Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

The well runs dry

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

The well runs dry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Sep 2006, 10:09
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Flatlands
Age: 60
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That must be the same bloke as in post No9
Mr Blake is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 10:19
  #22 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm old enough to remember the firemen striking in 1977 - and the Pompey-based sailors who I worked with at the time (I was waiting to join the FAA, and temping in Pompey) who had to take second jobs because they were so badly paid.

Firemen seem to have got what they want, and more, and with little impact on their second jobs.

Just wish I could say the same for Jack.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 12:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Muscat, Oman
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the last time this came up, it was pointed out that the Green Goddesses had been sold off and we could no longer stand in for the FB, even if we weren't overstretched.
Ali Barber is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 12:24
  #24 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, but there is so much surplus firefighting kit that the Green Goddesses actually were not needed. That was one of the big fights during the last FRESCO - the firemen were happy for us to use the GGs, but hated the idea of us turning up in a red fire engine - perhaps because if people saw us look the same, then they might work out there is nothing particularly special or mystical about firemen....

You should have heard the rubbish they spouted about refusing to use any vehicle/kit that we touched because we would make it unsafe - claimed they would have to scrap every hose, connector, suit, BA - it was pathetic
South Bound is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 12:45
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Flatlands
Age: 60
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You should have heard the rubbish they spouted about refusing to use any vehicle/kit that we touched because we would make it unsafe - claimed they would have to scrap every hose, connector, suit, BA - it was pathetic[/quote]

I think the term childish would be more appropriate. They are one of the few remaining union cartels left, who still feel they can frighten the goverment into satisfying their demands. They are slowly being modernised, but like a drowning man are thrashing about in vain. For me, their introduction into the 21st century can't come soon enough.
Mr Blake is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 13:24
  #26 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
When the rest of us work nights we expect to work. When firefighters work nights they won't do anything apart from check their kit and go to calls. They won't carry out training, for example, despite the fact that they are being paid for a duty.

BBC report about £400 reclining chairs to replace the bunks from the dormitories.

airborne_artist is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 13:31
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Looking over your shoulder
Age: 50
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of my best mates is a fireman. He's also an ex bootneck, so it surprises me when he now spouts utter crap regarding union rules and more pay / less time rubbish.

I think that the Fireservice is now pretty rotten and should be replaced with a new and more organised group. If these people can't handle the work then cut them loose and offer them a contract that they WILL sign.
Skunkerama is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 13:39
  #28 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting the numbers of RAF Firemen that have PVR'd since experiencing FRESCO. Can't blame them really when they can walk into the Fire Service on twice as much money with half the work...(IMHO, obviously!!!)
South Bound is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 13:47
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Flatlands
Age: 60
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard a rumour that they are no longer recruiting from the Services, because of the "scab" factor in covering their strikes.
Mr Blake is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 14:28
  #30 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sure that would make for an interesting equal ops claim...
South Bound is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 15:13
  #31 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,378
Received 127 Likes on 92 Posts
As AA says, the firemen had a genuine grievance back in 1977 and obtained a result from the dispute that ensured they were subsequently well provided for overall. Fair enough--at the time. Life moves on however --other than in some of the last bastions of union cartels it seems. For those of you who missed it--which will be the majority for obvious geographical reasons, the interview with the union rep here on Granada News was, er, revealing. To summate--and this will come as no surprise---he not only looked like a guest part in Life on Mars---the rhetoric and justification for the strike was also pure 70's.

Thus I wonder why the firemen seemingly continue to elect a representative so entrenched in the past, rather than one who could advance their cause without recourse to "one out" etc. On the other hand, with regard to union practices, I would venture to suggest in the light of very recent experience, that those connected with the public sector are seemingly unaware of the fact it is now 2006
Krystal n chips is online now  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 15:44
  #32 (permalink)  

Inter Arma Enim Silentius Lex Legis
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Krystal wrote:
Thus I wonder why the firemen seemingly continue to elect a representative so entrenched in the past, rather than one who could advance their cause without recourse to "one out" etc.
Because they work in a democracy and they can! They have voted for someone who will look after their interests come what may. A lot of the comments on here come from those of you who do not work in a democratic environment and have no one to look after you. All I can say is don't knock it until you try it!
The Gorilla is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 15:57
  #33 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Gorilla - I work in the ultimate democratic environment - I'm self-employed, so my customers vote on me every time they place an order!

The idea that a firefighter refuses to undertake training because they are on nights is about as outdated as you can get in terms of "working practices".

The Army is under-recruited across the infantry, and many other trades. When did you ever hear that the Fire Service was "having trouble getting the calibre of new recruits"? The Fire Service acknowledge that they get about 100 applications for each vacancy. Go figure
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 16:08
  #34 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,378
Received 127 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by The Gorilla
Krystal wrote:
Because they work in a democracy and they can! They have voted for someone who will look after their interests come what may. A lot of the comments on here come from those of you who do not work in a democratic environment and have no one to look after you. All I can say is don't knock it until you try it!
Gorilla----sorry mate, but I did and I have and frankly--this from a dedicated Grudian reader btw --the union reps were all so far entrenched up a certain managerial orifice, they were neither use nor ornament. I appreciate what your saying however, but frankly in this case I don't think the firemen have a valid case. And just for info. I have spent the last 7days delivering to various University sites around the UK--it's a nice little contract--however, during that time I have lost count of the number I have visited where the porters--ostensibly there to help--cannot or would not assist. Not to mention the classic "sorry, we don't work over lunch" excuse---not even to lift a pen to sign ??---like I said, it's a public sector issue.
Krystal n chips is online now  
Old 1st Sep 2006, 18:55
  #35 (permalink)  

Inter Arma Enim Silentius Lex Legis
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
krystal

I agree that it is mainly a public sector issue but as those on here who are serving will tell you, HMG/Local Authorities would have you work 24 hours a day 365 days a year and pay you in tokens if they could get away with it. As well as make you bring your own equipment to do the job. The Firemen have voted the union reps in and have to live with their choice just as the NUM have had to since 84/85. Why should Public Sector workers be flexible (I am NOT public sector by the way) when the Civil Service and most of HMG most certainly are not. After all we have jobsworths everywhere in our green and pleasant land, that's why you can't buy bananas in pounds anymore!
The Gorilla is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.