Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

British Plane on Fire in Afghanistan..

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

British Plane on Fire in Afghanistan..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jul 2006, 13:43
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wilts
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was stated earlier that the ac is still doing 40 knots in the photo. Now if we continue with the most obvious explanation that it was indeed a mine, could be the crew received a double engine fire indication. The two fire indications closely following each other. It takes a finite amount of time to react to that situation in the landing rollout. If the ac ran over the mine early in the rollout it would also explain why no engines are in reverse and explain for the damage to the undercarriage. Once more I take my hat off to the crew, tricky handling, cool heads, bloody heroes one and all. I bet the ambassador was impressed.

If Mr TACAT had driven over a landmine he would now be brown bread, unless of course he was driving the ambassador's car. He is a VIP and they don't have to drive in fibre glass Land Rovers. Why is it that our troops always get the worst kit?

Last edited by nigegilb; 10th Jul 2006 at 17:53.
nigegilb is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2006, 22:03
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK Sometimes
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nige

I second those remarks!

Flip
flipster is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2006, 13:52
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK Sometimes
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was fascinated to learn that way back in Aden, the RCT/REME used to clear desert strips for the Beverley by driving a Ferret armoured car up and down the strip. The thinking was that it was better to lose a ferret rather than an aircraft - though I am not sure it would be politically acceptable these days. However, the principle still remains that land mines have been used before to 'down' ac. Anyone know the current SOPs for Landing Zone Safety Officers for such clearances - or have we collectively forgotten the lessons of history??

Flipster
flipster is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2006, 14:15
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wilts
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on Flip, you know better than to ask questions like that. The army have been driving in fibre glass landrovers for years in Iraq. Belated good news today on the armoured vehicles destined for both theatres. Belated, because at least 18 deaths have been attributed to inadequately armoured vehicles. All the same, Des B did a good job.

I am now waiting for the announcement that the landmine was an 'old' one.

Last edited by nigegilb; 25th Jul 2006 at 20:55.
nigegilb is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2006, 15:15
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: england
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the forensic guys will probably inform us that we, the british, manufactured it.

5d2d
500days2do is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2006, 16:58
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
Nig,

Was there an outcry amongst the British public about the "Tommy Cookers" (Sherman Tanks with gasoline engines) during WWII? How many guys died as a result of using gasoline as fuel vice diesel engines?

The Oppos have proven to be very adaptable in the building more sophisticated and capable IED's that defeat even the M1 Abrams armour. There is some point at which no matter what one does....people will still die in combat. That is the nature of that human interaction.
SASless is online now  
Old 25th Jul 2006, 17:31
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Looking out of the window
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Was there an outcry amongst the British public about the "Tommy Cookers" (Sherman Tanks with gasoline engines) during WWII? How many guys died as a result of using gasoline as fuel vice diesel engines?
Just to go off on a tangent that's a poor comparison. British Forces did use Sherman's with diesel engines, the M4A2 (Sherman III to the British.) American forces in the ETO only used gasoline engine vehicles. The term "Tommy Cooker" is German, the British used "Ronson" as in "one strike and it lights." As the war progressed changes were made to the ammunition stowage and the amount of armour, but not the type of engine.

I'll get my anorak.
Molesworth Hold is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2006, 17:42
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wilts
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SASless I think you will find that Uncle Sam is selling us some armoured vehicles in the interim period.

Thanks. I don't suppose you want to trade them for snatch landrovers?

Last edited by nigegilb; 25th Jul 2006 at 20:56.
nigegilb is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2006, 17:56
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
"Snatch Landrovers".....sounds like a crack unit that does hairy things!
SASless is online now  
Old 25th Jul 2006, 19:56
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Closer than you think...
Age: 65
Posts: 390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flipster
3PD
Neither am I a mine-expert, however, I believe that laying a well-hidden landmine is done surprisingly easily - that's why they are blowing off people's legs all over the world - thanks to the nations that sell them! The above strip looks like a nondescript 'bit of desert' and the surface is 'au naturel' making concealment easy.
Quite correct, the likely surface there would without doubt aid in laying and concealing a mine, it would also, dependant on the mine type and depth of lay help reduce a crater, if you consider most of the blast from a mine goes up.... esp. with a shaped charge, and a crater is caused by the blast being deflected down and out by a heavy vehicle such as a tank being on top.

