Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

First Pics (?) of GE UCAV/URAV

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

First Pics (?) of GE UCAV/URAV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Feb 2006, 21:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: .
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First Pics (?) of GE UCAV/URAV

http://www.flightinternational.com/A...rolls+out.html
How did that old saying go?: "If it looks right....":
80605 is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2006, 22:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cottam Tower
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Something familiar about that...

Is it just me or does that look far too much like a WW2 V2? After all it has got the right markings on it.
Vidal is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2006, 22:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it just me or does it look a bit like a doodle-bug?
RNGrommits is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2006, 22:20
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: .
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you squint, you can just make out the dive-brakes.....
80605 is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2006, 07:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,811
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Hmmm....

I wonder what level of systems redundancies are built in to these infernal roboplanes? Steve Fossett's Virgin Atlantic Global Flyer only had about 15 minutes flying time available after its single generator failed, but with a human pilot at the controls was able to land safely.

I doubt the same outcome would have happened had it been an unmanned aerial vehicle. Which is yet another reason why these damn things should only ever be permitted to be operated over sparsely inhabited areas.
BEagle is online now  
Old 12th Feb 2006, 08:52
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point BEagle, but there is a school of thought that says that, when compared with the current generation of fast-jet combat aircraft, the UCAV will dispense with the biggest limitation to performance and the greatest single source of errors and mistakes - the pilot! But who will get to be CAS in the future? If there is one?........

Last edited by LFFC; 12th Feb 2006 at 09:10.
LFFC is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2006, 08:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LFFC
Good point BEagle, but there is a school of thought that says that, when compared with the current generation of fast-jet combat aircraft, the UCAV will dispense with the biggest limitation to performance and the greatest single source of errors and mistakes! But who will get to be CAS in the future? If there is one?........
R2D2 would be my bet
grunt@dhfs.org is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2006, 09:32
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lowlevel UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try some Network54 pics from a sparsely inhabited area. They offer a better idea of size.
Janes has a bit more info on this German/Spanish venture but where does the payload fit?



Data-Lynx is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.