Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Defending the Harrier - I need ammunition

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Defending the Harrier - I need ammunition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Oct 2006, 10:37
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GlosMikeP
Report on page 23 of the Oct 06 edition, under the main commentary on "Wings over Europe" is a sub-section "Red Harriers", a highly paraphrased extract from which is:

Among the nations interested in the Harrier was the People's Republic of China. During the 1970s John Farley was asked to give a flight in a 2-seat harrier to the second-in-command of the People's Liberation Army Air Force - a current MiG pilot............However a combination of UK inflation and the hot,high environment from where they would be operating put paid to the idea. As a postscript, after the Falkland's war the same General contacted John to say "If we had realised how good the Harrier was we would have found the money for it somehow!"

From the National Archives:

"Covering dates: 1973 April 11
Scope and content: Defence implications of the sale of Harrier aircraft and Spey aircraft engines to China.
Access conditions: Normal Closure before FOI Act: 30 years
Closure status: Open Document, Open Description
Held by: The National Archives, Kew"

Images of Harrier GR.3, serial XZ965, on display in China. I believe that the late Ray Hanna swapped the GR.3 for an La-9?!

http://afwing.com/gallery/beijing.htm

Maybe John Farley can add some more info on the snippets from this webpage?

http://harrier.hyperlinx.cz/gallery/mod8.htm
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2006, 19:11
  #62 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
His name was Mr Ma
John Farley is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2006, 21:24
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Wenatchee, WA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While, at first look, it should be relatively straight-forward to bolt the AV-8B gun onto a GR7/9. I believe a major stumbling block / expense would be that no other box / structure / weapon on the aircraft has had vibration testing to the required level (ie to demonstrate that they can survive the vibration of repeated gun firings). Not sure whether this could be circumvented by an OEC though - anyone from IPT world able to shed any light?

Add to that the woeful (IMHO) reluctance by the UK and US Harrier worlds to share knowledge, (eg look at the OSCAR/H20/H40 upgrade to the AV-8B and how it is almost identical to the GR9 programme, but both have been planned and run in complete isolation) it would be a break with tradition for us to just grab their gun, bolt it on and go.

Without a nice APG-65 or Blue Vixen in the front to give you a radar CCIP, the GR7/9's aiming options would realistically limit it to an area weapon - which is what we have with CRV-7 anyway. Finally, now we strap the TIALD pod on the gun station anyway (on some jets), and we didn't buy the big engine for the whole fleet so could really do without having to carry the extra 1000lb of weight around unless it's absolutely necessary. Overall I don't think it's as simple as 'we want a gun, and that one on the shelf looks nice and shiney' - but in principle it's a great idea.

Regards,
Single Seat, Single Engine, The Only Way To Fly
SSSETOWTF is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 05:57
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Northants
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SSSETHOWF,

So without radar the GR7/9 is limited to delivering "area" weapons. What about ARBS/GPS Baro etc? What's the CEP on dumb deliveries from 45deg, 10,000ft? Let me tell you, it aint changed from when I did it and it wasn't much then!
Flap62 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 10:25
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by John Farley
His name was Mr Ma
Highly inventive communications plan I thought, though I left it out here for brevity.

Did it work flawlessly?
GlosMikeP is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 22:15
  #66 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GlosMikeP

In a word yes

John Farley is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 23:03
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
John

Couldn't be clearer in morse!
GlosMikeP is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2006, 00:13
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A Small Island
Age: 48
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SSSETOWTF
Add to that the woeful (IMHO) reluctance by the UK and US Harrier worlds to share knowledge, (eg look at the OSCAR/H20/H40 upgrade to the AV-8B and how it is almost identical to the GR9 programme, but both have been planned and run in complete isolation) it would be a break with tradition for us to just grab their gun, bolt it on and go.
Good points all, very frustrating how the two programs diverged, another case of "work harder, not smarter" for both services.

Not having the radar for ranging does degrade slant range calculation but it doesn't seem to be an order of magnitude difference than the ARBs, GPS etc...

Losing the gun station for the TIALD is an issue too, USMC is currently working putting the LITENING on centerline but it's not yet approved. Not sure if that's even an option for GR9.
Semper Jump Jet is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2006, 09:32
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Overseas
Posts: 453
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
A man in the know tells me that the GR9s will have Litening on the same station as TIALD.
LateArmLive is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.