Scrap the RAF
Guest
Posts: n/a
SASless, it would be interesting to see the evidence. In my book, one set of comments from an individual doesn't necessarily mean theat the entire RAF are "utterly, utterly....". maybe someone should be out there collating/disseminating evidence that the RAF are actually delivering in many areas?
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: troon
Age: 61
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How about this
We have not 1 but 2 RAF's - One for the navy and one for the Army
Think about it, Both RAF(RN) and RAF(Army) personell could assimilate to their parent Services (Uniform/Rank etc). For assets that aren't controlled by the other 2 services then a Home command could be formed Jointly by the 2 RAF's.
Thinking out loud again...
We have not 1 but 2 RAF's - One for the navy and one for the Army
Think about it, Both RAF(RN) and RAF(Army) personell could assimilate to their parent Services (Uniform/Rank etc). For assets that aren't controlled by the other 2 services then a Home command could be formed Jointly by the 2 RAF's.
Thinking out loud again...
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
And you could call them the Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Navy Air Service. Then we could have a committee on how to coordinate them and the tricky bit about how to divide up the blue and green bits to defend an island......
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We have not 1 but 2 RAF's - One for the navy and one for the Army: RAF(RN) and RAF(Army) personel could assimilate to their parent Services (Uniform/Rank etc). For assets that aren't controlled by the other 2 services then a Home command could be formed Jointly by the 2 RAF's.
Then under CAS we could have CAS(RN), CAS(Army) and CAS(Air). Then of course we would need the approproriate DCAS, VCAS etc. If each type is nominally in STC/1Gp then we would need . . .
We have not 1 but 2 RAF's - One for the navy and one for the Army
And who would decide which personnel were assimilated into which service? Whilst I have a lot of admiration for both the AAC and FAA crews, I have to say I'd rather go and work for Richard Branson's air force than the army or navy. Most people join the RAF because of the 3 services, that is the one that lets them do the job they want, but also because the air force ethos and way of doing things appeals more than the army or navy's. Any forced assimilation would only lead to an even bigger flood of people heading towards the exit.
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Canadians went down this road several years ago. In fact, they went further: they combined all three services into a single command/rank/uniform structure. It was, by all accounts, an unmitigated disaster. They have since returned to a three-service structure, though with a broadly purple top end.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.dti.gov.uk/cgi-bin/er_reconner.pl
Suspicion breeds confidence
You wouldn't even get that. I'm afraid "continuation of employment" comes into play and your contracts would be transferred to your new employer.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: my own, private hell
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And you could call them the Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Navy Air Service. Then we could have a committee on how to coordinate them and the tricky bit about how to divide up the blue and green bits to defend an island......