Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

My trip to stores

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

My trip to stores

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jun 2006, 21:15
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Been out a while - however turning up to stores with overalls in a plastic bag with the subtle arroma of Avtur was always enough to receive a new pair and directions to the skip for the old pair.
RileyDove is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2006, 21:21
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: scotland
Age: 42
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ah riley, apparently I now hav to go to POL and get a chit from them and have that signed by my line manager to say i need new overalls , then go to stores to be issued a new set
fightingchickenplumb is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2006, 23:27
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 84
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My experience of Clothing Stores was that they somehow contrived to be never open at any time you were free to attend! Quite ingenious really.

I recall one very funny Dining Out of a very experienced aviator with many years in and hours in the book, who delivered a wonderful punchline by stating that the highlight of his career was going to the Clothing Store and finding it open.
Samuel is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2006, 06:59
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Having worked in Clothing Stores in the past and currently working in F&L I just thought I'd clear up a few points.

Although it may seem a pain Clothing Stores are correct (to the letter of the law) when they say that they can't accept 'dirty' coveralls. Scrap clothing is sold by tender to textile companies/surplus shops etc after we have finished with it and if a batch were to be contaminated the MoD would find itself liable to large financial penalties.

The point of visiting F&L to get a chit is to ensure that hazardous waste isn't just dumped in the nearest skip before you wander off down to clothing stores for a new romper suit, another source of potential financial penalties.
Yes it may seem a ball ache but (un)fortunately the MoD isn't above EP regulations and careless dumping of contaminated clothing could lead to large fines which if taken into the context of the whole military could seriously chip into an already tight budget.

I am a little confused at the 'fact' you need to have your line manager countersign your contaminated clothing chit though. The chit is a standard format along the lines of the waste transfer note and only F&L personnel are required to sign it as having received the 'product' you are transferring.

Anyway, its no good pointing as USAS says its not there and if it was you couldn't have it as someone else might want it.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2006, 14:29
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Coast
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So why don't clothing stores have a seperate bag for contaminated kit that they take to POL either weekly or when full?

Any section can have a "can do" attitude, just takes a bit of thought.
GolfSierra is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2006, 20:40
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ecosse
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Makes one wonder what they did with the exchanged "Drawers Cellular Airmen" issued in 1962 with a crows foot and a manufacture date of 1947, but still smelling of moth balls after 3 years of wear, tear and washing
From the 'Concise' and for benefit of the new boys - definition of drawer -
"a 2 legged undergarment suspended from the waist"
In those days, every item of clothing was exchangeable - even De-Mob suits for the incumbent National Service chappies!
More better! - I believe present day day grow bags are "Made in China" or somewhere in Asia Going there soon
buoy15 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2006, 20:43
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,300
Received 523 Likes on 218 Posts
Any section can have a "can do" attitude, just takes a bit of thought.

Care to reconsider your comment and try it again?
SASless is online now  
Old 10th Jun 2006, 22:45
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Care to reconsider your comment and try it again?
sounds good to me what's your point?
Glass Half Empty is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 08:06
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by GolfSierra
So why don't clothing stores have a seperate bag for contaminated kit that they take to POL either weekly or when full?
.
Because the 'chit' that is signed by an F&L supplier when you hand your contaminated and double bagged kit to one of us is a waste transfer note (something required under civil EP law) and only a supplier who has undertaken the correct civilian accredited EP courses can sign it.

Just like the large amount of civilian accreditations/regulations creeping into the world of the Cosford master race there is also a large amount creeping into the lowly world of stacking. It has to be complied with unfortunately, with the threat of large fines to individuals (not the MoD as a whole) the not so subtle carrot hanging off the stick.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 08:22
  #30 (permalink)  

Combine Operations
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K.
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You chaps seem to have completely missed the point about stores. They are for storing things. If they were for issuing things they would be called "Issues".
Farmer 1 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 08:45
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Farmer 1
You chaps seem to have completely missed the point about stores. They are for storing things. If they were for issuing things they would be called "Issues".
If that were truely the case we'd all be called storemen (like the Army) rather than Suppliers.

As it is in the RAF only civilians are called storemen, which in my (you may say biased) experience is more true to form.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 10:10
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe someone should consider re-issueing the 1960's Flight Safety film "Frustration".

