Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UK awaits approval to buy Predator B

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK awaits approval to buy Predator B

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Sep 2006, 10:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UK awaits approval to buy Predator B

DATE:05/09/06
SOURCE:Flight International http://www.flightglobal.com/

UK awaits US approval to purchase Predator Bs

By Graham Warwick

Two UAVs to support British operations in Afghanistan as lead-in to Project Dabinett

The UK Ministry of Defence is awaiting US government approval for its planned purchase of two General Atomics Predator B unmanned air vehicles to meet an urgent operational requirement. The development follows UK Treasury permission for funding to be brought forward from the MoD's Project Dabinett long-range, long-endurance intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition and reconnaissance (ISTAR) programme.

A letter of request has been submitted, and Congressional notification of the proposed sale is expected soon, says Air Cdr Nick Gordon, the UK's director equipment capability, ISTAR. The UK wants to field the UAVs to provide a full-motion video capability to support operations in Afghanistan by May next year. The purchase will include electro-optical/infrared and Lynx synthetic-aperture radar payloads and both line-of-sight and beyond line-of-sight communications equipment. Initially, Gordon says, the UAVs will be operated from the control centre at Nellis AFB in Nevada, where UK personnel are already part of the team operating US Air Force MQ-1 Predators over Afghanistan and Iraq.

Gordon told last week's AUVSI Unmanned Systems North America conference in Orlando, Florida that the Predator purchase will be paid for "in a novel way" that involves bringing forward funding from the Dabinett project to fill a gap in the UK's ISR capability. Now in the concept phase, Dabinett is scheduled for an "initial gate" decision in February 2007, with full operational capability planned for 2017.

Dabinett will provide an "adaptable ISR" capability to include cross-cueing sensors and systems, target acquisition and potentially weapons delivery. Although platforms like Northrop Grumman's RQ-4 Global Hawk high-altitude, long-endurance UAV are candidates, Gordon says the UK is also looking into the potential for a UAV with a three-month endurance based on hydrogen fuel-cell power technology being explored by Qinetiq. "It's early days," he says.

At full operational capability, Dabinett is to provide "deep and persistent" ISR over enemy territory, which could involve the use of satellites or require a low-observable UAV. "We will have a UAV capability. Equally it may involve overhead capability," he says, adding: "It will be a system of systems approach."

Last edited by Lazer-Hound; 6th Sep 2006 at 23:56.
Lazer-Hound is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2006, 11:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That just might be a useful bit of kit.

Off the shelf ? Shirley not?

Are we going to redesign the fuselage and fit RR powerplant, UK avionics etc?

Watching with interest.
microlight AV8R is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2006, 11:34
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by microlight AV8R
That just might be a useful bit of kit.

Off the shelf ? Shirley not?

Are we going to redesign the fuselage and fit RR powerplant, UK avionics etc?

Watching with interest.
I certainly hope not, if they're supposed to be in service by Mat 2007. Plus the costs wouldn't be justified for just 2 aircraft.
Lazer-Hound is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2006, 16:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Planet Zob
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think we should fit a gun as well - or maybe not. Oh why not toss a coin or ask the audience to decide.
Also needs to be able to land vertically.
VuctoredThrest is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2006, 16:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Twin Avons, fit a cockpit with room for a systems operator in the nose; omygod I converted it to a Canberra.
chevvron is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2006, 16:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Raptor pod (sans housing??). Is that the Brit connection??. Wonder if the Raptor Data and the Flight Dynamics Satcom link are compatible?


.
L J R is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2006, 16:46
  #7 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LONDON
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UAV sensor resolution and accuracy will enable expanded use of the targeting cycle for interdiction campaigns, while providing a force multiplier and NRT assessment of target damage. All of this combined with the flight Dynamic flight link will see an overall improving battlefield efficiency.
movadinkampa747 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 08:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Planet Zob
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In a slightly more serious note - i thought that Watchkeeper was being bought for this purpose.
VuctoredThrest is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 08:21
  #9 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Watchkeeper has a 150kg payload. Predator B has a 383kg internal payload and can carry a whopping (relatively) 1300kgs externally.

Watchkeeper doesn't drop bombs. Predator B does.
 
Old 6th Sep 2006, 09:20
  #10 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,438
Received 1,597 Likes on 733 Posts


The guy that builds them wants to fit AIM-120 as well...
ORAC is online now  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 09:27
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand that some years ago an Iraqi MiG 25(?) shot down a Predator A that was trying to engage it with Stinger missiles. USAF sent a worn-out Predator past the no-fly zone specifically to test this concept.
Lazer-Hound is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 16:40
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lazor,

The predator A you are talking about (Iraq c2001??) had some good footage of a Flogger flying 'dry' passes around it - presumably as the MiG pilot was vectored but could not get a vis as the predator was too small & too slow to be seen from cockpit of said supersonic interceptor.
L J R is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 19:46
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Not a million miles from EGTF
Age: 68
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't there a video clip or sequence of images of an airliner just missing a Predator?
robin is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 20:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't a Predator but a Luna, otherwise accurate description of an AtoA kill A300 vs UAV.
DaveW is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2006, 11:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hopefully the Royal Artillery will operate them, well they are the experts aren't they... "Drop short 100"
Hoveronly is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2006, 13:17
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
All the better to target women and children.
There was a famous story, some reporters asked a door gunner, "How can you shoot women and children?" and he answered, "It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much." - Michael Herr, Dispatches, 1977 (not Full Metal Jacket, which ripped off the original quote)

Actually, UAVs can be viewed as a way to reduce such disasters. If I'm sitting in an air-conditioned room on Nevada I'm more likely to take a second look at the picture - and much more able to rewind and enlarge the image and then go back for a look - than I would be in the back of a fast jet.
LowObservable is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.