Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Defending the Harrier - I need ammunition

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Defending the Harrier - I need ammunition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 09:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stoke
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Defending the Harrier - I need ammunition

I frequent another forum - and so does a rabid anglophobe who goes by the name "Shooter20000". The man is legendary. Anyway he's currently having a go at that brilliant, though flawed, british invention - the Harrier.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/autog...ges?msg=2488.8

Here's a quote;

I find it interesting that you quote Boyd as thinking the Harrier is a good fighter plane, yet at Red Flag and all of the other ACM/exercise ranges, they regularly get their clocks cleaned and in fact did not have a single A2A kill at any of the various events up untill the time I retired.

Any harrier or ex-harrier pilots out there who can give me ammunition to shoot this odious little tick down? Or better still join the above forum call him on his bull**** yourself.
Pureteenlard is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 09:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the heathen lands
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
for those Ppruners not familiar with ARRSE, the following link relates to the freak of lab testing known as 'Shooter2000'.


http://http://www.arrse.co.uk/cpgn2/...c/t=46647.html

truly the ultimate reason for Post-Natal Abortion...
cokecan is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 09:45
  #3 (permalink)  

TAC Int Bloke
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
in fact did not have a single A2A kill at any of the various events up until the time I retired.
But did OK in the Falklands I hear, or perhaps the real world doesn’t count in his mind?
(Much as I hate to 'big up' the SHAR)
Maple 01 is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 09:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A lot closer to the sea
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red Flag 2003, on a range near to a secret base close to Las Vegas, 800 NAS playing Aggressor in SHARs with the Vipers. Numerous A2A 'kills' (not all BVR!) on muds not paying attention.
Maybe this was after Shooters time but it did happen.
As for getting our 'clocks cleaned' the whole point of playing the bad guy is that the good guys learn how to deal with you. When you are pretending to be a Flogger with all the limits set on you is it overly surprising?

Not sure the GR7s ever get A2A kills as that's not the point of the GR7.
Don't want to start another debate here about SHAR vs GR7
WhiteOvies is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 10:59
  #5 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Of course, everyone knows that the viffjet was designed as a fighter. The bombs etc were only put there to give everything else a fighting chance.
 
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 13:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Angel N1
Posts: 372
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone that refers to "Planes" really has no clue.
Aeronut is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 13:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Shrewsbury, UK
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't even get drawn into debate with him, you can't say something like "The Falklands war not withstanding. Those were special circumstances and under different ones the out come might have been very different." and then purport to be giving balanced judgement, its nonsensical!

To me thats like saying "Ford cars are very unreliable, notwithstanding all the journeys they do make without breaking down, and those are special circumstances where the car has been filled with oil, had it not then the outcome might have been very different!"
RobinXe is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 13:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Waleshire
Age: 60
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's quite simple really. There is no defending the Harrier. It's a noisy hoover set on "blow".

And that bowing thing it does at air shows is really old hat now.
QFIhawkman is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 17:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Wenatchee, WA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shooter2000 is welcome to hate any aircraft he likes. At various times over the last 20 odd years there have been loads of people who arbitrarily decided that the F-16 was too light-weight to do anything, or that the A-10 needed scrapping cause it was a waste of money, or that the B-52 has had its day etc etc.

Based on his devastating lack of knowledge of the Harrier, he thinks it's rubbish.

Based upon his justification, I'd have to say I think that Shooter is either ill-informed or just plain ignorant.

Either one of us could be right or wrong (or both of us for that matter). Frankly I don't care and am off to the bar for a glass of milk and to talk about me and my latest viff-viff nozzley-nozzley exploits.

Single Seat, Single Engine, The Only Way To Fly
SSSETOWTF is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 17:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's quite simple really. There is no defending the Harrier. It's a noisy hoover set on "blow".

And that bowing thing it does at air shows is really old hat now.

Take it you never made the grade QFIdude

all spelling mistakes are "df" alcohol induced
Always_broken_in_wilts is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 18:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Waleshire
Age: 60
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Always_broken_in_wilts

Take it you never made the grade QFIdude

all spelling mistakes are "df" alcohol induced
It's known as humour ABIW. I made the grade on GR1s many years back. And at least on the GR1, when you put the throttles forward, you got a kick in the pants.

Have you not made the grade for the C-17 yet? Or even the J?
QFIhawkman is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 18:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: England
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Just to stir things a bit more:

After a few beers during a friday afternoon session at a secret airbase in Wiltshire, SAOEU members chilling -

"Whats the difference between a Harrier pilot and a 1000lb GP - the latter is not retarded"

"Whats the difference between a Harrier and its driver - the former stops whinning once the sorties over"!
EODFelix is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 18:54
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And at least on the GR1, when you put the throttles forward, you got a kick in the pants.

You obviously never "put the throttle forward" in a lightweight Harrier. I saw 180 kts from parked in less than 1200 feet, approx 5 seconds after brake release. The thing is a screaming jet engine with a seat. And after getting airborne you could pull it into a almost vertical climb, and roll off the top with aplomb. It's amazing, best fun you can have.
Pope Mobile is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 19:17
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Waleshire
Age: 60
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pope Mobile
And at least on the GR1, when you put the throttles forward, you got a kick in the pants.

You obviously never "put the throttle forward" in a lightweight Harrier. I saw 180 kts from parked in less than 1200 feet, approx 5 seconds after brake release. The thing is a screaming jet engine with a seat. And after getting airborne you could pull it into a almost vertical climb, and roll off the top with aplomb. It's amazing, best fun you can have.
No, I never had the pleasure. Believe me, t'was only light hearted banter directed at our employment challenged "K" tea maker.

No offence intended to Harrier mates. A fine aircraft.
QFIhawkman is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 20:37
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good reply QFIHawkman,

but until your airplane has two ovens, two fridges, two hot jugs and two freezers at least, it does not matter how fast it goes, it is still not worth flying in!

Y_G
Yeller_Gait is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 20:51
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree Yella, it is always a nice touch to get into YOUR aircraft with all those comforts of home while you whisk us off back home after we drop all those bombs etc from the cramped conditions of 7-8 hours in my not so well equipped aircraft.
L J R is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 21:20
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 517 Likes on 215 Posts
Gee! Almost vertical!

What about lighting the twin fires....rotate on takeoff to vertical and accelerate past mach 1.0 then roll out at the top and go about your business at some ridiculous height and speed?
SASless is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 21:48
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Waleshire
Age: 60
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Gee! Almost vertical!

What about lighting the twin fires....rotate on takeoff to vertical and accelerate past mach 1.0 then roll out at the top and go about your business at some ridiculous height and speed?
I thank you SASless.

Yeller gait..... I'm having trouble. Two fridges, ovens, FREEZERS? You had me for a while there, I was thinking about the BAe146. You must be a L1011 man!

A mighty fine aeroplane. Got me back from Kabul last year in three seat comfort all the way. A big thanks guys, always nice to fly 216.
QFIhawkman is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 22:11
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
....rotate on takeoff to vertical and accelerate past mach 1.0....
Saturn V with a couple of flameouts??
Zoom is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2006, 22:16
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Waleshire
Age: 60
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ratty1
Do you know if their loadies have a girl in every port?
Bugger off ratty! I'm not biting on the "Sheep in every field" way of things!

By the way, what aircraft do YOU fly?
QFIhawkman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.