Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Iran Unveils New Fighter

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Iran Unveils New Fighter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Sep 2006, 14:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,387
Received 1,583 Likes on 720 Posts
Iran Unveils New Fighter

TEHRAN, Iran, September 06, 2006- Iran unveiled its first locally manufactured fighter plane Wednesday during large-scale military exercises, state-run television reported. The report said the bomber Saegheh (Thunder) is similar to the American F-18 fighter plane, but "more powerful." It also said the plane was "designed, optimized and improved by Iranian experts."

State TV said the Iranian air force had commissioned the Saegheh plane after many test flights in the past year. Television footage showed the airplane taking off and launching two rockets. The plane had a small cockpit and only one pilot. ....Iranian state television reported that the jet "is able to fire rockets and also to drop bombs and is equipped with an advanced radar system. The fighter jet Saegheh (Thunder), after successful military operations and accurately firing air-to-surface rockets in the Zolfaghar Blow maneuvers, came into the service of the Iranian air force today," the report said.

.....On Wednesday Iran also announced it has developed a 2,000 pound guided bomb named Ghased, or "Messenger," aimed at enhancing its defensive capabilities. "Within the framework of enhancing our defense capabilities and in accordance with our deterrent principles, we have designed and manufactured a 2,000 pound (900-kilogram) guided bomb," Iranian Defense Minister Mostafa Mohammad Najjar was quoted as saying by the ISNA news agency.

ORAC is online now  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 14:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like an F-5 with twin tails. They had F-5s from the USA in the Shah's days. It wouldn't be the first Iranian re-manufacture of the F-5 - see here.
scroggs is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 14:59
  #3 (permalink)  
TheVillagePhotographer.co.uk
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cotswolds UK
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Similar to the F-18, bit more powerful, eh? Those intakes and nozzles look very F-5 ish to me, along with pretty much the rest of it. I think they still manufacture an optimised and improved version of the old Hillman Hunter as well, if memory serves right.

Conan
Conan the Librarian is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 15:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Flatlands
Age: 60
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a hybrid with a bit of F15 thrown in with the tailplane. Interesting to see it dogfighting with the Typhoon in a couple of years during the planned WW3.
Mr Blake is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 15:15
  #5 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,387
Received 1,583 Likes on 720 Posts
Questions.

Are they producing them from scratch or recycling old F-5 fuselage parts?

Are they producing the engines, or using Russian or Chinese engines?

Who is manufacturing the radar? Must be small, Mirage 3/Mig-21 size for the radome.

Guided bomb, GPS, laser or CLOS guidance?
ORAC is online now  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 15:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Blake
Looks like a hybrid with a bit of F15 thrown in with the tailplane. Interesting to see it dogfighting with the Typhoon in a couple of years during the planned WW3.
I wonder how much it cost them to put this jet into service?! I bet you could buy a few of them for every Typhoon! Difference is Typhoon wll whip its ass!
sense1 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 15:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Flatlands
Age: 60
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sense1
I wonder how much it cost them to put this jet into service?! I bet you could buy a few of them for every Typhoon! Difference is Typhoon wll whip its ass!
Well perhaps. Difficult to say not knowing the full capabilities of this new Irani or should that be armani wonder jet. If it lives up to the undoubted hype that will be spouted from the Iran goverment, then we may have a contest. It will be interesting to see it perform against exsisting Irani air power such as the impressive mig 29 etc....
Mr Blake is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 15:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Some-r-set
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder how the F-14 fleet is nowaday in Iran
High_lander is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 16:09
  #9 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a tarted-up F-5, first thoughts are short legs and naff radar. Any other pics ORAC?
Gainesy is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 16:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lowlevel UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Media Appreciation of Aircraft

There are other phots but they indicate the same journo confusion, this time from Iran, that has been covered elsewhere in PPRuNe. Try the images from Iran News and IRNA.
Also try

Grateful for a check on translation because I thought Saeqeh is 'Lightning' whereas the Iranian-made Saegheh (thunderbolt) missile, which has a range of 80-250 km, was test-fired on 20 Aug 06, while another missile, Sagheb (Piercing), was reputed to have been launched from an Iranian submarine on 27 Aug 06 during wargames in the Gulf.

