FJ v Helicopter
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North West England
Age: 54
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FJ v Helicopter
Discussion in Work...What is the most effective way for a FJ to tackle both support and attack helicopters? Obviously without giving too much away..
Blame My Parrot
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somerdorset, UK
Age: 69
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Judging by the small numbers of SH/AH brought down by FJ, you are probably better off getting them on the ground with an FGB, or, in the case of AH, with a rifle!
Gaz ED, from the point of view of the evading helicopter, it's difficult to see how a fast-mover is going to visually acquire, track and engage a slow, but moving target. One evasive manouevre is to run at max chat towards the attacking aircraft, staying low down so he has to continually lower his nose to keep sight of you. This would hopefully result in his CFIT behind you.
Slow jet (A10) or prop (Pucara) OTH........
Hunt and engage as pair, as was demonstrated against a couple of Scouts during Op Corporate.
Slow jet (A10) or prop (Pucara) OTH........
Hunt and engage as pair, as was demonstrated against a couple of Scouts during Op Corporate.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Done exercises against A10 and AH with pairs of fighters. AH with chain gun and Stinger, both operating in pairs. Fighters spent as much pulling high G to get out of the sight line of the wingman as they did trying to get into a firing position on the target. Also rarely managed it as the target was more manoeuvrable and close to the ground.
Best advise? If you get a cheap shot, gun/IR/radar against one that hasn´t seen you, it´s worth a shot. If he sees you and starting turning, leave it for another day. You´re going down to fight in his sandbox and there´s too much chance of being hit by something else less small arms or manpad to make it worthwhile.
Anyway, how can you tell zoomy hand combat stories about a fight with a chopper. No street cred whatsoever, particularly if you didn´t get a kill....
Best advise? If you get a cheap shot, gun/IR/radar against one that hasn´t seen you, it´s worth a shot. If he sees you and starting turning, leave it for another day. You´re going down to fight in his sandbox and there´s too much chance of being hit by something else less small arms or manpad to make it worthwhile.
Anyway, how can you tell zoomy hand combat stories about a fight with a chopper. No street cred whatsoever, particularly if you didn´t get a kill....
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: planet earth
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gaz ED
Some quality responses there!
Surely a big fat wobbly Chinook couldn't get out of the way that quick!
Surely a big fat wobbly Chinook couldn't get out of the way that quick!
Back when we had Lynx/TOW, one of my Flight Commanders did advocate lobbing a TOW in the general direction of the incoming FJ, his theory being that anyone seeing a humungous cloud of smoke emanating from his intended target might have been dissuaded from pursuing the engagement. The fact that he was on attachment from an allied army with far more missiles than us may have some bearing on his philosophy.
We'd have much rather bugged out and kept evading until FJ mate either got bored or ran out of fuel. Hiding in fire-breaks in forestry doesn't always work against A10s - they just about fit between the trees.
We'd have much rather bugged out and kept evading until FJ mate either got bored or ran out of fuel. Hiding in fire-breaks in forestry doesn't always work against A10s - they just about fit between the trees.
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Nath
Last I heard our Typhoons didn't have cannons... isn't that still the case?
Hence my ironic post - I just can't see the point of having a weapon and not be ing able to use it, but maybe that's because in my days in green I never carried anything I didn't really need
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Berks, UK
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by diginagain
Back when we had Lynx/TOW, one of my Flight Commanders did advocate lobbing a TOW in the general direction of the incoming FJ, his theory being that anyone seeing a humungous cloud of smoke emanating from his intended target might have been dissuaded from pursuing the engagement. The fact that he was on attachment from an allied army with far more missiles than us may have some bearing on his philosophy.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Age: 55
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by diginagain
Gaz ED, from the point of view of the evading helicopter, it's difficult to see how a fast-mover is going to visually acquire, track and engage a slow, but moving target. One evasive manouevre is to run at max chat towards the attacking aircraft, staying low down so he has to continually lower his nose to keep sight of you.
If the weather is bad, then the old 'racetrack' technique will always provide one FJ visual with said helo but you run the risk of collecting a bunch of lead from the side door of the target or from the nose cannon of an AH
Visually acquiring helos is tricky, but actually not prohibitively difficult. Radars work too - they don't all just look at the vector of the target and some modes can take into account the rotor blades travelling at a great range of speeds from the centre to the tip ....
ps. Max chat in most helos is prob somewhere around 150kts .. that means you move 2.5nm per min. Given the fact that most FJ intercepts take place at 20nm/min, a helos travel is hardly unpredictable. And they tend to stick to valleys too.
pps. Despite all the above, they're not the easiest of targets to engage successfully, but it is a matter of coordination and discipline. And occasionally some godlike radar work.