Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

How Many Aircraft has the RAF Shot Down since Korea?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

How Many Aircraft has the RAF Shot Down since Korea?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jan 2007, 22:06
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 54
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok. Points taken! Still seems like a waste in hindsight doesn't it?

Like thinking about how much money I've paid out in insurance on my car over the years having never claimed...
glum is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2007, 22:55
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Glum,

Nip out and have a crash mate.

Advo

(Only makes financial sense)
advocatusDIABOLI is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2007, 12:42
  #23 (permalink)  

OLD RED DAMASK
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire born. In Cebu now
Age: 70
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did any Chieftan tank ever fight another tank?
Emphatically YES!
lasernigel is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2007, 12:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swindonshire
Posts: 2,007
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
How many do the Iranians still have, I wonder?
Archimedes is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2007, 12:48
  #25 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Probably about the same as the number of parachute insertions (non-SF) we have done since Suez.
 
Old 4th Jan 2007, 19:29
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by lasernigel
Emphatically YES!

Ok, I'm guessing they were exported ones. Any British Army ones ever used in anger?
Ken Scott is online now  
Old 4th Jan 2007, 20:00
  #27 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Probably about the same as the number of parachute insertions (non-SF) we have done since Suez.
I think we've done more para insertions - don't forget the RAFR drop into Sierra Leone in support of the hooligans.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2007, 20:45
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Several miles SSW of Watford Gap
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or you could add, when did the British Army last fight a combat effective (ie greater than 50% CE) convential opposition?
Answer 1982 (and then only with the help of the RM). Neither of the 2 wars against Iraq count as by the time the Land forces arrived at the scene of the action the opposition land forces had been degraded to non-effective by...
... airpower.

Originally Posted by airborne_artist
I think we've done more para insertions - don't forget the RAFR drop into Sierra Leone in support of the hooligans.
I thing you'll find that was RAF Regt not RAFR - and it was not in support of the Hereford Gun Club but in support of the ongoing IO campaign.
Climebear is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2007, 21:39
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so surface based missiles of the Royal Artillery have destroyed more aircraft in the air than the RAF fighter Sqns?
NURSE is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2007, 10:20
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: England
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here we go again. Light Blue insecurities lead to immature responses to an interesting question

Lighten up chaps, behind the banter most agree that the RAF do a decent job. You don't have to 'prove' it with daft comparisons with tanks, parachutes and whether or not the Pongo's have ever faught a credible opposition.
Arthur's Wizard is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2007, 19:31
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
any opposition are credible whent their rounds are comming over your head!
doesn't matter if its a 6yo with an AK or a highyly trained spetznaz the effect of the round hitting you is still the same.
NURSE is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2007, 20:11
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: (LFA 7a)
Age: 64
Posts: 738
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
...and don't forget the dozens of Jindervik's lying on the bottom in Cardigan Bay!!!!

"oops, I've splashed the playmate" was a pretty regular call in these parts up until recently
jimgriff is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2007, 22:12
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Arthur's Wizard
Here we go again. Light Blue insecurities lead to immature responses to an interesting question
Lighten up chaps, behind the banter most agree that the RAF do a decent job. You don't have to 'prove' it with daft comparisons with tanks, parachutes and whether or not the Pongo's have ever faught a credible opposition.
The rather strong inference made by Glum was that the money spent on aircraft that had never shot anything down was a waste. I think it's a fair response to point out that there are plenty of weapon systems that have done likewise, & it is certainly not 'immature' to do so.
Ken Scott is online now  
Old 7th Jan 2007, 11:09
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken Scott
The rather strong inference made by Glum was that the money spent on aircraft that had never shot anything down was a waste. I think it's a fair response to point out that there are plenty of weapon systems that have done likewise, & it is certainly not 'immature' to do so.
Now now. Since when has cold hard reason had a place on Pprune. Come on my fellow light blue, lie down and take your kicking from the Army like men.

BTW, out of interest when did Kings Troop Royal Horse Artillery last deploy in a combat role with their horses?
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2007, 18:34
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Among these dark Satanic mills
Posts: 1,197
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BTW, out of interest when did Kings Troop Royal Horse Artillery last deploy in a combat role with their horses?
No idea, but it must have cost a lot less to maintain the horses than it has to maintain the sorry remnants of Fighter Command...

Surely, given how much trade the GR fleets have had in the last 16 years, compared to how little the AD boys have done, it would make more sense to buy a posh new GR aircraft, rather than procure a supposedly world-beating AD aircraft and then try to hang bombs off it? Or am I just being a rotary w**ker again?

TOTD
TorqueOfTheDevil is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2007, 21:56
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Smoke
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JAG3
I was simply looking to find out how many aircraft the RAF has shot down since Korea.
Well probably not that many, but should we ever take on someone with a credible airforce, I'm guessing the number might rise somewhat.
The Burning Bush is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2007, 16:37
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Several miles SSW of Watford Gap
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TorqueOfTheDevil
Surely, given how much trade the GR fleets have had in the last 16 years, compared to how little the AD boys have done, it would make more sense to buy a posh new GR aircraft, rather than procure a supposedly world-beating AD aircraft and then try to hang bombs off it? Or am I just being a rotary w**ker again?
TOTD

History would say otherwise. Some good fighter aircraft have been used in ground attack roles very effectively SE5A,Spitfire, Hurricane, Phantom etc; However, if you build a bomber and then try and turn it into a fighter then you get... ... well an F3!
Climebear is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2007, 17:12
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 54
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Burning Bush
Well probably not that many, but should we ever take on someone with a credible airforce, I'm guessing the number might rise somewhat.
Should we ever take on a credible airforce, we're f*cked!

Who counts as credible these days? China? Argentina? Russia?

Who are we likely to take on single-handedly?
glum is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2007, 07:47
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: brizzle
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[quote=Heimdall;3047953]
As far as I am aware, the last RAF pilot flying an RAF aircraft to achieve an air-to-air kill was Fg Off Tim McElhaw of 208 Sqn on 22 May 48.

This rather changes the period of the question which by its very nature would indicate that the RAF had shot down something in the Korean War. Maybe it should have read:

How many aircraft have the RAF shot down since WWII?

I guess the answer would be as above. Would appear that the FAA have had a greater success rate than the RAF (with the help of the few) no wonder the RAF were grinning at the demise of the mighty, combat proven , SHAR.


Sharmine
sharmine is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2007, 07:58
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm surprised someone hasn't mentioned the RAF Javelin that "definitely didn't" shoot down an Indonesian Air Force C130 that "definitely wasn't" dropping paratroopers into Malaysia in the mid sixties during Confrontation.

The incident that "definitely didn't happen" was denied at all levels from day one, but I understsnd there were a few ill-disguised smiles to be seen around Tengah at the time.
Wiley is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.