Last edited by Data-Lynx; 6th Sep 2006 at 17:02. Reason: Fit in another image
Data-Lynx is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 16:28
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Usually on Earth
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't Saegheh an Iranian-developed missile?

Edit - Just seen above post, and googled it - It is indeed a surface to surface missile.

Some more info and pics about the plane here http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread170323/pg1

The Shafaq looks to be a more interesting plane than this one though in my opinion.

Last edited by rusty_y2k2; 6th Sep 2006 at 16:45.
rusty_y2k2 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 20:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Waleshire
Age: 60
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting close up of the model on abovetopsecret.com.

It definately is an F-5 with 2 tails! Hardly high tech...

Strap me an Aden on, even I'll have a crack!

(And given the pace of events there, I wouldn't rule that out!)
QFIhawkman is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 21:32
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 506 Likes on 210 Posts
The upgraded F-5 known as the F-20 outperformed the F-16 in some aspects...thus as a dog fighter....this thing might bear a second look before being discarded out of hand.


http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/f5_51.html
SASless is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 22:18
  #14 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 421 Likes on 222 Posts
Originally Posted by Conan the Librarian
I think they still manufacture an optimised and improved version of the old Hillman Hunter as well, if memory serves right.
Conan
Come off it, it wasn't possible to optimise a car like the Hillman Hunter! Mind you, the one I owned had a Borg-Warner FOUR speed automatic gearbox. Phenomenal performance..... 24 mpg at 75 mph and flat out at 85!

I think it was the unoptomatic version
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 6th Sep 2006, 22:33
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
As a fairly simple bloke, what is the advatage of putting two tails on an F-5. It seems to have worked perfectly well with just one for the last few decades and as it appears to be the only external modification I can't think of a good reason. Unless you want to fly really straight.
Bing is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2006, 04:24
  #16 (permalink)  
JetBlast member 2005.
JetBlast member 2006.
Banned 2007
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The US of A - sort of
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
similar to the American F-18 fighter plane, but "more powerful."
that's because it's nuclear powered




right, I'm off to play with my piercing missile now
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh! is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2006, 05:26
  #17 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,387
Received 1,583 Likes on 720 Posts
what is the advatage of putting two tails on an F-5
Excellent article posted here which seems to answer a lot of questions. Iranian Fighter Projects: An Assessment

Just doesn´t really answer the question as too which photo is right and which aircraft was "unveiled", the Sa’eqeh or the F/B-44 “Iranian Lion”.
ORAC is online now  
Old 7th Sep 2006, 11:01
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, does look pretty much like an F20 with an extra fin!

Remember, though, F5s repeatedly kicked the backsides of USN fighter jockies a la Top Gun, USAF Aggressor squadrons et cetera - wonder what the state of Iranian pilot training is? Do you think they've gone contractorised?
Green Meat is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2006, 13:13
  #19 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Green Meat
Hmm, does look pretty much like an F20 with an extra fin!
Remember, though, F5s repeatedly kicked the backsides of USN fighter jockies a la Top Gun, USAF Aggressor squadrons et cetera - wonder what the state of Iranian pilot training is? Do you think they've gone contractorised?

Of course, the F-20 did have the honking big F404 engine and not the dog whistles of the F-5.

And for F-5s v more capable fighter, you're right and wrong. Performance wise, unless in close, nope, not a chance against anything more modern than the F-4. It was selected for the role because it was the closest thing we had to a MiG-21. Small, hard to see and could turn better. When crewed by the more experienced pilots of the various Aggressor squadons, it did its job well and taught the more junior pilots/crews to not fight on the MiG-21's terms but rather use the speed and vertical plane to tangle.

During the first parts of RED FLAGS or roadshows where the Aggressors came to Base X, the F-5s did well. Once the learning curve occurred, the F-5s usually got waxed.

As always, it comes down to the meat servo operating the jet, not just the jet. Or so I've been told.
 
Old 7th Sep 2006, 13:48
  #20 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Better pic
Gainesy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.