Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Low or what???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jun 2006, 09:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low or what???



Bronx is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 09:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 289
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
A bit unfair on the crew in the lower compartment with their downward firing ejection seats.
k3k3 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 09:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In the dark
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely it is a bit hard to release your bombs from that height. I think the carrier is safe.
FormerFlake is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 10:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 36 Likes on 14 Posts
Is that a shadow under the B-52, or is it a Buccaneer?
ZH875 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 12:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Englandshire, mostly.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by k3k3
A bit unfair on the crew in the lower compartment with their downward firing ejection seats.
Absolutely,

IMHO, it's nothing more than a foolish display putting some of the crew in a very dodgy position!
Tombstone is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 12:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Standard pilot activity

all spelling mistakes are "df" alcohol induced
Always_broken_in_wilts is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 13:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 515 Likes on 215 Posts
Low level in a Jag over the desert is impressive eh? Low level in a B-52 below flight deck level is impressive!
SASless is online now  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 13:10
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: "you ain't seen me-right"
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wonder if that was the same bloke that killed himself and crew at Fairchild.WA

cc
VTSP
chinny is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 13:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Below the flight deck level of one of those floating leviathans of the US Navy is hardly a challenge; below the deck level of one the the RN's little armoured rowing boats certainly would be though!

But this flypast was too risky to the guys in the downward firing seats, in my view. Although we did similarly stupid things many years ago with guys downstairs who didn't even have bang seats. 350 KIAS at 50ft across a certain East Anglian aerodrome's ASP springs to mind......in a Vulcan.

The Fairchild accident was the sad culmination of a pilot's career of known rule-breaking:

http://www.simradar.com/Feature/2317...child_AFB.html
BEagle is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 13:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not really sure about the points made about bang seats. Any aircraft, with or without, would only be a "twitch" away from disaster. I've seen B52s at very low level on Red Flag (although this one is the winner). If you absolutely have to penetrate a WEZ with little or no support, then this is the way to go. I must confess to being bemused that pictures of Jags and Buccs doing something similar inspire awe, but this does not. Well, I'm impressed
MechGov is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 17:29
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,339
Received 62 Likes on 45 Posts
"Slightly left of centreline- confirm visual with the buccaneer ahead and below"
charliegolf is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 20:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Englandshire, mostly.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Low level in a Jag over the desert is impressive eh? Low level in a B-52 below flight deck level is impressive!
The difference is that the Jag mate has a chance to jump out (albeit not much of one) however, the rear crew of the B52 are at the whim of the cowboy flying it. Not clever but hey, very American...
Tombstone is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 21:46
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MechGov

The difference is it's American.
Bronx is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 22:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bronx,
I'm embarrassed by the fact that I think that you are right. Sorry.
MechGov is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 23:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,371
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With all the concern about the rear crew and downward firing bang seats at ultra low level I'd be curious to know what the drills were for a critical failure (if you can have such a thing with 8 engines) during the take off or final approach. Was it just a case of "5hit happens, it was an emergency"? Any Buff drivers out there who can comment?
Wrathmonk is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2006, 00:14
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Age: 70
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, it's all very well flying a BUFF below the flight deck of an AMERICAN Nimitz-class supercarrier, but let's see them try getting under the flight deck of a BRITISH carrier.

western_roo is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2006, 02:26
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 515 Likes on 215 Posts
Bronx,

Bomber, Carrier, and American...reckon the Green Eyed Monster is scurrying around a bit here?
SASless is online now  
Old 12th Jun 2006, 06:59
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern Turkey
Age: 82
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems to me it's not a question of 'how low can you go?' - any idiot can do that until contact is eventually made. It's more a question of 'how low can you operate?'. We all know that Buccaneers operated very effectively at ultra low level. On the other hand, I well remember competing against SAC B52s with Vulcans. The Buffs were not allowed to fly below 1000ft agl as their 'normal' low level operating height and this, surprise surprise, gave them a considerable edge with radar bombing. At least they didn't bomb blue forces that way.
rodthesod is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2006, 07:03
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Englandshire, mostly.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Bronx,

Bomber, Carrier, and American...reckon the Green Eyed Monster is scurrying around a bit here?
No jealously here Sasless, just a little concern! There is no denying that it's a fine display of flying however, it was stupid.

Balls of steel though...
Tombstone is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2006, 07:17
  #20 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,418
Received 1,593 Likes on 730 Posts
Not the first or last time either, same Sqn from Minot on another trip....Riding the Boeing B-52

........"When we got back to Hickam, Pete and I exchanged notes. At the time, I had thought that OUR low-level fly bys were exciting; Pete's crew apparently had no problem "getting down in the weeds" and had flown their "BUF" past the carrier at or below FLIGHT DECK LEVEL. Pete told me that when he looked out the window, he had to look UP in order to see the island and the masts! P-3 operating procedures only allowed us to fly at a minimum of 200-300 feet, but apparently the Air Force guys had no such minimum altitude limitations.........
ORAC is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.