Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

BBC 1 - Red Arrows

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

BBC 1 - Red Arrows

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Aug 2006, 19:04
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MARS
Posts: 1,102
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Missed it unfortunately. Spent the time avoiding Pr*&s on the A31.

But what you have to remember is, the Reds would never have existed were it not for the Royal Navy. An emminent Defence Expert at the college of knowledge has written a paper that shows that without the RNs expertise in Officer of the Watch manoeuvres, the RAF would never have had a display team.


Corpen Starboard anyone?
Widger is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 19:10
  #22 (permalink)  
FFP
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by charliegolf
FFP,
Where failure is an option, you can be sure that the 'victims'' approvals would have been required. Presumably, the others said, 'No!'.
CG
Fair point indeed.

Wrathmonk makes a good point also about the publicity side.

They mentioned Chris Rodgers in the programme. If it's the same guy (and there can't be too many of them)I'd have thought his display pilot / Hawk background would have made him a cert....

Last edited by FFP; 28th Aug 2006 at 20:01. Reason: Not telling ya . ..
FFP is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 19:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tombstone
Throughout the programme, they kept pointing out that the Reds were looking for 2 new pilots for next season. I always thought that they selected 3 pilots each year so, when did that change?
I think that you're right, but if the Boss changes, then they will only select 2. Therefore, I suppose the Boss is due to change this year! Only a thought!
GasFitter is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 19:57
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a Cockpit near you
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately i was otherwise engaged, and missed the programme. Does anyone know where i may be able to get a copy of it? Perhaps asking the BBC?

Cheers,

Nick
nick0021 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 20:01
  #25 (permalink)  
REF
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Suffolk
Age: 46
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was interesting to see how the selection process is made. Apart from the awful music is had some really good photography.
REF is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 20:16
  #26 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Julia Bradbury (not bad but Suzy Perry would always get my vote) mentioned on a couple of occasions that the Red Arrows sole function was recruitment and PR for the RAF. I remember many years ago as a very lucky Space Cadet on work experience with RAFAT and CFS at Scampton being told that their main function was to market UK PLC (and help BAE flog the odd Hawk or ten). Recruiting and PR was secondary. Has that changed?

By the way, if anyone with a red flying suit wants to swap their day job for my 777, they're welcome.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 20:51
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Beagle - As it happened she did ask me why they were 'dressed funny'. God it made me feel old.

But the bit she did like was the flying, even if I was a tad disappointed she asked me 'why is the green bit above them ?' when they were inverted.

What followed was based on a bit (lot) of Vino, limited knowledge of inverted flight and not a small amount of WW2 war films as my hands tried to describe formation flight upside down.

Needless to say that by the time I had finished explaining it all and telling eveyone how I could have been a FJ pilot, the room was very, very quite.

In the words of the Sun reporter faced with paying for a 'special massage' I made my excuses and left.
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 21:03
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Englandshire, mostly.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GasFitter
I think that you're right, but if the Boss changes, then they will only select 2. Therefore, I suppose the Boss is due to change this year! Only a thought!
That would indeed make sense, Dick is leaving the Reds this year.
Tombstone is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 21:08
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That will be Wing Commander Dickie P I understand.

STH
SirToppamHat is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 21:13
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: kent
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea Jim was a member of that said VGS i had a good chat to him when i visited Valley on an atc camp, he even strapped me in to the hawk as he got the flight for me.
ppljames is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 21:22
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Here n there.
Posts: 905
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
I am going to have to ask the 30 something 'shallow as a tea spoon' question and ask ' so who nailed Julia then?



Well I would....given half a chance..and she'd have to pretty pissed to go for me!!
HM

Last edited by Hueymeister; 28th Aug 2006 at 23:30.
Hueymeister is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 21:37
  #32 (permalink)  
WPH
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cambs
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great programme - love 'em or hate 'em it's refreshing to see some good publicity for the RAF. That should keep the AFCOs busy for a few weeks!
Well done to the participants, despite having to suffer their disappointment on camera.
WPH is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 21:45
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In the dark
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I shared a room with Jim during IOT. He was a former VGS pilot and went Jags from memory.

There was this one time, after a night out in Lincoln when Jim ended up with . How we laughed.
FormerFlake is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 22:27
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manchester
Age: 51
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nick0021
Unfortunately i was otherwise engaged, and missed the programme. Does anyone know where i may be able to get a copy of it? Perhaps asking the BBC?
Cheers,
Nick
If you are really desperate to see it, I still have it on the Sky+ box and could put it on to DVD for you.

Nice to see someone I knew from my days as a cadet achieve his ambition (well almost).
PhoenixDaCat is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 22:42
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: uk
Age: 37
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did anyone hear the presenter say that the vc-10 was the fastest airliner in the world is that true??
lukeylad is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 23:23
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M0.94 if the spoilsports at BAe take away the speed restriction. Normally M0.84, M0.866 if the pub is beckoning.
goldcup is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2006, 06:11
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 15,011
Received 194 Likes on 71 Posts
I was a staff cadet and instructor at the same time as Jim Woodward was on 632 VGS at Ternhill and I have several issues with Jim:


1) How in the name of Lucifers slippers does he manage to look just as young as he did when he was 21 at 31? Git.

2) It was an article of faith amongst all on 632 that, some day, Jim will be in the bleedin Red Arrows - so he's better re-apply pronto.

3) A nicer fellow I think I've rarely met.


Enjoyable programme, interesting insight and comiserations to those who "failed".

WWW
Wee Weasley Welshman is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2006, 06:29
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,830
Received 277 Likes on 112 Posts
M0.94? Dream on......

The VC10K could certainly cruise at M0.88 indicated, but used a lot of fuel doing so. We used to take them to M0.91 during Full Air Tests, but only in a shallow descent. Can't remember what MNE was...M0.925?

Shared a room with a Jag mate, did you? Hmmm......
BEagle is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2006, 08:23
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a Cockpit near you
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PhoenixDaCat ,

Check your PM's

Nick
nick0021 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2006, 09:23
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although not a great fan of the 'Reds' - I used to be in awe of their flying skills and although I would still acknowledge their awesome ability, I think there are fresher, more dynamic displays out there nowadays - the Reds are getting a bit stale. I thought the programme was a good PR for both the Reds and the RAF.

What disappointed me was the last 15 minutes when it descended into a bit of a boys club outing. Yes they have to work together for 3 years and hence get on, but what about 'ordinary' squadron pilots who have to put up with lack of equipment/hours/comfort when risking their lives in theatre?

I appreciate that it was a programme about the Reds, but everything said about cameradrerie and skills etc etc is, in my book, more than surpassed by the Pilots/Observers/Navs and Crewies doing a 'real' tour, as well as the ground grunts.

Felt certain that Kermit was going to get in - his comment about re-applying next year was very honest in my opinion - he is getting married (probably is by now); if he got in on that attempt, it would be something that him and his wife would have to factor in, but it would be a known quantity. Next year, as he would not have that commitment at the time, he might change his priorities because he could.

Many service people put their lives on hold for the job that they are doing at that point in time - they cannot be expected to do so (more so their dependants cannot), for a possible job in the future. What would the interview board rather have - the truth or a lie??

These pilots are first and foremost Officers in the Armed Forces, then pilots, then if lucky and deemed good enough 'Reds'. Maybe the boss of Reds has forgotten that he is first and foremost a servant of the Crown?

Overall a good programme.

Last edited by anotherthing; 29th Aug 2006 at 09:26. Reason: spelling
anotherthing is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.