Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Tanker PFI announced...after many years.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Tanker PFI announced...after many years.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Oct 2007, 17:53
  #121 (permalink)  

Pilot Officer PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I guess Adam Ingram's promise to me a couple of years ago (in the Falklands) of getting a new jet is going to be delayed AGAIN!!!!!! (Not that I believed him then)

What with this and the cuts coming....

Tonks
Tonkenna is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2007, 18:26
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Pass-A-Frozo, mate, I can well believe you!

But if you want to see a really good AAR Mission Planning System, which plans/manages both Towline and Trail Missions, you should come and see what we've been developing for the A310MRTT!

As for FSTA....well, quelle effing surpris! The bolleaux of PFI is coming home to roost at last, it would seem.

So, Greedy Gordon, get your hand in your sporran and come up with the readies!
BEagle is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2007, 07:46
  #123 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beags

I'm with you. No surprise here, just shaking my head in disappointment. Hope the boys and girls on the Project Team at Abbey Wood are thinking of miraculous ways to rescue this one (more likely over a latte), but don't see a way out without a major cash injection from treasury...


SB
South Bound is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2007, 18:58
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post FSTA, PSBR, Golden Rule

Interesting, though not exactly surprising. Remember that the Treasury's problem here is two-fold.

First, that they've not got (the political will to spend) the money on FSTA as a conventional procurement. Solution? Hire it in through PFI, which is cheap now and is off balance sheet. (Let's not tell anyone that it's much pricier in the long term.)
Second, even if the political will existed to do an old-fashioned procurement that meant that we, well, er, bought the aircraft, then they'd have to pay for them on delivery - BEagle can doubtless advise on the delivery schedule. Solution? Borrow the money over the procurement period in the form of government bonds . (Assuming that the government isn't running a surplus, which at the moment it certainly isn't).

Problem: Prudent Gordon's famous golden rule allows the State to borrow only to invest over the economic cycle - fair enough, FSTA qualifies as investment - but crucially, sets debt as a maximum proportion of GDP - not defined but about 40%. They're running into this ceiling, and therefore can't borrow more and thus can't borrow for the jets. Cue PFI, the debt isn't the government's, therefore it doesn't exist.

So, it's the Public Sector Borrowing Requirement (PSBR) and the Golden Rule that are probably scaring the Treasury - hence the mad rush for PFI.

No excuse - Gordon, tell Darling to buy the sodding jets... and whilst he's at it, make it more than 14, there's a good chap.

S41
Squirrel 41 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2007, 18:53
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed... the US Congress axed the KC-767 lease deal, it is well past time for Parliament to do the same with the FSTA PFI scheme.

Buy them!!!
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2007, 22:23
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a thought - When (if) we get this new tanker who is going to maintain it? RAF or Civies - if it’s the RAF then what plans are there to retrain us techies to gain an EASA aircraft licence in order to return the aircraft back to its civilian status.
sumps is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.