Future Carrier (Including Costs)
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The last Yeovilton based FW were scrapped in 2005 weren't they? That year comes to mind but I could be wrong. Its a long time ago. The guys that were the Aircraft Handlers then actually working the decks and the hangars at Leading Hand level have mostly left or unsurprisingly been promoted to CPO or Warrant. There is still a hard core of the right people knocking around, (just about) but they wont survive or wait forever. But I'm still confident the Navy will be able to do it though, with the deck side of things. They still have the School of Flight Deck Operations to train the newcomers and that is still based around a hard core of highly experienced Senior Ratings. Just a case of sensibly bringing people in, bringing them up to speed - its not rocket science. I wouldn't worry about the ratings, its the officers I would be worried about. Are they going to be able to fill the controller billets, the ATC side of things? Who will act as Cdr Air, and "F"? Far harder boots to fill IMHO. Hard enough getting good ones when they were going cheap...
If the flight trials are in 2018, as above its not that far away really (after all this time). If they were worried about getting experienced people in (which I'm sure they are not anyway) they should make arrangements to recruit ex people as short term reservists even - I'm sure they would come back - or even bring people back as civilians to help mentor and train the young guys until they get up to speed.
If the flight trials are in 2018, as above its not that far away really (after all this time). If they were worried about getting experienced people in (which I'm sure they are not anyway) they should make arrangements to recruit ex people as short term reservists even - I'm sure they would come back - or even bring people back as civilians to help mentor and train the young guys until they get up to speed.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SW
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"its the officers I would be worried about."
Shouldn't we all!
"Are they going to be able to fill the controller billets, the ATC side of things? Who will act as Cdr Air, and "F"? Far harder boots to fill IMHO. Hard enough getting good ones when they were going cheap..."
Someone better tell drafty and the appointers that there are some carriers coming so that they can start to get people trained up and in post!
"even bring people back as civilians to help mentor and train the young guys until they get up to speed."
Don't worry instead of doing any planning or training, we've ordered all available back-order box sets of "Sailor" and are sending them out to people to watch on the train up to Rosyth the day before they join.
Shouldn't we all!
"Are they going to be able to fill the controller billets, the ATC side of things? Who will act as Cdr Air, and "F"? Far harder boots to fill IMHO. Hard enough getting good ones when they were going cheap..."
Someone better tell drafty and the appointers that there are some carriers coming so that they can start to get people trained up and in post!
"even bring people back as civilians to help mentor and train the young guys until they get up to speed."
Don't worry instead of doing any planning or training, we've ordered all available back-order box sets of "Sailor" and are sending them out to people to watch on the train up to Rosyth the day before they join.
Originally Posted by Hangarshuffle
...its the officers I would be worried about. Are they going to be able to fill the controller billets, the ATC side of things?
151125-N-MQ094-044 ATLANTIC OCEAN (Nov. 25, 2015)
Leftenant (sic) A. Roberts, from the U.K. Royal Navy, receives an update from Air Traffic Controller 2nd Class C. Ramirez in the Carrier Air Traffic Control Center aboard aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75). Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group is deployed to support maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operation. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class E. Miller/Released)
Leftenant (sic) A. Roberts, from the U.K. Royal Navy, receives an update from Air Traffic Controller 2nd Class C. Ramirez in the Carrier Air Traffic Control Center aboard aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75). Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group is deployed to support maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operation. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class E. Miller/Released)
PDR
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Yeovil
Age: 53
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There seems to be a lot of panic regarding flight deck ops. We have been using carriers since the Harrier ZFPs went out of service. Is the recovery of an F-35 VSTOL largely different to the recovery of a Merlin/Sea King? And launching is hardly taxing, just roll them up to the line and say go! Aircraft movements are aircraft movements, just using a different deck. Calm down people, the RN will achieve!
I would have done, but this was an operational voyage so there were no foreign nationals on board.
I had to use an earthing northerner instead. It normally works, but this one was the leader of the ship's band. And unfortunately (as we all know) the ship's band leader is always a hopeless conductor...
PDR
I had to use an earthing northerner instead. It normally works, but this one was the leader of the ship's band. And unfortunately (as we all know) the ship's band leader is always a hopeless conductor...
PDR
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RN are all over this. LLSS has helped to a point, but more importantly it has retained vital experience that would have otherwise withered given the time between the last jets on board and the next time we'll see jets on board. The skills specialised in are important. They aren't necessarily 1:1 of what is required of the individual when they go aboard QEC but it isn't far off.
Overall, the RN have been extremely forward leaning and pragmatic on this issue. Ways to go yet but doing the best we as UK plc can to range a very potent carrier strike capability as soon as practicable. Why pay so much if you can't?
Overall, the RN have been extremely forward leaning and pragmatic on this issue. Ways to go yet but doing the best we as UK plc can to range a very potent carrier strike capability as soon as practicable. Why pay so much if you can't?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anything been published on what a UK Carrier Group will consist of ?
I presume a Carrier, a T45, a T26 and an SSN will be basic - but that's a lot of the Navy's eggs in one place.....................
I presume a Carrier, a T45, a T26 and an SSN will be basic - but that's a lot of the Navy's eggs in one place.....................
Different foes require different assets. Not much need of an SSN if you are bombing Afghanistan.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Carriers generally steam at >18kts (much greater when conducting flight ops). Typical speed of advance for a carrier battle group is usually taken as 20kts. At those speeds an SSN won't be covert, so its a waste of an asset.
PDR
PDR
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But the USN normally have one along.......
it may not be in close formation so it doesn't have to cruise at the same speed - it can sprint and wait.........
You'd feel a bit of t** if some Kilo or a modern german built boat happened to be in the neighbourhood
it may not be in close formation so it doesn't have to cruise at the same speed - it can sprint and wait.........
You'd feel a bit of t** if some Kilo or a modern german built boat happened to be in the neighbourhood
Do they? I admit I'm a bit out of date with submarine tactics, but I was under the impression that the US SSNs always operated independantly, aside fro the odd duty of "sanitising" the area outside the port prior to sortie-ing SSBNs of major battlegroups. An SSN isn't much use if it can't stay covert, and any attempt to communicate with the battlegroup would remove the covertness.
Destroyers sprint & drift when conducting ASW, but then they're not covert in the first place. What's the point in an SSN which broadcasts its presence (and thus the battlegroup's general course and speed) every time it sprints?
I know Clancy proposed convoys of SSNs using sprint & drift so that one could be listening while the others proceeded, but I've never heard of the USN or RN using co-operative groups of SSNs like this, let alone using that as a tactic.
PDR
it may not be in close formation so it doesn't have to cruise at the same speed - it can sprint and wait.........
I know Clancy proposed convoys of SSNs using sprint & drift so that one could be listening while the others proceeded, but I've never heard of the USN or RN using co-operative groups of SSNs like this, let alone using that as a tactic.
PDR