Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Aircraft needed in Afghanistan

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Aircraft needed in Afghanistan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jul 2006, 22:07
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
Maybe Tony could take up jogging....

http://articles.news.aol.com/news/_a...28004509990004

Several wounded Soldiers and Marines have jogged with the President.

One cannot but admire their strength of character and plain old grit when you see photos like these.
SASless is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2006, 22:20
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is happening with the Mi 17's that are in theatre? Why don't the RAF flythose ?
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 04:57
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: salisbury,uk
Age: 75
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shortage of Battlefield helos

A little background reading for this is contained in a recent book called "Lions led by Donkeys".
This covers several other fiascos inprocurement.
aviationdoc is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 11:52
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SASless
I wish i knew how to post that link to the PM's office. I am utterly staggered that neither Tony Bliar or any of his other cronies that sent our troops to war have been able to muster the small amount of moral courage needed to visit our wounded and say 'Thank you'. Or to visit the families of our dead and offer personal condolences. I dont have a lot of time for George Dubya, but at least he has had the backbone to visit his troops, respect for that.

Jacko, can't you just get one journo to ask Bliar on camera why he has never been to visit the troops or the families. I would love to see him try and squirm out of that one

Last edited by Tigs2; 7th Jul 2006 at 12:32.
Tigs2 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 12:40
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats because he is the head of state and Tony Blair isn't. Has our head of state every visited the sick and injured? Has our head of state every publically thanked her Armed Forces?
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 12:45
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VV

I dont know, and it is right that she should visit, but it wasn't our head of state that sent these young guys and girls to their deaths. It was Bush and Bliar.
Tigs2 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 12:50
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No it wasn't. HM Q is our head of state and we work for her. Tony Blair also works for her...he is the head of HER government. He goes to see her every Tuesday and reports what has been upto. SHE sends HER troops into battle....Her Head of Government just does the dirty work.

HM has on many, many occasions visited her troops (although never in an operational theatre). She has also publically thanked her troops as well as privately thanking her troops. I know, she has privately thanked me for putting myself in harms way.

What you need to remember that in the US, GWB is the Numer 1 whilst in the UK, HM is the number 1 and TB is the Numer 2 (Quite apt really)
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 12:55
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: uk
Age: 37
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has the c130 that crashed a month or so back been replacedi.e has another c130 been deployed ?

Last edited by lukeylad; 7th Jul 2006 at 13:09.
lukeylad is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 13:04
  #89 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol - you are kidding right? Once it's gone it's gone!
South Bound is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 13:31
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VV
Do you really believe that? HM is head of state on paper and does quiz the PM every week, but the last time a monarch disagreed with the Government was the 17th Century. Blair sent our guys to war, not HM. I truely wish the decision had been left with her, we might not be missing 130 troops now. The government runs this country, not the monarchy.
Tigs2 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 14:13
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
Tigs,

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, the various Chiefs, and the Chairman all take the time to visit with wounded soldiers and the families of both the wounded and killed. They do so out of a sense of duty I would think and do not make them publicity stunts. The jogging runs usually start by a soldier telling Bush that he intends to get back on his feet and run and then Bush will tell him that when the soldier or Marine is ready to run...Bush will run with them. I don't know about you but that shows a lot of goodness and a way to encourage those young men during their recuperation.
SASless is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 14:22
  #92 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, for all his faults, at least he seems to give a s t about the boys when they get hurt
South Bound is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 14:50
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SASless
i couldnt agree more. There seems to be very little sense of duty within the british politicians. All very embarrasing really, not all Brits are like that.
Tigs2 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 18:48
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Youre quite right of course but the point I was trying to make is that it is incorrect to compare GWB with TB. Its unfair to state that GWB visits his Sick and Injured whilst TB doesn't. GWB is the head of state and TB isn't.
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 19:11
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vecvechookattack
Youre quite right of course but the point I was trying to make is that it is incorrect to compare GWB with TB. Its unfair to state that GWB visits his Sick and Injured whilst TB doesn't. GWB is the head of state and TB isn't.
Yes, but TB and GWB are both the ones sending the boys and girls into the danger zone, not HM. Ergo TB, as the one who puts our people in the face of danger, is responsible for taking the flak when they get hurt.
grunt@dhfs.org is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 22:54
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting back to the theme

I assume that there aren't too many excess Hawk airframes about these days, bearing in mind the aquisition of a bundle of Alpha-Jets. So, perhaps it would be damn good PR to say nine or ten (one reserve aircraft) Hawks together with a like number of highly skilled and motivated pilots and deploy them to Afghanistan to provide counter-insurgency type support to our troops. I'm sure it would be great for morale on the ground out there and would also be a good oppoprtunity to represent Gt Britain PLC in a slightly different way to that normally employed. My final thought.. The present colour scheme is a little conspicious. Perhaps we could tone it down by a temporary over spray of sand in place of the red and grey in place of the white stripe?? Or shall we really go to town and do them in a nice grey and sand wrap around tactical scheme??

Upon their return I feel sure that the public would look on these 'Few' as being true heroes and a triumphant UK display tour would seem to be in order.

Shall I get my coat
microlight AV8R is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 23:10
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If only we had some Canberras. They were a good plane. Even 2 or 3 would be useful.
harrogate is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 23:24
  #98 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
People at bitching and moaning about the loss of the Jaguar - why not send a squadron to Afghanistan?
Navaleye is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2006, 23:35
  #99 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Navaleye - come on on the tail end of the conversation did we?

Here's a thought - send all the Jags to Mount Pleasant (not hot and not very high either) and recall the F3s. Once the Jags go end of life create a scrapping business for the locals. By that time maybe all of the oil fields will be surveyed and/or sucked dry and the island can be left for the Argies...

just a thought
MarkD is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2006, 06:04
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Somewhere near here
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A10s doing very well, Harriers not so well . Send a squadon of twin-tailed CAS machines - made for the role.
Whizzwheel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.