Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Service Pay - Comment by Boris Johnson

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Service Pay - Comment by Boris Johnson

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Oct 2006, 07:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Service Pay - Comment by Boris Johnson

From today's Daily Telegraph

http://tinyurl.com/y375pn
A2QFI is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 08:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boris Johnson is seen by many as a bumbling fool. I think he's not too bad... although obviously from healthy stock he holds no airs and graces, does not think he is better than the common man (or at least that's how he comes across).

Compare him to the likes of Two A**es, sorry 2 Jags, who is a Labour man, supposedly the party of the people, and his attitude.

Good on Boris for writing this piece. Watch with interest as the Government strike at the speed of a somnabulent 3 toed sloth to remedy the situation.
anotherthing is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 09:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WSM
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not wishing to denigrate Bumbling Boris and his attempts to better our lot but one or two areas of concern over his piece.

From AFPRB report 2006. Military salary for a new recruit is £12162. The lowest rate of pay post phase 2 training is £14323. Also, by implication she is a Servicewomen in the RAF. If so, why would she be required to vacate her quarter because her husband left her? If serving she would be entitled in her own right. And pension contributions?

This seems to be an attempt to have a pop at the government (no problems with that) but he has tried to raise the profile of his attack by cashing in on the current sympathy (?) for the Armed Forces and I do have a problem with being used to further the personal ambitions of any politico.

The lady in question would appear to be an ex dependant (wife of) who works for the MAC in supply flight. No doubt worthy of our sympathy but not RAF.

Last edited by endplay; 26th Oct 2006 at 09:53.
endplay is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 09:24
  #4 (permalink)  
WPH
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cambs
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not convinced the article refers to Armed Forces Service pay, rather MOD Civil Service pay. Our lowest pay band pays about 14K before tax and we obviously have a non-contributory pension scheme. But I'm all for rewarding our highly skilled under paid, hard-working civil servants with a well deserved pay rise. Anyway, she better hope the Union don't find out that she's currently working 45 hrs a week - she's supposed to be working to rule!

EndPlay beat me to it!

Last edited by WPH; 26th Oct 2006 at 09:25. Reason: Beaten to it!
WPH is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 09:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wilts
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Endplay, agreed, not uniform. However, Boris is highlighting 2 important points. Brown has cleverly been buying votes by using state money for susidies. In doing so he has created a huge disincentive to work at the margin. He is making millions of people dependent on state coffers and more likely to vote Labour. Council Tax has risen because public sector pensions are not fully funded by Govt and yet he has also massively increased the public sector workforce. Never said he (Br00n), was not clever!
nigegilb is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 10:23
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Looking out of the window
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WPH
Not convinced the article refers to Armed Forces Service pay, rather MOD Civil Service pay. Our lowest pay band pays about 14K before tax and we obviously have a non-contributory pension scheme.
Just to clarify a couple of points.
The lowest pay band in the Civil Service, E2 starts on £11.220.
My pension is contributory at 3.5%
The normal contracted hours are 37 working hours, there maybe some reference to 42 hours but this assumes a one hour unpaid lunch break.
Holidays are , 25 days, rising to 30 day paid holiday plus 10.5 days public and privilege holidays. Job security was also and incentive.

The downsides can be working with service people who resent the creeping civilianisation of 8-5 jobs. This is more apparent in the middle management who seem to get upset that they don't have the same powers over a civilian as they do a service person. To add some balance there are plenty of Civil Servants who are complete co*ks.
Molesworth Hold is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 10:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did Helicopter Lady provide those figures I wonder? Furthermore I notice there is no mention of CSA payments (or similar) from Hubby?
mutleyfour is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 11:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Molesworth Hold
The downsides can be working with service people who resent the creeping civilianisation of 8-5 jobs. This is more apparent in the middle management who seem to get upset that they don't have the same powers over a civilian as they do a service person.
Not a defence, just an observation. As they are paid 8-4.30, with flexitime allowed grudingly and overtime not at all, you can understand why some are apparently jobsworths.

It would be too easy to work through lunch, smile, and give a service. Unfortunately the treasury isn't paying them to .

Where they all go for lunch at the same time, assuming there is more than one, then that is an issue that management should tackle. Unfortunately they might counter that they all want to go to lunch/mess/gym or wherever as a social group.

Yes, uniformed middle management does not have much power except when it comes to a bonus recommendation. Even then it becomes a lottery and the best deserving may be disincentivised by being turned down after a good recommendation.

