Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Typhoon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th May 2006 | 19:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Middle Drawer
Typhoon

Love it, loathe it, want it or not Typhoon is here to stay

Some very good footage here.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/115274...ghter_typhoon/

Talk Wrench


PS, Is there any chance that a Mil Aircrew forum Good Video thread could be started up. It may have been done before but I cant find one.
Talk Wrench is offline  
Old 11th May 2006 | 22:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: UK
Quite some time ago...

http://www.eurofighter.com/News/Arti...NewsItemId=190
RIDIM is offline  
Old 11th May 2006 | 22:38
  #3 (permalink)  
100 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 329
Likes: 2
From: Turks and Cacos
It looks very nice.

What's it used for?

More importantly. Ten years down the line will anyone actually say? "It's a bl00dy good job we had that squadron of Typhoons"

Nah thought not.
On_The_Top_Bunk is offline  
Old 11th May 2006 | 23:06
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 80
From: Just behind the back of beyond....
Top Bunk,

And what would we say that about?

Apart from:

Those FRS1s in the Falklands. That Chinook in the Falklands. The TIALD Tornados in Granby. ALARM. The TIALD Jags in Bosnia. The Canberra PR9s and R1s in Afghanistan. Storm Shadow in Telic. The Merlins in Iraq? Tankers again and again and again.

As a deployable, affordable, multi-role fast jet I'd suggest that there's as much chance of Typhoon providing a life-saving "what we need exactly when we need it" as there is of anything else doing so.

JTO, RIDIM,

Without picking holes, BAE did that. Weren't 17 supposed to have banged off an AIM-120 or two by now, following their ASRAAM successes last year?
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 11th May 2006 | 23:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: London
I don't think anyone would deny that Typhoon is a vast improvement on what the RAF has now, and will in various low-medium threat environments prove useful in the future (obviously high-threat will require stealth and/or UCAVs), but isn't the real question, do we really need all 232 of them? Surely tranches 1 & 2 will suffice for the RAF's needs? Wouldn't the tranche 3 money be better spent on tankers, transports, some sort of nascent U(C) AV capability? Or maybe even (perish the thought) decent kit for the army?
Lazer-Hound is offline  
Old 12th May 2006 | 07:33
  #6 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 16,700
Likes: 54
From: Lincolnshire
Jackinoko, you forgot the Buccaneers in Granby and the Vulcan/Victor, esp the Victor.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th May 2006 | 07:59
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: Nomadic
Everyone to their own, Jacko, but 'successful' would not be the words that I would use for the RAF's equipment during said ops.

'Sufficient' arguably - then again that is all Brit taxpayers need, but the cost and functionality of some of the BWOS stuff Vs 'allied equivalent - off the shelf products' is questionable.

Point of note was Bucc with 'old' stuff in 1991 doing pretty much what TIALD does now!
L J R is offline  
Old 12th May 2006 | 08:15
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 80
From: Just behind the back of beyond....
I was just thrashing round for
"Thank God we had those, then" moments.

And there really weren't many, which was kind of the point.

Only a handful were also examples of equipment that performed better than anything anyone else had at the time. (R1, PR9 with RADEOS, [ul]Jag[/ul]/TIALD - what a hit rate they had in Bosnia!).

Though actually, of the examples given, most were rather more than adequate, though some of the Gramby stuff was significant because it was there at all, not because it performed flawlessly (TIALD/Tornado, ALARM).
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 12th May 2006 | 08:34
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: YES
I would like to say in 10 years time Typhoon was a superb airshow display but we never saw what it was like operationally because we never needed to deploy it operationally!

But I hope in 10 years time we are happy with its operational performance and when it comes to be replaced it is treated with affection and its successor criticised for not being able to do what Typhoon can do now.
NURSE is offline  
Old 12th May 2006 | 08:53
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: UK
Originally Posted by NURSE
But I hope ..... its successor [is] criticised for not being able to do what Typhoon can do now.
Well I sincerely hope that you are wrong on that last point, NURSE. I would like to think that each new bit of kit will be better than its predecessor (which will undoubtedly be the case here), even though many times in our military equipment procurement history that has not been so.
Zoom is offline  
Old 12th May 2006 | 09:27
  #11 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ultimate w!lly waving competition?

FJ booked for RIAT this year (so far) are .....

F-15C (West Coast demo team)

USN F-18 (Ric Traven again - should be good)

F-16 from 306 Sqn

Slovak Mig-29 (the thrust vectoring OVT thing)

Gripen

Swiss Hornet

.... and a Spanish Typhoon.

All in the air over EGVA on the same day. Might solve a lot of arguments!
 
Old 12th May 2006 | 09:39
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: In the Doghouse...
Slovak Mig-29 (the thrust vectoring OVT thing)
The Slovak MiG-29 is a standard aircraft, the OVT thingy is a different jet, a company demonstrator over for Farnborough- should produce a wacky display...
tonyosborne is offline  
Old 12th May 2006 | 09:49
  #13 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
TonyO

Sorry, yes, you're right.

Ok, 2 Migs!
 
Old 12th May 2006 | 14:08
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Magnetogorsk
Oh Very True

Originally Posted by tonyosborne
...a company demonstrator over for Farnborough- should produce a wacky display...
Yeah, if it doesn't pile in at ILA next week.
It's a breath-taking display though, even better than any of the TVC Russians we've seen before (believe it). So if it does make it to F'boro do go and see it...
...but early in the week.
VC
Violet Club is offline  
Old 12th May 2006 | 17:38
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,682
Likes: 63
From: Far West Wessex
Wot, another live K-36D demo?
LowObservable is offline  
Old 13th May 2006 | 08:54
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Brilliant, so you are suggesting that an airshow is the best place to assess our latest pointy aquisition? That must be ideal to demonstrate its abilities
Ivan Rogov is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.