and yes they have been used in GW1 the Chinook detachment flight servicings and maintenance checks where reduced to CTY items shortly after the 17th Jan 91. Conversation with SENGO within days of the 91 Gulf War starting "why are will still doing full flight servicings/maintenance checks, should we not be doing the contingency servicings/maintenance", response "no that is for during war scenarios only", response to that "far be it for me to point out the obvious, but we have been at war since the 17th", reply "oh yes, I will ask advice" or words to that effect, a couple of days later we went to the contingency servicings/maintenance.
I am pretty sure the other deployed RAF aircraft also did the same, as that is its purpose, but others that deployed with those aircraft will have to confirm/deny that as we never came in contact with them.
Have things got that bad or are you surmising? My understanding is that such a "relaxation" wasn't even used in GW1 or 2?
I am pretty sure the other deployed RAF aircraft also did the same, as that is its purpose, but others that deployed with those aircraft will have to confirm/deny that as we never came in contact with them.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Norfolk UK
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JagRigger wrote:
Some of the guys who are there have worked for me in the past, and are certainly no better ( if I am feeling generous ) than me. Having had to do indies on their work maybe I'm being very generous.
Some of the guys who are there have worked for me in the past, and are certainly no better ( if I am feeling generous ) than me. Having had to do indies on their work maybe I'm being very generous.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exrigger: While you are totally correct about the existence of CTY servicings, you are totally wrong about their use in the 'stan by the leaping heaps - there has been no official relaxation of maintenance standards for the deployed ac. Incidentally, whilst chinook may have used CTY in GW1, Tornado certainly didn't in either GW1 or 2!
N Joe & dirty Gc have hit the nail on the head, the ac comes out with the same Lims/ADFs that it entered, the chance to rectify these faults is not taken lest it delay the pulse and thus cost the Service money......so the already stretched first line techies get the pain.
N Joe & dirty Gc have hit the nail on the head, the ac comes out with the same Lims/ADFs that it entered, the chance to rectify these faults is not taken lest it delay the pulse and thus cost the Service money......so the already stretched first line techies get the pain.
Once A Brat, thanks for the clarification: My initial post was partly in answer to dirtygc when he mentioned Harriers home base = khandahar, I did make an assumption when I mentioned Afghanistan and Iraq, in my second post I did say that someone from the other platforms would have to confirm/deny the use of CTY on them. From your post it would seem that others did not utilise CTY servicings/maintenance in other war zones/platforms, I wonder why not as this is supposed to remove the over servicing/maintenance elements that we historically do in peace time.