Nice to see that things haven't changed though.
cazatou is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 10:32
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In the dark
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roadster280
Yep. 12" steel rule, marked with crow's foot 1945, issued 1993ish
That wont keep your legs warm on guard though

I once got told by stores that the GS Jacket that I had been waiting for for 4 months could not not be issued as I was leaving the stn (not the RAF I must add). I was not amused, but still have the jacket.
FormerFlake is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 10:33
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: The Deep South (Sussex)
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
About 40 years ago at RAF Colerne (Yes another place that the Army inherited) we had a stores boss called Mr Pearce. He had been a war time navigator and started the concept that stores were there to supply and not to keep.

He hit on the idea that the flight engineers could all have two pairs of aircrew flying gloves, they could then keep one pair for the dirty jobs (plenty of them on the Hastings) and another for sitting up front and moving fuel cocks and other levers.

Previously the engineers had to change their gloves every few weeks. Within months under Mr Pearce's system the demand for gloves had dropped amazingly.

It would be nice to know if he has any followers in today's Service.
Lou Scannon is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 11:34
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: very west
Age: 65
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
entitlement???

Been out for ten years now, so somewhat out of touch with the 'lean', modern, over-stretched, under-equipped RAF.

Sad to see that somethings haven't changed though. It was nigh on impossible to get stuff out of the stores system before they were integrated into engineering to become Eng and Supply wing. Like most, I was optimistic that this change to the command structure would elliminate the 'stacker bottleneck' that ensured you would never get what you were entitled to. Didn't work. Seem to remember the best inadvertant humour poster was the one about three foot by two and said 'If you are entitled, get it!'

Still laughing about that one all these years later.

Also found over the years that the civvies were more amiable if you paid them at least the minimum respect you would hope to receive yourself instead of just slagging them off.

Anybody remember the other 'jobsworth' line of 'I can't give you the last one, its for AOG only. ' Or, how about 'you're not scaled for that' , or trying to get a hold of a 'duty supplier' after 2100 hrs. Anybody remember what happened when the Army took over a lot of the responsibility for procurement in the late '80's/early '90's e.g. torch batteries? I can still see the look on OC Supply's face when ordered by OC Eng Wg to go and locally purchase these when the Army refused to renew the contract or release what was held.

On a more serious note, I really do hope that our guys and gals at the front lines arn't suffering from this pathetic short-sightedness these days.
camlobe is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 20:15
  #36 (permalink)  

TAC Int Bloke
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, I remember the pongos taking over the supply net - took six months to get a pair of DMS shoes - Army didn't understand why there were so many in the system and cancelled the follow-on contract - doesn’t everyone wear boots all the time?
Maple 01 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2006, 21:03
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,837
Received 279 Likes on 113 Posts
Tried to get some Sqn Ldr rank braid when I was told that I was being promoted.....

None in stores...

Dumb grunts at Bicester say there's 'no demand'.....

BEagle is online now  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 20:39
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: SW England
Age: 69
Posts: 1,501
Received 90 Likes on 36 Posts
In 1979 I went to stores, and boy what a good job they'd done storing things. They issued me with brand new pair of long johns that had been made in 1953.

I think it's a record, but surely a Ppruner can beat it - BEagle, perhaps?
During the 1991 punch-up, boxes of kit arrived for our customers to pick from. Most highly-sought-after item was the sand-coloured, bone-buttoned windproof jackets dated 1942. Nice to see them doing Stirling service after a gap of a generation or 2.
Thud_and_Blunder is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 21:36
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dre's mum's house
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I was clearing just prior to leaving I checked with Stores on what they wanted returning,thinking that they wouldn't want next to skin items e.g socks,long johns. No chance on that one. They wanted every pair of socks and LJs that were in my book. When I had a gander through the book I discovered that I had a pair of leg restraints in my possession which weren't listed. Did they want them back? No because they didn't officially exist!!! Helluva a job to get them to take them back, but God forbid if I didn't have all the socks!!!! Mind you, the requirement was only to return 1 from each pair
The Real Slim Shady is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 21:49
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
I went to stores whilst out in the Sand Pit last year. Am going back again this year ...... might finally have my order in stock!

On a slightly different but stacker-related point, you will be pleased to know that it isn't just our own "beloved" UK stackers that get it spectacularly wrong.

During the current bout of unpleasantness, back in 2003 I had the misfortune of finding myself in the MNF HQ in Baghdad. I was chatting to a Danish guy who told me a story about when the Danes rocked up in MND(SE). Having spent weeks slumming it in the desert, their logs chain finally caught up and to everyones' delight the first batch of supplies arrived in country. The ISO container arrived and was opened to much pomp and circumstance to find ............ a couple of snow ploughs and dozen lawn mowers!!!!

Only if we'd all taken lawn mowers with us, we could have been home by Christmas!
Melchett01 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.