Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

C-130J Upgrade Programme

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

C-130J Upgrade Programme

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Oct 2006, 22:55
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You read some things that just make your blood boil and they are normally posted by f@ckwits with the brains of a duck

"Still, lots of time away on trials eh?"

Who does the trials you ar@e, those at the caolface currently on det after det or the muppets at Boscombe who are civvies, in no hurry and go home every feckin night

"(complete with operator)"..............FOR WHAT FECKIIN USE

all spelling mistakes are "df" alcohol induced
Always_broken_in_wilts is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2006, 23:19
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
The problem is that if you put an additional crewmember onto a 2 man flight deck just to operate a 'new' piece of kit, for 99% of the time he will have NOTHING to do. As that would seem to be a waste of a presumeably highly qualified aircrew person, the temptation would be to give them other jobs, just to fill their time up, such as the radios or reading the FRCs or even God forbid, doing navigation, & before you know it you have a 3 man flight deck because you can't even go to the USA without that person because you've built them into the system.

Or the WSOp(ALM) could do it, with no increase in crew numbers.
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2006, 23:52
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 54
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ABIW:

I've been there you f*ckwit. It was written tongue in cheek, and as per bloody usual you stomp round the forum shooting at stuff like a damn yank.

Reeled in...

And as for the operator, the one needed to operate the piece of kit which has been bolted to the back desk as we can't afford to integrate it. Am I using words which are too long for you to understand, or are you p*ssed?

Ken:

My idea would be to use someone who already has a job on the squadron, such as the loadie. On a normal flight with no defense requirement, you have one loadie. On one requiring the extra kit, you take two. Seems pretty cheap and effective to me...
glum is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2006, 18:32
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N51 09".94 W001 45".51
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
muppets

By muppets at boscombe i assume you mean the guys who work damn hard to clear the kit you need as fast as possible. Maybe the same guys who were working the J before you had ever seen one. I can tell you that having spent time with the semi trained flems at lyneham i can see why they send the trials to us for a safe conclusion. Stones and glass houses abiw
billynospares is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 08:20
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: S England
Age: 54
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to put this J Versus K argument into perspective, it would be interesting to know what some of you guys/gals actually do.

Mr Bernoulli
glum
Scitzo legman
nigegilb

You chaps are openly hostile to the J, you wouldn't happen to be Navs or Air Eng's would you? (Or is that a ridiculously obvious question?)

For what it's worth, I've been an 'passenger' (don't ask!) on both types and I know which one I want the next time. It's the one with plenty of room on the Flight Deck and enought umph to get my boys and their boxes to where we need to go.
Chicken Leg is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 08:54
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 54
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not hostile to the J! I think it COULD be great if we could afford the bits it needs to do all the jobs it has to do. As it is, it's just very good.
glum is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 10:17
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: S England
Age: 54
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes glum, but are you a Nav or an Air Eng?!
Chicken Leg is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 11:18
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In the dark
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder what the 99 Sqn crews are making of this thread? Probably too busy doing their primary job to post.
FormerFlake is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 11:57
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 54
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neither!
glum is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.