Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Scrap the RAF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Sep 2006, 16:37
  #21 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
SASless, it would be interesting to see the evidence. In my book, one set of comments from an individual doesn't necessarily mean theat the entire RAF are "utterly, utterly....". maybe someone should be out there collating/disseminating evidence that the RAF are actually delivering in many areas?
 
Old 28th Sep 2006, 17:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: England
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The RAF are utterly utterly useless.

There you go, that's two people's comments. Surely that makes it true
Arthur's Wizard is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2006, 19:19
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somerset
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Scrap The RAF ?

That makes the assumption that it has value !
blodwyn is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2006, 20:50
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The largest AIR FORCE is actually the US Army!
L J R is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2006, 21:28
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: essex
Age: 76
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why all the recent fuss about scrapping the RAF isn't that what successive governments have been slowly doing for the last 30 years or so?
mikip is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2006, 23:46
  #26 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
I think the name of the letter's author, "Richard Need", is probably a typo of the formal contraction, "Dick Weed".
Two's in is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2006, 23:56
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 515 Likes on 215 Posts
Originally Posted by L J R
The largest AIR FORCE is actually the US Army!

The Largest Navy is the US Army....really!


http://www.usmm.org/armynavy.html
SASless is online now  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 06:59
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
?? Navy or Army?

Or was that satire?

Last edited by GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU; 29th Sep 2006 at 07:01. Reason: Finger trouble
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 12:04
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: troon
Age: 61
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about this
We have not 1 but 2 RAF's - One for the navy and one for the Army
Think about it, Both RAF(RN) and RAF(Army) personell could assimilate to their parent Services (Uniform/Rank etc). For assets that aren't controlled by the other 2 services then a Home command could be formed Jointly by the 2 RAF's.
Thinking out loud again...
althenick is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 12:11
  #30 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,418
Received 1,593 Likes on 730 Posts
And you could call them the Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Navy Air Service. Then we could have a committee on how to coordinate them and the tricky bit about how to divide up the blue and green bits to defend an island......
ORAC is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 12:11
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by althenick
We have not 1 but 2 RAF's - One for the navy and one for the Army: RAF(RN) and RAF(Army) personel could assimilate to their parent Services (Uniform/Rank etc). For assets that aren't controlled by the other 2 services then a Home command could be formed Jointly by the 2 RAF's.
Great Idea.

Then under CAS we could have CAS(RN), CAS(Army) and CAS(Air). Then of course we would need the approproriate DCAS, VCAS etc. If each type is nominally in STC/1Gp then we would need . . .
Wader2 is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 12:15
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
We have not 1 but 2 RAF's - One for the navy and one for the Army
Now what would we call these air forces? I know, how about the Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Naval Air Service

And who would decide which personnel were assimilated into which service? Whilst I have a lot of admiration for both the AAC and FAA crews, I have to say I'd rather go and work for Richard Branson's air force than the army or navy. Most people join the RAF because of the 3 services, that is the one that lets them do the job they want, but also because the air force ethos and way of doing things appeals more than the army or navy's. Any forced assimilation would only lead to an even bigger flood of people heading towards the exit.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 12:19
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Canadians went down this road several years ago. In fact, they went further: they combined all three services into a single command/rank/uniform structure. It was, by all accounts, an unmitigated disaster. They have since returned to a three-service structure, though with a broadly purple top end.
scroggs is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 12:21
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Melchett01
Any forced assimilation would only lead to an even bigger flood of people heading towards the exit.
And wouldn't that just suit the politicians of all parties?
Kitbag is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 13:42
  #35 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
If we got rid of the RAF the Navy would only have the Army to bitch about and that wouldn't be much fun.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 14:35
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, if they scrap the RAF then would we all be made redundant, obviously being paid redundancy, and then be expected to sign new contracts/apply to join the Navy/Army?
LunchMonitor is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 14:53
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No but you might be expected to work for a living for a change!
HEDP is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 14:55
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LunchMonitor
So, if they scrap the RAF then would we all be made redundant, obviously being paid redundancy, and then be expected to sign new contracts/apply to join the Navy/Army?
Just hope they don't offer you statutory redundancy - it will come as a shock to some. Check this out:

http://www.dti.gov.uk/cgi-bin/er_reconner.pl
Army Mover is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 15:01
  #39 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
You wouldn't even get that. I'm afraid "continuation of employment" comes into play and your contracts would be transferred to your new employer.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 15:24
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: my own, private hell
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
And you could call them the Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Navy Air Service. Then we could have a committee on how to coordinate them and the tricky bit about how to divide up the blue and green bits to defend an island......
To stict to form they should technically be the Military and Navy Wings of the Royal Flying Corps for about 2 years while everyone ignores the destinction...
BluntedAtBirth is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.