In this case if a mine was the cause it was a relatively fast moving aircraft which has a far higher ground clearance and is far more streamlined on the fuselage side than a tank and thereby more likely to deflect any blastup and to the side rather than down, that saying an A/T mine would punch right through the aircraft skin without even slowing down. As to damage to the port U/C assembly I wouldn’t like to say, never seen one go over a mine before but I wouldn’t think it would be pretty if it was an A/T mine.

An A/P mine would most likely just burst the tyres and take out the wheel bay hydraulics, may even spread some shrap' but that may/may not have reached the engines at that speed. A bouncing mine on the other hand...

But this is all guess work and until the BoE reports we really won’t know, what is without doubt is the skill and professionalism of the crew in stopping a rolling wreck and getting everyone out so well. Well done.
Always a Sapper is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2006, 07:59
  #131 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nige,
Slightly off topic but I notice that you have twice talked of "Fibre-glass Land Rovers". In fact, all LR bodywork is of an aluminium alloy. (Don't want to give the politicians any wriggle room in PQs).

I agree with your sentiment that they are flimsy and totally inadequate, protection wise. Power to your elbow mate.
Gainesy is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2006, 08:16
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wilts
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Gainesy,
I almost got involved in the army LR campaign, but I rapidly realised it was quite a complicated subject with no obvious solution aka foam for Herc. It was clear that the army were having to use whatever vehicle was available even if it was not fit for purpose, but I decided to leave it to the experts. I have to say I am impressed with what Des Browne has sorted. He has gone direct to the manufacturer and uparmed the existing design. And no, it is not being built in the UK at great cost and time delay, as a result, the boys should have the vehicles in the next few months. Contrast this with the Typhoon and Apache farce. More power to the elbow of Des and DEC! Maybe they will learn from this. How about some Russian helicopters next and sort the Hercs out somewhere else.

Seriously I have been a big critic of the woeful state of equipment and protection but credit where it is due, everyone involved did a great job.

Last edited by nigegilb; 26th Jul 2006 at 09:37.
nigegilb is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2006, 08:20
  #133 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Gainsey

I think that what is being referred to here are the "Snatch" LRs which have an element of armour (but insufficient for the risks in theatre). They are designed to withstand small arms fire, but do not provide any protection from the large IEDs that are being used in Iraq.

I'm not sure, but I think the armour is contained with a fibre-glass shell, hence the expression.

Times article which confirms my theory.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2006, 09:01
  #134 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AA,
Point taken, they are still inadequate. May I suggest we leave it there to avoid thread drift?

So, any word that it was a land mine?
Gainesy is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2006, 09:31
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wilts
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No definite word on land mine but asside from a couple of other theories at the time of the incident I have no reason to believe it is anything other than a land mine. Don't know what sort for sure either.
nigegilb is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2006, 10:25
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,185
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
""Snatch Landrovers".....sounds like a crack unit that does hairy things!"

Diet coke all over the monitor now.....
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2006, 10:45
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flipster
I was fascinated to learn that way back in Aden, the RCT/REME used to clear desert strips for the Beverley by driving a Ferret armoured car up and down the strip. ....
Flipster
Ah - memories. Day in the life of an Army Mover I guess.
Army Mover is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2006, 13:27
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK Sometimes
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets hope the army really do get the protective kit they deserve but one hopes that it won't be sufficient enough to allow them to clear LZs for Albert!
flipster is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2006, 19:25
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Closer than you think...
Age: 65
Posts: 390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flipster
Lets hope the army really do get the protective kit they deserve but one hopes that it won't be sufficient enough to allow them to clear LZs for Albert!
Already got it mate.... The Famous 'Aardvark' A scary bit of kit and for the operator apparently an experience to be missed when it 'finds' something noisy!!!
Always a Sapper is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2006, 09:19
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK Sometimes
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The aadvark is an impressive bit of kit but I doubt it was used to sweep the LZ. All kinds of questions spring to mind!
flipster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.