No, mixing lowly hourly paid workers with daily rate workers is always going to lead to friction laregly caused by not understanding the differences.
Wader2 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 11:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Forres
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find it sad that a person working full time within the RAF structure, as this lady is clearly doing, is not eligible for a Family Quarter. Her dependants are also the dependants of a serviceman, which adds to the disappointment. Civilianisation is creeping ahead throughout the Armed Forces and the DHE (DEFENCE HOUSING Executive) policy relating to eligibility should be reviewed.
Kev Nurse is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 11:50
  #10 (permalink)  

Nexialist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what was said about Council Tax at near the end of the article, it seems as though Council Tax is being deducted from her pay, for the Married Quarters she was in with hubby, despite the fact she has moved out. Definatly need more info to make an informed judgement though.
Although Hubby sounds like a bit of a though if he isn't making a substatial contribution to his kids' upbringing - even if it might be "off the books" - though this would be madness as maintenance payments are taken from pretax income, and the only benefit of going off books is when the maintenance would take your ex-partner over thresholds for benefit payments.
Paul Wilson is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 12:30
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kev Nurse
I find it sad that a person working full time within the RAF structure, , is not eligible for a Family Quarter.
You have to be a member of the forces to get a quarter. It is not clear that she is a serving member or whether Boris is just using smoke and mirrors to effect.

What seems clear is that the quarter was in her husband's name. The husband leave - her entitlement ceases.

Hard rules and one where there may be room for some element of compassion, such as when the cessation of entitlement is a result of the husband's death in active service.

If every 'ex-wife of' was able to retain a quarter . . . no don't go there.
Wader2 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 13:24
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Devon
Age: 70
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And yet, bizzarely, good old Boris voted everytime against the introduction of a national minimum wage. I just cant understand it
Hirsutesme is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 16:31
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hampshire
Age: 49
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd be really interested to hear from someone on this forum who is a current serving member of the armed forces that feels that they are underpaid in someway.
Wannabe1974 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 17:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Forres
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wader, I am aware that the lady does not carry a F1250. However, she is working within the RAF structure and, as such, is as much a part of the team as you or I.
Lets take the move of HQPTC to High Wycombe as an example. Married service person within HQPTC, owns a house in Gloucester and is then moved to High Wycombe. That service person is eligible to move into an FQ and rent out the house in Gloucester. A civilian person, also married and owns a house in Gloucester, working on next desk, cannot move into an FQ upon the move to High Wycombe. I'm not saying that MOD civvies are disadvantaged when faced with these problems (I'm sure there are allowances and compensation schemes), but I do think that DHE's eligibility policy could be widened to include the growing numbers of civilians in our ranks.
I made the point about the dependants because her family, although split up, is truly a Service family (mum and dad both working in/for the RAF). DHE should move with the times.
Kev Nurse is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 17:20
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Underpaid service Personnel

Originally Posted by Wannabe1974
I'd be really interested to hear from someone on this forum who is a current serving member of the armed forces that feels that they are underpaid in someway.
Any Squaddie in Iraq for a start - but he probably can't get onto a computer to tell us! Pay recently calculated at £2 an hour when hours worked are calculated against monthly pay.
A2QFI is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 21:03
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wherever
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Civil Service will help people to move house if they are forced to move by the Civil Service. A friend of mine left Valley for Northolt and she was told if she could sell her house and buy a new one then the Civil Service would make up the losses or even buy the house in Valley.

Beats moving into a substandard quarter.
Saint Evil is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 21:28
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hampshire
Age: 49
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by A2QFI
Any Squaddie in Iraq for a start - but he probably can't get onto a computer to tell us! Pay recently calculated at £2 an hour when hours worked are calculated against monthly pay.
I seem to remember making a similar calculation about my own pay. I think the idea is a bit of a headline-grabber rather than reflecting reality. Yes, lots squaddies are doing too many tours out there. Yes, the conditions are awful and yes I do think they deserve much better support. But, averaged out, over a year, is that still a realistic calculation? And even more so when you factor in the enormous additional benefits? I don't know the answer. I just think that on the whole we're paid pretty well. Even at the most Junior OR band.
Most PVR surveys show that pay is not normally a factor for people leaving the services.
Wannabe1974 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 22:32
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wannabe

The enormous additional benefits you mention, care to educate me?
Kitbag is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2006, 07:07
  #19 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Saint Evil
The Civil Service will help people to move house if they are forced to move by the Civil Service. A friend of mine left Valley for Northolt and she was told if she could sell her house and buy a new one then the Civil Service would make up the losses or even buy the house in Valley.
Beats moving into a substandard quarter.
Kev Nurse, and their lies the rub. Indeed would an essentially civilian employee actually want to live inside a guarded and gated compound, one where friends and relatives have to book in at a guardroom after showing a passport or driving licence and then brave armed guards to get to visit them?

And the service family issue. Sorry. If there is a welfare issue the service has enough difficulty delivering a service to its own personnel and not the entire baggage train. There is SSAFA and RAFA and RAF Benevolent Fund. In this case I think housing was a factor not a potential solution. I think Boris made quite clear she does not want help or handouts she wants a proper wage.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2006, 07:16
  #20 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,428
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
I think Boris made quite clear she does not want help or handouts she wants a proper wage.
No, she just wants the thieving barst*rds to stop taking so much of it straight back in the form of one tax or another.

I´d be all in favour of raising tax thresholds to take a lot more of the poor out of the poverty trap whilst reducing various grants and allowances as an incentive to work. Labour works on the opposite premise with the aim of making those at the bottom beholden to them.
ORAC is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.